New Delhi says ‘no decision made’ on voting rights for Indians in Gulf

Indians living in the Gulf said it feels like New Delhi is treating them as second-class citizens, even though they are the main source of foreign remittances. (Shutterstock)
Short Url
Updated 18 December 2020
Follow

New Delhi says ‘no decision made’ on voting rights for Indians in Gulf

  • Recent reports suggested that, unlike counterparts in Western countries, Indians in the Gulf will not be allowed to vote
  • Nearly 10 million citizens who live and working in Gulf countries are India’s main source of foreign remittances

NEW DELHI: The Indian government on Thursday said it has not yet decided whether citizens living in foreign countries will be allowed to vote in the upcoming regional elections.

The comment came days after a newspaper report claimed that those in Gulf countries would be denied the opportunity to cast ballots.

English-language daily the Indian Express reported on Tuesday that Indians citizens in several foreign countries — including the US, Canada, Australia, Germany and South Africa — will be granted voting rights, but those in the Gulf will not because the Foreign Ministry has “reservations” about the issue. The report said officials from the election commission and the ministry met last week to discuss the matter.

Foreign Ministry spokesman Anurag Srivastava neither confirmed nor denied the report, but told Arab News: “At this point in time no decision has been taken in this regard.”

India does not have postal-voting mechanisms in place. In November, however, the Election Commission proposed that the government should allow nationals living in other countries to cast ballots there during the upcoming regional elections in several states.

Following the newspaper report, Indians living in the Gulf said it feels like New Delhi is treating them as second-class citizens, even though they are the main source of foreign remittances.

“We are large in numbers and we contribute the maximum in terms of remittances,” said superstore manager Godugu Bhumesh, who has lived in Oman for 10 years.

“It hurts — are we not Indian citizens? Please tell me. Don’t we have Indian passports? Aren’t we sending money from the Gulf to India?”

Almost half of an estimated 20 million overseas Indians — officially known as non-resident Indians (NRIs) — live and work in six Gulf nations. In 2017, their remittances constituted about 53 percent of India’s total cash inflows of about $69 billion, according to data from the Reserve Bank of India.

“New Delhi thinks that the NRIs in the Gulf countries are poor laborers,” said Mohammed Abed, who lives in Dubai. “But the fact remains that remittances from our region are more than what (Indians in the) US and other countries send.”

Basant Reddy, a social activist from Telangana state who provides assistance to NRIs in the Middle East, said: “By denying them voting rights, the Indian government continues with its neglect of Indian workers in the Gulf.”

Professor Irudaya Rajan, of the Center for Development Studies in Trivandrum, Kerala, said: “I think the government must be thinking that managing people in the Gulf would be a problem because of their sheer numbers.”

It might be easier to manage voting among the smaller Indian populations in the UK, US and other countries, he added.

“Out of 20 million Indians abroad, approximately 10 million live in six countries in the Gulf,” Rajan said. “Another 10 million are living in 194 other countries. It is easier to manage those 194 countries than the six countries in the Gulf. This is a huge task — it’s an administrative challenge.”
 


US allies, foes alarmed by capture of Venezuela’s Maduro

Updated 03 January 2026
Follow

US allies, foes alarmed by capture of Venezuela’s Maduro

  • Countries such as Russia and China, which had ties with Maduro’s government, were quick to condemn the operation but alarm also shared by France and EU
  • UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was “deeply alarmed” by the US strikes

PARIS: The US military operation that led to the seizure of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro on Saturday sparked alarm across the international community, with allies and foes of Washington and Caracas expressing disquiet.
US President Donald Trump said Maduro and his wife would be taken to New York to face federal charges after military strikes and an operation which he described as looking like a “television show.”
The Venezuelan government decried what it termed a “extremely serious military aggression” by Washington and declared a state of emergency.
Countries such as Russia and Iran, which had longstanding ties with Maduro’s government, were quick to condemn the operation but their alarm was also shared by Washington’s allies including France and the EU.
Here is a rundown of the main reaction.

Russia

Russia demanded the US leadership “reconsider its position and release the legally elected president of the sovereign country and his wife.”

China

Beijing said “China is deeply shocked and strongly condemns the US’s blatant use of force against a sovereign state and its action against its president.”

Iran

Iran, which Trump bombed last year, said it “strongly condemns the US military attack on Venezuela and a flagrant violation of the country’s national sovereignty and territorial integrity.”

Mexico

Mexico, which Trump has also threatened with military force over drug trafficking, strongly condemned the US military action in Venezuela, saying it “seriously jeopardizes regional stability.”

Colombia

Colombian President Gustavo Petro — whose country neighbors Venezuela — called the US action an “assault on the sovereignty” of Latin America which would lead to a humanitarian crisis.

Brazil

Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva slammed the US attacks as a “serious affront” to Venezuela’s sovereignty.

Cuba

Cuba, a strong ally of Venezuela, denounced “state terrorism against the brave Venezuelan people.”

Spain

Spain offered to mediate in the crisis to find a way to a peaceful solution, while calling for “de-escalation and restraint.”

France

France condemned the US operation, saying it undermined international law and no solution to Venezuela’s crisis can be imposed from the outside.

EU

The EU more generally expressed concern at the developments and urged respect for international law, even as it noted that Maduro “lacks legitimacy.”
EU candidate country North Macedonia, along with fellow Balkan nations Albania and Kosovo, backed Washington, however.
“We stand with the United States and the Venezuelan people for freedom and democracy,” North Macedonia FM Timco Mucunski said on X.

Britain

British Prime Minister Keir Starmer said all countries should “uphold international law” and added that “the UK was not involved in any way in this operation” as he urged patience in order to “establish the facts.”

Italy

In a rare expression of support for the US operation by a major European country, far-right Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni — a Trump ally — argued the US military action in Venezuela was “legitimate” and “defensive.”

Israel

Israel also hailed the operation, saying Washington acted as the “leader of the free world.”

Ukraine

Ukraine — dependent on US support in its war against invading Russia — did not address the legality of a big country like America using military force against a much smaller one like Venezuela.
Foreign minister Andriy Sybiga instead focused on Maduro’s lack of legitimacy and the Venezuelan government’s repression, while backing “democracy, human rights, and the interests of Venezuelans.”

South Africa

South Africa, which Trump accuses of alleged discrimination — and even “genocide” — of minority white Afrikaners, said: “Unlawful, unilateral force of this nature undermines the stability of the international order and the principle of equality among nations.”

UN

UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres was “deeply alarmed” by the US strikes, with his spokesman quoting him as saying it could “constitute a dangerous precedent.”