Stars discuss new feature-length ‘Breaking Bad’ sequel ‘El Camino’

‘An emotional journey’ — Aaron Paul on returning to play Jesse Pinkman. (Supplied)
Updated 25 October 2019
Follow

Stars discuss new feature-length ‘Breaking Bad’ sequel ‘El Camino’

LOS ANGELES: Endings are hard. Just ask the writers of “Game of Thrones,” the finale of which tarnished the legacy of the entire phenomenon for many. For a piece of entertainment that is globally popular, that has fans speculating wildly over what might happen next, it can seem impossible to find a satisfying conclusion. “Lost” couldn’t do it. “The Sopranos” couldn’t either. “Breaking Bad,” of course, made it look easy.

“Breaking Bad” told the story of a high-school science teacher, Walter White (Bryan Cranston), who is told that he’s dying of cancer. Distraught that he will leave nothing to his family when he goes, he cooks up a plan to produce and sell illegal substances with his ex-student Jesse Pinkman (Aaron Paul), slowly morphing into a murderous villain in the process.

“‘Breaking Bad’ has a pretty serious legacy. They nailed that landing in the perfect way. They really ended it so beautifully, and everyone thought it was great,” Paul told Arab News. “So why revisit this world?”




“Breaking Bad” told the story of a high-school science teacher who is told that he’s dying of cancer. (Supplied)

While it’s true that the final episode brought the story of Walter White to a suitably dramatic end, the answer to Paul’s question lies in another question, one that — even years after the show finished in 2013 — people were still asking. Even the show’s stars.

“Everybody, including me, has asked, ‘What happened to Jesse Pinkman? Did Jesse make it out alive?’” says Cranston.

“[Series creator Vince Gilligan] answers that in ‘El Camino,’” says Paul.




The teacher cooks up a plan to produce and sell illegal substances with his ex-student. (Supplied)

‘El Camino,’ a feature film now available on Netflix in the Middle East, picks up moments after the series finished, following Jesse’s escape from the clutches of his kidnappers with the help of Walter White — and on the run from both criminals and authorities alike.

A few years ago, he says, Paul got a call from Gilligan, who had just gotten an idea for how to continue Jesse’s story. He said yes immediately.

“He told me what he was thinking and of course I said, ‘Whatever it is, Vince, it’s a yes.’ I would follow him into a fire. I trust him that much,” Paul says. “He said, ‘I don’t want to put the cart before the horse, but if I crack it, we’ll do it. But I won’t do it unless it’s perfect.’ And here we are!”

When Paul first read the script, he knew nothing about where the story might go.




It can seem impossible to find a satisfying conclusion for "Breaking Bad." (Supplied)

“I was just along for the ride,” he says. “My heart was racing through the whole thing and I read it straight through. I’m an emotional man and so it was definitely an emotional journey for me, and I think it will be for most of our fans. Vince is exactly right. He would not do it unless it was perfect, and I truly think it is. I think our fans will be so thrilled to see this next chapter. I think that once they see it they’ll realize that they needed it in their life. The show ended so flawlessly, but it really gives some closure for this character and for our audience.”

For Gilligan, he was just happy to be reunited with Paul.

“He was an absolute prince, and the crew loved him so much. He has spoiled me for the future, as I can’t imagine having as good a time with any other actor. It was so great to be working with Aaron again, I can’t even tell you,” says Gilligan. “I’ve had the time of my life.”




‘El Camino,’ a feature film now available on Netflix in the Middle East, picks up moments after the series finished. (Supplied)

While Walter White’s journey saw the character go from a beloved, mild-mannered family man into a ruthless criminal mastermind, Jesse travelled a different path, transformed by the severity of his past actions and the weight of his conscience. The Jesse of “El Camino” wants nothing of the criminal world — he just wants to have a chance at a normal life.

“It follows a man on the run who will truly stop at nothing to finally become free,” says Paul. “What he has to do to become free gets pretty muddy, but he’ll really stop at nothing to make that happen.

