Violent lockdown protests wound dozens in northern Lebanon

Lebanese security forces use water cannon to disperse protesters outside the Serail, headquarters of the Governorate of North Lebanon, during ongoing demonstrations in Lebanon's northern port city of Tripoli on January 27, 2021. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 28 January 2021
Follow

Violent lockdown protests wound dozens in northern Lebanon

  • Hariri: Some are using people’s pain to deliver political messages

BEIRUT: The Lebanese Army Command has announced that 31 soldiers were wounded during clashes between protesters and security forces in the northern city of Tripoli, after protests turned violent.

People took to the streets in Tripoli, the south Beirut Dahye suburbs and in the Bekaa to protest their living conditions after a lockdown to stop the spread of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) in Lebanon has been extended until Feb. 8.

The command said: “Soldiers were wounded after being attacked by protesters with stones, Molotov cocktails and firecrackers. Military vehicles and gear have also been damaged. Five people have been arrested for causing damage to public and private properties, as well as inciting riots and assault on security forces.”

On Wednesday morning, van drivers who were banned from working due to the current lockdown closed the strategic main road of Dahr Al-Baydar linking Beirut and Bekaa.

Protests continued in Tripoli with the participation of activists in Akkar in the far north.

These protests were explained by the Lebanese media as “politically motivated movements.”

Protests have also coincided with a campaign on social media against the Lebanese President Michel Aoun, launched mostly by supporters of Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri.

The campaign came in response to Free Patriotic Movement official and former minister Mario Aoun’s tweet: “No one can eliminate the phenomenon of Michel Aoun and we will extend his presidential term.” 

His tweet was a response to a call for early parliamentary elections from various political parties, notably the Lebanese Forces and Kataeb.

The government formation matter has turned into a political dilemma as confidence has been lost among political leaders who stand accused of putting personal gain over public interest.

Prime Minister-designate Saad Hariri was instructed to form a new government on Oct. 22, but no progress has been made, with Aoun opposed to Hariri’s proposed cabinet of 18 ministers.

Aoun had earlier said in a statement that “naming, nominating and distributing the ministers to ministerial portfolios is not an exclusive right for the prime minister-designate, based on two articles in the constitution,” adding that the president “has a constitutional right to approve the entire government before signing.”

In a tweet on Wednesday, Hariri expressed concern “that some might be using the Lebanese people’s suffering and hard living conditions to deliver political messages through the protests.”

MP Anwar Al-Khalil addressed Aoun directly in a tweet, holding him “responsible for getting 60 percent of the Lebanese people below the poverty line while the only thing you care about is to preserve the seat of presidency to pass it on to your son-in-law.”

He also accused the president of “pushing the PM-designate toward resigning over failing to fulfill this task.”

The Beirut-based Arabic Al-Mayadeen TV channel quoted sources close to the presidency affirming that “the ‘I-am-the-strongest’ policy will not work and using people’s instincts in a constitutional matter will not work either. What will actually help Lebanon is for Hariri to go back to the constitution and form a salvation government in cooperation with the president.”

With growing political rifts and stubbornness, religious leaders in Lebanon warned of “quickening collapse amid the continuing rifts among decision makers and the obstruction of national and foreign attempts to bring the two sides together to save the country from the disaster that would be the result of miscalculations and personal differences leading Lebanon to an impasse.”

Religious leaders called for “immediate action to form a government above all personal and factional interests.”

They delivered a clear message to stop messing with the country’s fate. “The people will not forgive and history will not forget,” they said.


Abbas reiterates opposition to displacement of Palestinians

Russian President Vladimir Putin with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas at the Senate Palace of the Kremlin in Moscow. (AP)
Updated 23 January 2026
Follow

Abbas reiterates opposition to displacement of Palestinians

  • During Moscow talks, president calls for immediate halt to Israeli acts of terror
  • Historically, Russia has supported and stood by the Palestinian people at political and diplomatic levels

MOSCOW: The Palestinian National Authority’s President Mahmoud Abbas has reiterated his opposition to all attempts to displace Palestinian people from their land.

Speaking with Russian President Vladimir Putin at the presidential palace in Moscow, Abbas was reported by the Kremlin’s official website as saying that “the Palestinian people are holding on to their land, and we categorically oppose attempts by the Americans and Israelis to expatriate Palestinians beyond Palestinian territory.” 
He said the Palestinian people “will not abandon their land, whatever the cost.” Abbas stressed the need to fully implement US President Donald Trump’s peace plan, leading to the withdrawal of occupation forces and the launch of the reconstruction process.
He emphasized that the Palestinian Authority would assume a central role in administering the Gaza Strip, and that the enclave and the West Bank constituted two parts of a single territorial unit, with a unified and undifferentiated system of civilian institutions.
He stressed the need for an immediate halt to “Israeli settler colonialism and Israeli acts of terror in the West Bank, including Jerusalem, along with the release of withheld Palestinian funds and the cessation of all measures that undermined the Palestinian Authority and the two-state solution.”
He reaffirmed his commitment to continue the struggle for the realization of the Palestinian people’s right to self-determination and of their right to a fully sovereign, independent state based on the borders of June 4, 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital, while living in security and peace with neighbors.
He told Putin: “What we need is peace, and we hope that with your help and support, we can achieve it — a peace built on the basis of international legal resolutions, decisions of the United Nations, and the principles established following the wars of 1967 and 1973.
“East Jerusalem remains the capital of Palestine, and we know that Russia has always supported — indeed, was the first to support — Palestine, maintaining a firm stance in support of our people.”
Abbas thanked his Russian counterpart for Moscow’s support and commended the bilateral “bonds of friendship” between both countries. He added: “We are friends of Russia and the Russian people. For over 50 years our nations have been bound by a strong friendship that has developed over the decades and continues on the correct path. Russia is a great friend and a nation upon which we rely in many spheres.
“Historically, Russia has supported and stood by the Palestinian people at political and diplomatic levels. Your economic and financial support is both significant in scale and crucial in importance.”
Abbas emphasized moving forward with the implementation of a comprehensive national reform program aimed at consolidating the rule of law, strengthening the principles of good governance, transparency, and accountability, and ensuring the separation of powers.
Putin affirmed Moscow’s “principled and consistent approach” to the Palestinian question.
He said: “We believe that only the establishment and full functioning of the Palestinian state can lead to a lasting settlement of the Middle East conflict.”