London’s Harrods to reopen after first closure in 170 years

1 / 2
Harrods will aim to provide the classic shopping experience while ensuring the safety of customers. (AFP)
2 / 2
Staff will be on hand to remind customers of social distancing rules. (MATT CROSSICK)
Short Url
Updated 14 June 2020
Follow

London’s Harrods to reopen after first closure in 170 years

  • A raft of social distancing measures will be introduced to make shopping safe while still aiming to provide the Harrods experience.
  • But new UK quarantine rules mean Gulf Arab customers are unlikely to return soon

LONDON: The UK’s flagship luxury department store Harrods will reopen Monday having closed due to the coronavirus pandemic.

But new UK quarantine rules mean Gulf Arabs, who are among the store’s most dedicated customers, are unlikely to return soon.

The Knightsbridge store, famed for its selection of high-end brands and fine cuisine, will reopen under strict social distancing rules following its first closure in 170 years.

Saudis and other Gulf Arabs have long flocked to Harrods and the surrounding Knightsbridge area for its glamour, food and high-end shopping. 

But new government measures imposing 14 days' quarantine on most international arrivals could undercut the area's appeal to these sought-after guests and hamper its economic recovery, Michael Ward, managing director of Harrods, told The Sunday Times.

“London is the luxury capital of the world,” he said, “people won’t come.”

A raft of measures will be introduced to ensure shoppers can safely enjoy all that the store has to offer.

Technology will be used to monitor footfall and ensure social distancing can be maintained, while staff will be roaming the seven-floor building reminding customers to respect social distancing rules.

Shoppers will still be able to try on clothes, shoes and watches before they buy, but these will be put straight into quarantine if they aren’t purchased.

The beauty salon and wellness center, unable to ensure the safety of customers, will remain closed. The food hall will have a strictly regulated capacity — hungry visitors may be turned away at the entrance. 

Ward believes the store will still be able to provide the unique shopping experience for which it is famous while respecting strict social distancing measures.

“This is all about shopping as an experience. We’ve been through difficult times, but we want customers to have a joyful happy experience and see the most beautiful products,” he said.

Ward is also confident about the store bouncing back.

“People get back to their old ways very quickly,” he added, “There’s lots of pent up demand.”


Trump insists he struck Iran on his own terms

Updated 04 March 2026
Follow

Trump insists he struck Iran on his own terms

  • “We are now a nation divided between those who want to fight wars for Israel and those who just want peace and to be able to afford their bills and health insurance,” Marjorie Taylor Greene posted on X.
  • Rubio himself doubled down on Tuesday after meeting with US House and Senate members, while insisting that “No, I told you this had to happen anyway”

WASHINGTON, United States: President Donald Trump and his team scrambled Tuesday to reclaim the narrative on why he decided to attack Iran, after his top diplomat suggested the US struck only after learning of an imminent Israeli strike.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio alarmed Democrats — who say only Congress can declare war — as well as many of Trump’s MAGA supporters on Monday when he said: “We knew that there was going to be an Israeli action.”
“We knew that that would precipitate an attack against American forces, and we knew that if we didn’t pre-emptively go after them before they launched those attacks, we would suffer higher casualties,” Rubio told reporters.
Administration officials quickly backpedalled, insisting Trump authorized the strikes because Tehran was not seriously negotiating an accord on limiting its nuclear ambitions, and the United States needed to destroy Iran’s missile capabilities.
“No, Marco Rubio Didn’t Claim That Israel Dragged Trump into War with Iran,” White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt posted Tuesday on X.
At an Oval Office meeting later with Germany’s chancellor, Trump went further, saying that “Based on the way the negotiation was going, I think they (Iran) were going to attack first. And I didn’t want that to happen.”
“So, if anything, I might have forced Israel’s hand.”

- Had to happen? -

Rubio himself doubled down on Tuesday after meeting with US House and Senate members, while insisting that “No, I told you this had to happen anyway.”
“The president made a decision. The decision he made was that Iran was not going to be allowed to hide... behind this ability to conduct an attack.”
Critics seized on the muddied messaging to accuse Trump of precipitating the country into a war without a clear rationale, without informing Congress — and without a clear idea of how it might end.
They noted that just two weeks ago, Israel Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu pressed Trump again in Washington to take a hard line, in their seventh meeting since Trump’s return to power last year.
Some Republican allies rallied behind the president, with Senator Tom Cotton, chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, insisting that “No one pushes or drags Donald Trump anywhere.”
“He acts in the vital national security interest of the United States,” Cotton told the “Fox & Friends” morning show.
But as crucial US midterm elections approach that could see Republicans lose their congressional majority, Trump risks shedding supporters who had welcomed his pledge to end foreign military interventions.
“We are now a nation divided between those who want to fight wars for Israel and those who just want peace and to be able to afford their bills and health insurance,” Marjorie Taylor Greene, a top former Trump ally and a major figure in the populist and isolationist hard right, posted on X.