“I was wondering if it was going to be as easy as it used to be to jump back into the skin of Pinkman. It has been so many years since I put on those shoes. But after reading the script it was like no time had passed at all. I knew exactly what those moments were going to be, and how I was going to play them, just because I think that Pinkman is so inside of me,” he continues. “It just feels like I’m back home.”


Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

Updated 14 December 2025
Follow

Review: Netflix’s ‘The New Yorker at 100’

  • Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues

Out this month, Netflix’s “The New Yorker at 100” documentary marks the centennial of the weekly that has brought forth arguably some of the most compelling long-form journalism in my lifetime.

As a ferocious reader with an insatiable appetite for print, I vividly recall picking-up a copy of The New Yorker in Saudi Arabia after school as a teen, determined to read it cover-to-cover — only to find myself mentally, intellectually and physically exhausted after deciphering a single lyrical and Herculean-sized long-form piece.

Reading The New Yorker still makes one both feel smarter — and perhaps not smart enough — at the very same time. Just like the documentary.

Much like Vogue’s 2009 documentary, “The September Issue,” which followed (now retired) editor-in-chief Anna Wintour as she prepared for the September 2007 issue; this documentary largely centered on the making of the Feb. 17 & 24, 2025 multi-cover edition.

A quintessentially New York staple that readers either love or loathe — or both — the magazine has long been seen as a highbrow publication for the “elite.”

But The New Yorker is in on the joke. It never did take itself too seriously.

Directed by Marshall Curry, the documentary opened the doors to the publication’s meticulous world, offering viewers a rare look inside the issues within the magazine’s issues.

Narrated by actress Julianne Moore, it included sit-down interviews with famous figures, largely offering gushing testimonials.

It, of course, included many cameos from pop culture references such as from “Seinfeld,” “The Good Place” and others.

It also mentioned New Yorker’s famed late writers Anthony Bourdain and Truman Capote, and Ronan Farrow.

As a journalist myself, I enjoyed the behind-the-scenes peeks into staff meetings and editing discussions, including the line-by-line fact-checking process.

While lovingly headquartered in New York — and now based at One World Trade Center after decades in the heart of Times Square — the magazine has long published dispatches from elsewhere in the country and around the world.

I wish there had been more airtime dedicated to Jeanette “Jane” Cole Grant, who co-founded the magazine with her husband-at-the-time, Harold Ross, during the Roaring Twenties.

Ironically, neither founder hailed from New York — Grant arrived from Missouri at 16 to pursue singing before becoming a journalist on staff at The New York Times — and Ross came from a Colorado mining town.

Perhaps more bizarrely, Ross, who served as the first editor-in-chief of The New Yorker — known today for its intricate reporting and 11 Pulitzer Prizes — had dropped out of school at 13. He served as lead editor for 26 years until his death, guided by instinct and surrounded by talented writers he hired.

As the Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist and the magazine’s fifth editor-in-chief, David Remnick has held the role since 1998. “It is a place that publishes a 15,000-word profile of a musician one week, a 9,000-word account from Southern Lebanon, with gag cartoons interspersed in them,” he said in one scene.

It also offered a glimpse of the leadership of his predecessor, the vivacious and provocative Tina Brown, who served as editor-in-chief for six years starting in 1992.

No woman has held the top editor position before or since her tenure.

Some of the most compelling moments in the documentary, for me, showed journalists scribbling in reporter notebooks in darkened movie theaters, rocking-out in dingy punk shows, and reporting from political rallies while life unfolded around them.

These journalists were not sitting in diners, merely chasing the money or seated in corner offices; they were on the ground, focused on accuracy and texture, intent on portraying what it meant to be a New Yorker who cared about the world, both beyond the city’s borders and within them.

While Arab bylines remain limited, the insights from current marginalized writers and editors showed how the magazine has been trying to diversify and include more contributors of color. They are still working on it.

A century in, this documentary feels like an issue of The New Yorker — except perhaps easier to complete.