Guardian accused of spreading far-right ‘fake news’

Paul Golding, leader of the far-right organization Britain First, in central London. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 31 December 2019
Follow

Guardian accused of spreading far-right ‘fake news’

  • Britain First now makes up a sizeable proportion of its (the Conservative Party) members

LONDON: The Guardian is facing accusations of uncritically repeating far-right propaganda. On Saturday, the British newspaper reported a claim made by far-right organization Britain First that 5,000 of its members had joined the center-right Conservative Party, which won a landslide in the Dec. 12 general election. 

The Guardian article, by Mark Townsend, said Britain First were “attracted by what they describe as (Prime Minister) Boris Johnson’s negative attitude toward Islam.” 

The article added that the group had claimed that about two-thirds of its “7,500 signed-up members” had joined the Tories since the election victory. 

Britain First describes itself as a “patriotic political party that will put our own people first.” It has been criticized for its uniformed political marches in Muslim-majority areas. 

Townsend claimed that “the mass defection of Britain First supporters confirms the backing of Johnson by far-right figures following his election triumph.” 

However, critics have questioned the claims. “People should take this story with a pinch of salt,” said Nick Lowles, an anti-fascist campaigner with Hope not Hate. “Britain First doesn’t have 5,000 members. Not now, not ever.” 

Hope not Hate, an expert group on British fascism, says Britain First has no more than 1,000 members. 

In a 2015 op-ed published by The Guardian, Matthew Collins described Britain First as a “one-man band.”

He ridiculed The Sun newspaper for uncritically publishing the group’s claim that it had 6,000 members, despite the fact that it only managed to gather 60 people on a march through the town of Rochester ahead of an election. Its candidate received 56 votes.

 The Guardian now appears to be aiding Britain First’s media strategy. One commenter tweeted: “It’s incredibly frustrating watching people who should know better boosting Britain First’s propaganda because it happens to be politically expedient.”

The Guardian’s piece has been shared by Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn and Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell. 

Corbyn said: “The far right is on the rise, emboldened by a prime minister who has divided our communities.” 

McDonnell said: “Britain First now makes up a sizeable proportion of its (the Conservative Party) members.” 

No evidence has been provided by The Guardian, Britain First or the Labour leadership to support these claims.


Saudi Media Forum urges ethical coverage as crises redefine Arab journalism

Updated 04 February 2026
Follow

Saudi Media Forum urges ethical coverage as crises redefine Arab journalism

  • Raw news without context can mislead audiences and distort credibility, experts say

RIYADH: Arab media was born in crisis and shaped by conflict rather than stability, Malik Al-Rougi, general manager of Thaqafeyah Channel, said during the Saudi Media Forum in Riyadh on Wednesday.

Al-Rougi was speaking during a panel titled “Media and Crises: The Battle for Awareness and the Challenges of Responsible Coverage,” which examined how news organizations across the region navigated credibility and professional standards amid fast-moving regional developments.

“Today, when you build a media organization and invest in it for many years, a single crisis can destroy it,” he said.

Referring to recent events, Al-Rougi said that he had witnessed news channels whose credibility “collapsed overnight.”

“In journalistic and political terms, this is not a process of news production. It is a process of propaganda production,” he said. “The damage caused by such a post … is enormous for an institution in which millions, perhaps billions, have been invested.”

When a media outlet shifts from professionalism and credibility toward “propaganda,” he added, it moves away from its core role. 

Saudi media leaders, journalists, and experts gathered at the Saudi Media Forum in Riyadh to discuss credibility, ethics, and innovation. (AN photo by Huda Bashatah/Supplied)

“A crisis can work for you or against you,” Al-Rougi added. “When, in the heart of a crisis, you demonstrate high credibility and composure, you move light-years ahead. When you fail to adhere to ethical standards, you lose light-years as well.”

Abdullah Al-Assaf, professor of political media studies at Imam Muhammad bin Saud Islamic University, said that in many crises across the Arab world, agendas and directives had often prevailed over professionalism.

“Credibility was buried,” he added.

Hasan Al-Mustafa, writer and researcher at Al-Arabiya channel, said that raw information could be subject to multiple interpretations if not placed within a proper political, security, historical or geographical context.

He added that such an approach was urgently needed during periods of political and security volatility in the Middle East. 

When, in the heart of a crisis, you demonstrate high credibility and composure, you move light-years ahead. When you fail to adhere to ethical standards, you lose light-years as well.

Malik Al-Rougi Thaqafeyah, Channel general manager

“This objectivity, or this reliability, is a great responsibility,” Al-Mustafa said. “It is reflected not only in its impact on the audience, but also on the credibility of the content creator.”

Al-Mustafa warned against populism and haste in coverage, saying that they risked deepening crises rather than providing informed public perspectives.

He also said that competition with social media influencers had pushed some traditional outlets to imitate influencer-driven models instead of strengthening their own professional standards.

“Our media has been crisis-driven for decades,” he said, describing much of the region’s coverage as reactive rather than proactive.

During a separate panel titled “The Official Voice in the Digital Age: Strategies of Influence,” speakers discussed how rapid technological and social changes were reshaping the role of institutional spokespersons.

Abdulrahman Alhusain, official spokesperson of the Saudi Ministry of Commerce, said that the role was no longer limited to delivering statements or reacting to events.

“Today, the spokesperson must be the director of the scene — the director of the media narrative,” he said.

Audiences, he added, no longer accept isolated pieces of information unless they were presented within a clear narrative and structure.

“In the past, a spokesperson was expected to deliver formal presentations. Today, what is required is dialogue. The role may once required defense, but now it must involve discussion, the exchange of views, and open, candid conversation aimed at development — regardless of how harsh the criticism may be.”

He said that spokespersons must also be guided by data, digital indicators and artificial intelligence to understand public opinion before speaking.

“You must choose the right timing, the right method and the right vocabulary. You must anticipate a crisis before it happens. That is your role.”

Abdullah Aloraij, general manager of media at the Riyadh Region Municipality, said that the most important skill for a spokesperson today was the ability to analyze and monitor public discourse.

“The challenge is not in transferring words, but in transferring understanding and impact in the right way,” he said.