US to send Marines to embassy in Iraq as Trump blames Iran for ‘orchestrating’ attack

A member of the Hashed Al-Shaabi paramilitary forces holds a flag of Kataib Hezbollah during a protest against air strikes on their bases outside the main gate of the US Embassy in Baghdad. (Reuters/ File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 01 January 2020
Follow

US to send Marines to embassy in Iraq as Trump blames Iran for ‘orchestrating’ attack

JEDDAH: US President Donald Trump on Tuesday blamed Iran for “orchestrating” an attack on the US Embassy in Baghdad and said he would hold Tehran “fully responsible.”

The Pentagon said that in addition to Marines sent to protect embassy personnel, about 750 soldiers from the 82nd Airborne Division were being sent to the Middle East and that additional troops were prepared to deploy over the next several days.

Protesters scaled walls and attempted to force their way into the compound on Tuesday during demonstrations against American airstrikes on Iranian-backed militia group targets in Iraq.




Hashed Al-Shaabi militants set the US Embassy wall on fire as they protest against air strikes on their bases. (Reuters)

Writing on Twitter, Trump said: “Iran killed an American contractor, wounding many. We strongly responded, and always will. Now Iran is orchestrating an attack on the US Embassy in Iraq. They will be held fully responsible. In addition, we expect Iraq to use its forces to protect the embassy, and so notified.”

In a separate tweet, the US president added: “To those many millions of people in Iraq who want freedom and who don’t want to be dominated and controlled by Iran, this is your time!”

With the huge embassy put under lockdown, one official claimed dozens of extra US troops would be temporarily sent there, while another said two Apache helicopters had carried out a “show of force” over the site.

The US State Department and White House did not respond to a request for comment on whether the American ambassador and staff had been evacuated from the compound. However, Iraqi officials said the envoy and other workers had been moved out of the mission on Tuesday for their safety as thousands of angry protesters and militia fighters thronged the gates.

Ahmad Ajaj, a London-based expert in international relations, told Arab News: “The US Embassy in Baghdad’s green zone is a very sensitive and highly protected area. The attack on the embassy by Iraqi militias loyal to Iran represents a catastrophic and unprecedented failure in international relations, and consequently, it places the Iraqi government in an embarrassing position before the world.

“Embassies, according to the Geneva Conventions of 1961, are under the sovereignty of the embassy’s government, and the host countries must provide them with the ultimate protection and prevent any attack against their crew.”

He said there were indications that a decision was taken within the Iraqi establishment to give demonstrators access to the US Embassy, and what happened was similar to an incident in 1979 when Iranian students attacked and occupied the American Embassy in Tehran at the time of Ayatollah Khomeini’s revolution.

“It seems that Iran, through its loyalists, wants to send a message to the US that it still has influence in Iraq and that it can move its tools to attack US interests in the region. It means to tell Trump to deal with it directly or retreat from the economic pressures the US imposes on Iran,” Ajaj added.

“However, I do not think that Trump will back away from his policy of continuing pressure on Iran economically, diplomatically and militarily, especially as he is campaigning for the upcoming US elections.

“I expect the US to escalate and take up the issue to the UN Security Council and accuse Iran directly of being behind it … diplomatically, the US is expected to mobilize the support of its European allies in order to support it in its campaign against Iran, especially since what happened is contrary to international law and will be condemned by the international community.”

On Monday, US State Department officials said Washington had shown restraint and patience in the face of escalating provocations from Iran or Iranian-backed groups, but that it was time to re-establish deterrence against Tehran’s aggression.

“We had very much hoped that Iran would not miscalculate and confuse our restraint for weakness. But after so many attacks it was important for the president to direct our armed forces to respond in a way that the Iranian regime will understand,” Brian Hook, the US special representative for Iran, told reporters.

(With agencies)


Rubio says new governance bodies for Gaza will be in place soon

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Rubio says new governance bodies for Gaza will be in place soon

  • Rubio said progress had been made recently in identifying Palestinians to join the technocratic group and that Washington aimed to get the governance bodies in place “very soon,” without offering a specific timeline.

WASHINGTON: US Secretary of State Marco Rubio said that a ​new governance structure for Gaza — made up of an international board and a group of Palestinian technocrats — would be in place soon, followed by the deployment of foreign troops, as the US hopes to cement a fragile ceasefire in Israel’s war in the Palestinian enclave. 
Rubio, speaking at a year-end news conference, said the status quo was not sustainable in Gaza, where Israel has continued to strike Hamas targets while the group has reasserted its control since the October peace agreement ‌brokered by the US.
“That’s why we have a sense of ‌urgency about ​bringing ‌phase one to its full completion, which is the establishment of the Board of Peace, and the establishment of the Palestinian technocratic authority or organization that’s going to be on the ground, and then the stabilization force comes closely thereafter,” Rubio said.
Rubio said progress had been made recently in identifying Palestinians to join the technocratic group and that Washington aimed to get the governance bodies in place “very soon,” without offering a specific timeline. Rubio was speaking after the US Central Command hosted a conference in Doha this week with partner nations to plan ‌the International Stabilization Force for Gaza. 
Two US officials said last week that international troops could be deployed in the strip as early as next month, following the UN Security Council’s November vote to authorize the force.
It remains unclear how Hamas will be disarmed, and countries considering contributing troops to the ISF are wary that Hamas will engage their soldiers in combat.
Rubio did not specify who would be responsible for disarming Hamas and conceded that countries contributing troops want to know the ISF’s specific mandate and how it will be funded. 
“I think ⁠we owe them a few more answers before we can ask anybody to commit firmly, but I feel very confident that we have a number of nation states acceptable to all sides in this who are willing to step forward and be a part of that stabilization force,” Rubio said, noting that Pakistan was among the countries that had expressed interest.
Establishing security and governance was key to securing donor funding for reconstruction in Gaza, Rubio added.
“Who’s going to pledge billions of dollars to build things that are going to get blown up again because a war starts?” Rubio said, discussing the possibility of a donor conference to raise reconstruction funds. 
“They want to know ‌who’s in charge, and they want to know that there’s security so and that there’ll be long term stability.”