Kashmiris can choose independence if they opt for Pakistan in plebiscite — PM Khan

Pakistan premier Imran Khan addresses the Azad Jammu and Kashmir assembly in Muzaffarabad, Pakistan, on Aug. 5, 2020. (PID)
Short Url
Updated 06 February 2021
Follow

Kashmiris can choose independence if they opt for Pakistan in plebiscite — PM Khan

  • UN adopted several resolutions in 1948 and in 1950s on the dispute between India and Pakistan, including one which says a plebiscite be held to determine the future of Kashmir
  • Khan reminds UN it had not fulfilled its promise to the people of Kashmir, promises to remain an ambassador for Kashmiris

ISLAMABAD: Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan announced on Friday he would give the people of the disputed Kashmir valley the “right” to choose independence if they voted in favor of becoming a part of Pakistan in a future plebiscite.
Khan made the statement while addressing a Kashmir Solidarity Day rally in the Kotli district of Azad Kashmir, the part of the disputed valley administered by Pakistan. The day is commemorated by Pakistan each year on February 5. 
Pakistan and India both claim disputed Kashmir in full but rule it in part. UN peacekeepers have been deployed since 1949 to observe a ceasefire between India and Pakistan in Jammu and Kashmir.
The UN Security Council adopted several resolutions in 1948 and in the 1950s on the dispute between India and Pakistan over the Kashmir region, including one which says a plebiscite should be held to determine the future of mostly Muslim Kashmir. 
The prime minister said he wanted to remind the United Nations it had not fulfilled its promise to the people of Kashmir who were assured their right to self-determination under its resolutions. 
"According to the United Nations Security Council resolutions, the people of Kashmir had to get the right to determine their own future," he told the rally, referring to a plebiscite. "Today, I want to remind the world that it has not fulfilled that promise. This is despite the fact that the same United Nations helped the Christian population of East Timor get their independence from Indonesia through a referendum."
"Let me say this today that Inshallah when the people of Kashmir get their right … when you will decide on your future and when the people of Kashmir will Inshallah decide in favour of Pakistan, after that Pakistan will give the people of Kashmir the right to decide if they want to be independent or stay a part of Pakistan. That will be your right!”
Khan said his administration had tried to normalize relations with India after winning general elections in 2018 but the New Delhi government was never interested in peace and wanted to escalate hostilities in the region for domestic political point scoring and to secure election victories.
"I also want to tell the people of [Indian] occupied Kashmir that Pakistan stands in solidarity with them," Khan said. "In fact, the whole Muslim world stands with them. Even if some Muslim governments are not supporting them for some reason, I can assure the people of Kashmir that Muslim populations of these states still stand with them as well."
Later in the day, the foreign office of Pakistan issued a statement, saying there was no change in Pakistan’s principled position on the Jammu and Kashmir dispute that remained anchored in the relevant UN Security Council resolutions. 
“The Prime Minister repeatedly spoke about the UNSC resolutions on Jammu and Kashmir and underscored the need for implementation of those resolutions,” the statement added. “Pakistan remains firmly committed to the resolution of the Jammu and Kashmir dispute through free and impartial plebiscite under the UN auspices as enshrined in the relevant UNSC resolutions.” 


Separated twice: An Afghan man’s life in Pakistan and the fear of losing home again

Updated 2 min 39 sec ago
Follow

Separated twice: An Afghan man’s life in Pakistan and the fear of losing home again

  • Lost as a child in Peshawar, Mohammad Rahim Khan built a life in Pakistan but remains undocumented
  • Deportation drive of ‘illegal’ foreigners exposes legal gaps around adoption, marriage, refugee status

ISLAMABAD: Mohammad Rahim Khan was five years old when he last saw his mother.

It was at the Hajji Camp bus stop in Pakistan’s northwestern city of Peshawar, more than four decades ago. His mother, an Afghan refugee fleeing war, had brought him across the Tari Mangal border in Kurram district and into Pakistan. While waiting at the crowded terminal, Khan wandered to a nearby toy shop. When he returned, she was gone.

He searched for her for two days. She never came back.

A local shopkeeper, Ali Muhammad, took pity on the child and brought him home, promising to help find his family. The temporary shelter became permanent. Khan grew up in Pakistan, adopted informally into the household, and never returned to Afghanistan.

