Taliban says no cease-fire with Kabul during Ramadan

Muslims offer Friday prayers on the first day of Ramadan in Kabul. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 26 April 2020
Follow

Taliban says no cease-fire with Kabul during Ramadan

  • NATO on Friday urged the Taliban to reduce violence and create conditions to commence negotiations. It also called on the group to fulfil its commitments to ensure that terrorists “never again find a haven on Afghan soil”

ISLAMABAD: Taliban attacks on Afghan forces are not a threat to a peace agreement signed with the US earlier this year because there is no cease-fire with Kabul, the militant group’s chief negotiator said Friday.
Sher Abbas Stanikzai, who secured the landmark peace deal for the group earlier this year, also said that the US had “failed to honor” its commitment to secure the release of 5,000 Taliban inmates.
“There is a complete cease-fire of the Islamic Emirate with the US under the agreement with the Americans and, as mentioned in that document, a cease-fire with the Kabul administration will be discussed when the intra-Afghan dialogue starts,” Stanikzai told Arab News in an exclusive interview, using the group’s own description.
“A separate agreement will be signed with the Kabul administration for a cease-fire.”
The agreement, which was signed on Feb. 29, called for the gradual withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan and the release of Taliban prisoners in exchange for 1,000 government security forces held by the group.
The deal required the prisoner exchange program to be concluded by March 10, following which both parties were to start a dialogue for a sustainable cease-fire and to decide on the future political roadmap for Afghanistan.
Stanikzai defended the Taliban’s attacks on Afghan forces.
“There is no mention of a cease-fire with the Kabul administration in the agreement,” he reiterated. “Reduction in violence and cease-fire will be discussed in the intra-Afghan dialogue. These negotiations have not yet started.”
NATO on Friday urged the Taliban to reduce violence and create conditions to commence negotiations. It also called on the group to fulfil its commitments to ensure that terrorists “never again find a haven on Afghan soil.”

FASTFACT

The agreement, which was signed on Feb. 29, called for the gradual withdrawal of foreign troops from Afghanistan and the release of Taliban prisoners in exchange for 1,000 government security forces held by the group.

“War is not one-sided from the Islamic Emirate,” said Stanikzai. “They (the Afghan forces) also carry out operations. They issued statements a few days ago that they had reclaimed areas from the Mujahideen after several years. They are also conducting raids. The Kabul administration and the Americans are to be blamed for the fighting since they are not ready for the intra-Afghan dialogue. They have not fulfilled the condition of releasing 5,000 Taliban prisoners before the start of the intra-Afghan dialogue. If they honor the commitment today, the intra-Afghan dialogue will start tomorrow,” he said.

When asked if Taliban violence posed any threat to the agreement he replied that routine operations against government forces would not create any problem since there was no significant difficulty in the deal with the US.
“The Americans committed some violations, but such mistakes are possible in a 20-year-old war. But we are in close contact with them and have taken up the issue with the US envoy, Zalmay Khalilzad, and the US commander, General Scott Miller, this month and they have promised not to repeat these mistakes in the future,” he said. “Both sides have formed a channel for the implementation of the agreement. The channel comprises the Taliban negotiators and a team of Americans. They regularly hold meetings in Doha and are making efforts to fully implement the agreement inside Afghanistan.”
US military spokesman in Afghanistan Col. Sonny Leggett denied the Taliban’s allegation in a series of tweets earlier this month, saying US forces had “upheld and continues to uphold the military terms of the US-TB (Taliban) agreement; any assertion otherwise is baseless.”
He also urged the Taliban to reduce violence.
On Thursday Deborah Lyons, head of the United Nations Assistance Mission in Afghanistan, encouraged everyone to get behind the secretary-general’s urgent call for a global cease-fire to “silence the guns and enable all Afghans to come together to fight the pandemic.”
Several Afghan officials have been reported as saying that dozens of security personnel have been killed in recent Taliban attacks in different parts of the country, resulting in Afghan President Ashraf Ghani appealing to the Taliban, on Wednesday, to declare a cease-fire during Ramadan which began in Afghanistan on Friday.
But the Taliban’s political spokesman, Suhail Shaheen, rejected the appeal as “illogical” and accused the government of “creating hurdles for the peace process.”
The office of the Afghan National Security Adviser said Friday that the government had released 550 Taliban prisoners. The insurgents said they had freed up to 60 government prisoners.


The shootings in Minneapolis are upending the politics of immigration in Congress

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

The shootings in Minneapolis are upending the politics of immigration in Congress

