Pakistan envoy warns of danger of deploying militias to fight Afghan Taliban 

Afghan militia gather with their weapons to support Afghanistan security forces against the Taliban, in Afghan warlord and former Mujahideen leader Ismail Khan's house in Herat on July 9, 2021. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 11 July 2021
Follow

Pakistan envoy warns of danger of deploying militias to fight Afghan Taliban 

  • Several warlords have started mobilizing fighters to defend their territory, Pakistan’s Kabul envoy warns this could make things worse
  • Calls on international community to help strengthen Afghan security forces, says worsening security could trigger refugees influx into Pakistan    

KABUL: Pakistan’s envoy to Kabul called on the international community Saturday to help strengthen Afghanistan’s security forces, warning that deploying militiamen to fight the Taliban could worsen the situation in the violence-wracked country. 

The Taliban have launched a blistering offensive across Afghanistan since early May, capturing a vast swath of the country as US forces leave the country after 20 years. 

With the insurgents claiming to control 85 percent of the country, several warlords have started mobilizing fighters to defend their territory and back government forces against the Taliban. 

But Pakistan’s ambassador to Kabul, Mansoor Ahmad Khan, warned that this could make things worse. 

“If things translate into some kind of warfare between militias and Taliban, it will be dangerous,” Khan said in an interview with AFP. 

“Therefore, it is important that Afghan government’s capacity to defend these attacks and these security challenges is strengthened.” 

On Friday, veteran warlord Ismail Khan — whose forces helped topple the Taliban in 2001 — vowed to back government forces fighting against the insurgents. 

Pakistan’s envoy Khan said more international cooperation was needed in support of President Ashraf Ghani’s government, which he said was a “legitimate government at the moment in Afghanistan.” 

“Therefore all the countries, the international community, have to extend all possible support to Afghanistan in dealing with the security challenges,” Khan said. 

He also expressed concern that a worsening situation in Afghanistan could trigger a fresh wave of refugees crossing into Pakistan. 

“If the situation continues to worsen and deteriorate in Afghanistan... there can be an influx of refugees because of very close cross-border cultural contexts and religious context existing between our two societies,” he said. 

“Our first effort or first focus is to avoid things going into that direction,” he said, insisting that a political solution was the only way to resolve the conflict in Afghanistan. 

“If there is an inclusive, broad-based and comprehensive political settlement, it will be in the interest of not only Afghanistan but all of Afghanistan’s neighbors.” 

Afghan officials have regularly blamed Pakistan for backing the Taliban for decades. Pakistan denies this.

The hard-line movement originated among young Afghans who studied in religious schools in Pakistan after fleeing Afghanistan during the 1979-89 Soviet occupation. 

Pakistan was one of only four countries to recognize the legitimacy of the first Taliban government between 1996 to 2001 — the others being Saudi Arabia, Turkmenistan and the UAE. 


Pakistan urges diplomacy on Iran nuclear issue, warns sanctions would hurt civilians

Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan urges diplomacy on Iran nuclear issue, warns sanctions would hurt civilians

  • Pakistan warns the situation has become more complex since Israel’s attack on Iran and US bombing of nuclear sites
  • It cautions against invoking the snapback mechanism, saying sanctions will further deepen mistrust, derail diplomacy

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan demanded on Tuesday that diplomacy be given a chance in addressing all issues related to Iran’s nuclear program, warning the United Nations Security Council that sanctions would hurt ordinary Iranians, as tensions remain heightened following this year’s war between Israel and Iran.

Pakistan’s comments came amid renewed debate at the Security Council over Iran’s nuclear program and the future of the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), which sought to limit Tehran’s nuclear activities in exchange for sanctions relief.

The conflict in June was dubbed the Twelve-Day War and erupted after Israel carried out a surprise attack on Iranian military and nuclear facilities while international diplomacy was still underway. The strikes derailed negotiations, with the United States later bombing Iranian nuclear sites and declaring that the attacks had substantially degraded Iran’s nuclear capabilities.

Addressing the Security Council, Pakistan’s Acting Permanent Representative Ambassador Usman Jadoon said Islamabad believed that “diplomacy and dialogue should be the guiding principles for the resolution of all outstanding issues concerning Iran’s nuclear program in accordance with the rights, obligations and responsibilities of the parties concerned.”

“Coercive measures would not help in bringing the parties closer and only exacerbate the trust deficit,” he said. “Sanctions directly hurt ordinary people the most, impact trade, affect economic development and diminish the prospects of regional connectivity.”

Jadoon said the council last met on the issue in September following developments related to the JCPOA’s “snapback” mechanism — a provision that allows the automatic re-imposition of UN sanctions on Iran in cases of alleged non-compliance — adding that Pakistan opposed what it viewed as a rushed move and cautioned against hasty action.

He said Pakistan’s stance was grounded in the belief that disputes over Iran’s nuclear program should be resolved through dialogue, with more time allowed for diplomacy to succeed, while preserving the JCPOA framework until a successor arrangement is reached.

The ambassador said divisions within the council had widened in recent months, further complicating efforts to resolve the issue.

While acknowledging that the JCPOA was not implemented as intended, Jadoon said the agreement had nonetheless provided an essential framework rooted in international law and mutual respect, and could still prove useful if there was a shared willingness to move forward in a spirit of compromise.

He stressed the need to revive the agreement’s underlying principles and restore trust in diplomatic engagement that had been damaged in recent months, urging all parties to avoid confrontation and work toward a solution-oriented approach.