Now 45, he lives on the outskirts of Islamabad in a modest two-room house, working as a daily wage laborer. But a nationwide deportation drive launched by Pakistan in 2023 has placed his entire life under threat.

Since November 2023, authorities have deported nearly 2 million Afghan nationals, targeting those without legal documentation. Khan, who has remained undocumented throughout his adult life, fears he may soon be among them.

“I spoke to my lawyer that I am very worried,” Khan told Arab News. “I love Pakistan.”

A FAMILY WITHOUT PAPERS

Ali Muhammad later married Khan to his daughter, Gul Mina. Together, they have six children, four daughters and two sons. Yet despite decades in Pakistan, Khan’s Afghan nationality continues to shadow the family.

Khan never held an Afghan refugee card, Afghan Citizen Card (ACC), Proof of Registration (POR), or any other formal documentation. His family assumed for decades that his informal adoption, marriage to a Pakistani citizen, and long residence would provide sufficient legal standing. They only sought legal advice when the deportation drive began threatening separation.

Without a Pakistani national identity card, his children cannot obtain Form-B, the birth registration document required for school enrolment.

“They [children] are told to get a Form-B,” Gul Mina told Arab News. “Otherwise, they will not go to school.”

Three of their daughters were forced to leave school after eighth grade.

Healthcare has also been affected. When Khan’s 13-year-old son, Ehsanullah, fractured his arm, a public hospital refused to issue a registration card without identity documents.

“Then I went to a [private clinic] in Chak Shahzad and got my treatment there,” Khan said.

The family has petitioned the Islamabad High Court to block his deportation. Lawyers say the case highlights how thousands of long-term residents fall through legal cracks created by Pakistan’s citizenship, refugee and documentation framework.

LEGAL GREY ZONE

Pakistan does not legally recognize Western-style adoption. Instead, it uses a guardianship system under the 1890 Guardians and Wards Act, aligning with Islamic principles that preserve lineage, so adopted children don’t inherit or change their family name but receive care, education and welfare through court-appointed guardianship.

“Because we don’t have a legal pathway for adoption per se, the adopted child does not get citizenship of the adopting parents automatically,” said Advocate Umer Ijaz Gillani, a legal expert on citizenship.

Years earlier, Khan’s father-in-law had offered to register him as his biological son to obtain identity documents, but Khan refused, calling the move fraudulent. Because Khan later married his father-in-law’s daughter, both he and his wife cannot legally list the same person as their father on official records, leaving them without a lawful workaround.

Marriage offers no certainty either. Pakistan’s Citizenship Act of 1951 grants citizenship to foreign women married to Pakistani men, but is silent on foreign husbands married to Pakistani women.

While higher courts have, at times, ruled in favor of such men, implementation has been inconsistent. In October 2025, the Supreme Court struck down a high court order that had directed authorities to grant citizenship to an Afghan man married to a Pakistani woman.

Even the Pakistan Origin Card (POC), a long-term residency document, remains difficult to secure.

“We have experienced that in the case of especially Afghan men who marry Pakistani women, the government authorities are often reluctant to recognize this right,” Gillani said.

According to submissions made by government officials in court, authorities have received at least 117 applications for nationality from Afghan men married to Pakistani women following directives issued by the Peshawar High Court, reflecting a broader pattern rather than isolated cases.

‘NO RELAXATION’

Officials say the deportation policy allows no exceptions.

“No relaxation has been granted by the government, including for those who’ve married to Pakistani citizens,” said Asmatullah Shah, the chief commissionerate for Afghan refugees.

“If they want to live here, they should go back and apply for a visa and then they can come here with valid documentation.”

Legal experts note that deportation would send Khan to Afghanistan despite having no known relatives there, and that returning legally would require obtaining an Afghan passport and a Pakistani visa, costs far beyond the means of a daily wage laborer.

For Khan’s mother-in-law, Husn Pari, who raised him for decades as her own son, the prospect is devastating.

“When I am not able to meet [Khan] for one day, my day does not pass,” she said. “His own mother, how much pain must she be in?”

For Khan, the fear of deportation echoes the trauma of his childhood.

“Before I was separated from my first mother,” he said. “The second time I will be separated from my second mother. This is very difficult for me.”