Biden plans immediate end to Trump’s ‘travel ban’ on Muslim majority states

US President-Elect Joe Biden speaks at Major Joseph R. "Beau" Biden III National Guard /Reserve Center in New Castle Airport on January 19, 2021, in New Castle, Delaware, before departing for Washington, DC. (File/AFP)
Short Url
Updated 20 January 2021
Follow

Biden plans immediate end to Trump’s ‘travel ban’ on Muslim majority states

  • The controversial ban was introduced during Trump’s first week in office and caused widespread protest
  • The policy followed Trump’s pledge where he called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the US”

WASHINGTON: Joe Biden will sign orders hours after being sworn in as US President to break from policies imposed by the departing President Donald Trump, including a ban on visitors from several majority-Muslim countries.
The controversial ban was introduced during Trump’s first week in office, causing widespread protest and condemnation.
After court rulings invalidated the first versions of the ban, in 2018 the Supreme Court upheld the Trump administration’s third version, which applied to nationals of five majority-Muslim countries — Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria and Yemen.
Trump claimed the ban did not target Muslims, and was meant to keep the US “safe and free.”
In 2020, the ban was extended to include restrictions on permanent immigration for people from six other countries, including Sudan and Nigeria.
The policy followed Trump’s pledge on his campaign trail in which he called for “a total and complete shutdown of Muslims entering the United States until our country's representatives can figure out what is going on.”
Biden will also sign 16 other actions on the environment, fighting Covid-19 and the economy, aides said.
In first-day moves, he will halt construction of the wall that Trump ordered on the US-Mexico border to stem unauthorized migration.
He will also set a mask mandate on federal properties to stem the spread of COVID-19, restore protections of nature reserves removed by Trump, and seek freezes on evictions and protection for millions behind on their mortgages due to the coronavirus pandemic.
He also plans to send a bill to Congress to revamp immigration policies and give millions of undocumented migrants living in the country a path to citizenship that the Trump administration denied.
Biden “will take action — not just to reverse the gravest damages of the Trump administration — but also to start moving our country forward,” the aides said in a statement.

(With AFP)


Ratcliffe says he is sorry his UK ‘colonized by immigrants’ remark offended some

Manchester United co-owner Jim Ratcliffe stands in front of the former manager Alex Ferguson.
Updated 12 February 2026
Follow

Ratcliffe says he is sorry his UK ‘colonized by immigrants’ remark offended some

  • His comments were condemned ‌by politicians, campaigners and by fan groups at Manchester United
  • Muslim Supporters Club said the term “colonized” was frequently used by far-right activists to frame migrants as invaders

LONDON: British billionaire Jim Ratcliffe said on Thursday he was sorry he had ​offended some people by saying the country had been “colonized by immigrants,” after Prime Minister Keir Starmer joined a chorus of criticism over the remarks.
Ratcliffe, one of Britain’s most successful businessmen, responded to the outcry with a statement saying it was important to raise the issue of immigration, but that he regretted his “choice of language” had caused concern.
The founder of chemicals giant INEOS, and owner of nearly a third of Manchester United, had told Sky News that high migration and people living on benefits were damaging the economy.
Finance minister: Comments were “disgusting”
“You can’t have an economy with nine million people on benefits and huge levels of immigrants coming in. I mean, the UK has been colonized — it’s ‌costing too much ‌money,” Ratcliffe said in the interview aired on Wednesday.
“The UK has been ​colonized ‌by immigrants, ⁠really, ​hasn’t ⁠it?” he added.
Starmer said the remarks were wrong and would play into the hands of those who wanted to divide the country. Finance minister Rachel Reeves said the comments were “unacceptable” and “disgusting.”
On Thursday, INEOS issued a statement from Ratcliffe in response to “reporting of his comments.”
“I am sorry that my choice of language has offended some people in the UK and Europe and caused concern but it is important to raise the issue of controlled and well-managed immigration that supports economic growth,” he said.
He said he wanted to stress that governments must manage migration alongside investment in skills, industry and jobs to ensure long-term prosperity ⁠is shared by everyone, and that it was “critical that we maintain an open debate ‌on the challenges facing the UK.”
Starmer’s spokesperson said it was right ‌for him to apologize. Asked if an apology about offense caused rather ​than the comments themselves were enough, the spokesperson said ‌questions on the detail of the apology were for Ratcliffe.
Manchester United fans flag up use of “colonized”
His comments were condemned ‌by politicians, campaigners and by fan groups at Manchester United, including its Muslim Supporters Club who said the term “colonized” was frequently used by far-right activists to frame migrants as invaders.
“Public discourse shapes public behavior,” the group said. “When influential figures adopt language that mirrors extremist talking points, it risks legitimising prejudice and deepening division.”
Others noted that the Manchester United first team was largely made up ‌of international players and staff, and questioned whether Ratcliffe should be commenting on British politics when he had moved to the tax haven Monaco.
Before Ratcliffe’s response, The ⁠Mayor of Greater Manchester ⁠Andy Burnham said Ratcliffe’s comments were inflammatory and should be withdrawn.
Immigration debate has intensified
Immigration has consistently been among the top voter concerns in Britain according to opinion polls, and has helped fuel the rise of Nigel Farage’s right-wing populist party Reform UK.
Rhetoric around immigration has hardened in recent years and a wave of protests broke out last summer outside hotels housing asylum seekers. Widespread rioting also occurred in 2024, sparked by false information circulating online that a teenager who killed three young girls was an Islamist migrant.
Sky said Ratcliffe had cited incorrect figures to back up his argument. He said the population had risen from 58 million to 70 million people since 2020. The Office for National Statistics estimates the UK population was 67 million in mid-2020 and 69 million in mid-2024.
The population was around 59 million in 2000. Ratcliffe and his office did not immediately respond to Reuters questions about the figures he ​used.
Farage responded to the comments by saying that Britain ​had undergone mass immigration that had changed the character of many areas in the country. “Labour may try to ignore that but Reform won’t,” he said.