WASHINGTON: The shooting deaths of two American citizens during the Trump administration’s deportation operations in Minneapolis have upended the politics of immigration in Congress, plunging the country toward another government shutdown.
Democrats have awakened to what they see as a moral moment for the country, refusing funds for the Department of Homeland Security’s military-style immigration enforcement operations unless there are new restraints. Two former presidents, Barack Obama and Bill Clinton, have broken from retirement to speak out.
At the same time, Republicans who have championed President Donald Trump’s tough approach to immigration are signaling second thoughts. A growing number of Republicans want a full investigation into the shooting death of Alex Pretti and congressional hearings about US Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations.
“Americans are horrified & don’t want their tax dollars funding this brutality,” Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., wrote on social media. “Not another dime to this lawless operation.”
The result is a rapidly changing political environment as the nation considers the reach of the Trump administration’s well-funded immigration enforcement machinery and Congress spirals toward a partial federal shutdown if no resolution is reached by midnight Friday.
“The tragic death of Alex Pretti has refocused attention on the Homeland Security bill, and I recognize and share the concerns,” said Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, the GOP chair of the Appropriations Committee, in brief remarks Monday.
Still, she urged colleagues to stick to the funding deal and avoid a “detrimental shutdown.”
Searching for a way out of a crisis
As Congress seeks to defuse a crisis, the next steps are uncertain.
The White House has indicated its own shifting strategy, sending Trump’s border czar Tom Homan to Minneapolis to take over for hard-charging Border Patrol Commander Gregory Bovino, which many Republicans see as a potential turning point to calm operations.
“This is a positive development — one that I hope leads to turning down the temperature and restoring order in Minnesota,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune posted about Homan.
Behind the scenes, the White House is reaching out to congressional leaders, and even individual Democratic senators, in search of a way out of another government shutdown.
At stake is a six-bill government funding package, not just for Homeland Security but for Defense, Health and other departments, making up more than 70 percent of federal operations.
Even though Homeland Security has billions from Trump’s big tax break bill, Democrats are coalescing around changes to ICE operations. “We can still have some legitimate restriction on how these people are conducting themselves,” said Sen. Ruben Gallego, D-Arizona
But it appears doubtful the Trump administration would readily agree to Democrats’ demands to rein in immigration operations. Proposals for unmasking federal agents or limiting their reach into schools, hospitals or churches would be difficult to quickly approve in Congress.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said that while conversations are underway, Trump wants to see the bipartisan spending package approved to avoid the possibility of a government shutdown.
“We absolutely do not want to see that funding lapse,” Leavitt said.
Politics reflect changing attitudes on Trump’s immigration agenda
The political climate is a turnaround from just a year ago, when Congress easily passed the Laken Riley Act, the first bill Trump signed into law in his second term.
At the time, dozens of Democrats joined the GOP majority in passing the bill named after a Georgia nursing student who was killed by a Venezuelan man who had entered the country illegally.
Many Democrats had worried about the Biden administration’s record of having allowed untold immigrants into the country. The party was increasingly seen as soft on crime following the “defund the police” protests and the aftermath of the death of George Floyd at the the hands of law enforcement.
But the Trump administrations tactics changed all that.
Just 38 percent of US adults approve of how Trump is handling immigration, down from 49 percent in March, according to an AP-NORC poll conducted in January, shortly after the death of Renee Good, who was shot and killed by a ICE officer in Minnesota.
Last week, almost all House Democrats voted against the Homeland Security bill, as the package was sent the Senate.
Then there was the shooting death of Pretti over the weekend in Minneapolis.
Rep. Tom Suozzi of New York, who was among the seven Democrats who had voted to approve the Homeland Security funds, reversed course Monday in a Facebook post.
“I hear the anger from my constituents, and I take responsibility for that,” Suozzi wrote.
He said he “failed to view the DHS funding vote as a referendum on the illegal and immoral conduct of ICE in Minneapolis.”
Voting ahead as shutdown risk grows
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said Monday the responsibility for averting another shutdown falls to Republicans, who have majority control, to break apart the six-bill package, removing the homeland funds while allowing the others to go forward.
“We can pass them right away,” Schumer said.
But the White House panned that approach and House Speaker Mike Johnson, who has blamed Democrats for last year’s shutdown, the longest in history, has been mum. The GOP speaker would need to recall lawmakers to Washington to vote.
Republicans believe they will be able to portray Democrats as radical if the government shuts down over Homeland Security funds, and certain centrist Democrats have warned the party against strong anti-ICE language.
A memo from centrist Democratic group Third Way had earlier warned lawmakers against proposals to “abolish” ICE as “emotionally satisfying, politically lethal.” In a new memo Monday it proposed “Overhauling ICE” with top-to-bottom changes, including removing Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem from her job.
GOP faces a divide on deportations
But Republicans also risk being sideways with public opinion over Trump’s immigration and deportation agenda.
Republicans prefer to keep the focus on Trump’s ability to secure the US-Mexico border, with illegal crossings at all-time lows, instead of the military-style deportation agenda. They are particularly sensitive to concerns from gun owners’ groups that Pretti, who was apparently licensed to carry a firearm, is being criticized for having a gun with him before he was killed.
GOP Sen. Rand Paul, the chairman of the Homeland Security and Government Oversight Committee, demanded that acting ICE director Todd Lyons appear for a hearing — joining a similar demand from House Republicans over the weekend.
At the same time, many GOP lawmakers continue to embrace the Trump administration’s deportation strategy.
“I want to be very clear,” said Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., in a post. “I will not support any efforts to strip DHS of its funding.”
And pressure from their own right flank was bearing down on Republicans.
The Heritage Foundation chastised those Republicans who were “jubilant” at the prospect of slowing down ICE operations. “Deport every illegal alien,” it said in a post. “Nothing less.”