Demonstrations flare in India over ‘divisive’ asylum bill

Activists of Students' Federation of India (SFI) burn the effigies of India's Prime Minister and Chief Minister of Assam in Guwahati on January 8, 2019 after India's lower house passed today legislation that will grant citizenship to members of certain religious minorities but not Muslims. (AFP)
Updated 09 January 2019
Follow

Demonstrations flare in India over ‘divisive’ asylum bill

  • Congress claims Citizenship (Amendment) Bill will lead to widespread unrest
  • Minorities are persecuted in Pakistan and other neighboring countries

NEW DELHI: India’s parliamentary lower house on Tuesday passed a controversial bill that gives non-Muslim communities from neighboring Afghanistan, Pakistan and Bangladesh citizenship rights despite strong dissent from opposition parties. 

The opposition called the bill “an attack on the core of the Indian constitution.”

The bill was passed on a day when all seven northeastern states were brought to a standstill by protests over the proposed legislation. 

“The Citizenship (Amendment) Bill is not for Assam alone or for the betterment of migrants coming from a particular country,” the Home Minister Rajnath Singh told Parliament.

“This bill is also for migrants who have come from the western borders and have settled down in Rajasthan, Punjab, New Delhi and Rajasthan,” he said.

“Minorities are persecuted in Pakistan and other neighboring countries. They have faced violence. The bill offers security to persecuted minorities.”

The bill will grant citizenship to Hindus, Sikhs, Buddhists, Jains, Parsis and Christians who fled religious persecution in Bangladesh, Pakistan and Afghanistan and entered India before Dec. 31, 2014. 

However, the opposition Congress Party walked out of Parliament, saying the bill was discriminatory and against the spirit of the constitution.

“The bill will lead to unrest not only in Assam but also in several parts of India,” Mallikarjun Kharge, the party’s parliamentary leader, said.

Saugata Roy, a senior opposition leader with the Trinamool Congress based in West Bengal, condemned what he described “as the most diabolical and divisive bill of the past 70 years.”

“Muslims are not included among the six religions mentioned in the bill. Make it secular. Anyone who comes out of religious persecution should be included if they seek asylum in India,” he said.

While Parliament debated the contentious bill, protests brought states in India’s northeast to a near standstill after student organizations and civil rights groups demanded an 11-hour shutdown.

Assam was worst affected by the strike with some street protests descending into violence. The call for the shutdown was made by the All Assam Student Union (AASU) and several civil rights groups.

“The overwhelming response to the call for the strike shows how agitated the people of Assam are over the Citizenship Bill,” said Sammujal Bhattacharya, an adviser to the AASU.

“The bill is sectarian and communal in nature. In India, citizenship cannot be decided on the basis of religion. We will fight with all that we have,” he said.

Bhattacharya said the Assam accord of 1985 fixed the cut-off date for granting citizenship to people who entered India from Bangladesh as March 1971, and any attempt to tamper with the deadline would be met with resistance.

The BJP government, under the leadership of Prime Minister Narendra Modi, introduced the bill in 2016. 

Critics say that by amending the Citizenship Act, the BJP wants to protect Bengali Hindus who have come from Bangladesh while ignoring Muslims.

Rezaul Karim Sarkar, of the AASU, claimed the bill “will disturb communal harmony in Assam. It will incite violence between Hindu and Muslim. The BJP is aiming at the 2019 elections and wants to win on the basis of religious violence.”

However, the Bengali United Forum of Assam said the bill will help Hindu Bengalis “live a respectable life.”

Mahananda Sarkar Dutta, the forum’s chief coordinator, said: “We are not part of the BJP or any political party. The people of Assam should not blame us for the bill. Other communities will also benefit,” he said.


Anger over Minneapolis shooting probe fuels protests

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Anger over Minneapolis shooting probe fuels protests

  • Federal immigration officers armed with pepperball guns and tear gas clashed with the noisy crowd
  • After he passes in front of the car, another agent can be heard ordering Good to exit the vehicle before she tries to drive off and shots ring out

MINNEAPOLIS: Local officials in Minneapolis slammed federal agencies Friday for excluding them from the probe into an immigration officer’s fatal shooting of a woman, as public outrage grew ahead of planned weekend protests.
Officials in the midwestern state of Minnesota said their law enforcement agencies have been excluded from the investigation into the killing of motorist Renee Good by a federal immigration officer on Wednesday.
A local prosecutor said Friday that federal investigators had taken Good’s car and the shell casings from the scene.
The Trump administration has sought to paint the victim as a “domestic terrorist,” insisting that the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) agent who fatally shot her was acting in self-defense.
Cell phone footage apparently taken by the officer who fired the fatal shots shows him interacting with Good as he approaches and circles her car, and her saying, “I’m not mad at you.”
After he passes in front of the car, another agent can be heard ordering Good to exit the vehicle before she tries to drive off and shots ring out.
The White House insisted the video gave weight to the officer’s claim of self-defense — even though the clip does not show the moment the car moved away, or him opening fire.
“This is not the time to bend the rules. This is a time to follow the law... The fact that Pam Bondi’s Department of Justice and this presidential administration has already come to a conclusion about those facts is deeply concerning,” Minneapolis Mayor Jacob Frey, a Democrat, told a briefing on Friday.
“We know that they’ve already determined much of the investigation,” he said, adding that the state’s Bureau of Criminal Apprehension, within its department of public safety, has consistently run such investigations.
“Why not include them in the process?” Frey said.
On Thursday, US Vice President JD Vance said that the ICE officer, named in US media as Jonathan Ross, had “absolute immunity” — a claim disputed by local prosecutors.
Court filings seen by AFP showed that in June 2025, Ross was dragged 100 yards along a road by a car driven by a man who was the subject of immigration enforcement activity.
“When the FBI, when the federal agencies, say they won’t share evidence with the local authorities, the public can’t trust that it’s going to be a true, transparent investigation,” said local Patrick O’Shaughnessy, 43.

- ‘Get out’ -

Minnesota officials have said that local investigators were initially invited by the FBI to participate in the inquiry into the shooting of Good, but were subsequently blocked from taking part.
Good, 37, was shot in the head as she apparently tried to drive away from ICE in the Midwestern US city as officers approached her car, which they said blocked their way.
Good was one of four people who have been killed by ICE since Trump launched his immigration crackdown.
Good’s wife Becca Good told local media that they had gone to the scene of immigration enforcement activity to “support our neighbors.”
“We had whistles. They had guns,” she said.
Local prosecutor Mary Moriarty, the Hennepin County attorney, said “our goal must be that a thorough investigation is completed at the local level.”
“The FBI currently has, for example, Ms Good’s car, the shell casings and witness interviews.”
Moriarty unveiled an online evidence portal, calling for submissions so that all available leads could be compiled.
She added that she hoped federal authorities would reconsider and “at least” give local detectives access to evidence.
Protest action continued Friday with hundreds gathering at a federal facility that has become a focal point of anti-ICE demonstrations with at least one detention seen.
Federal immigration officers armed with pepperball guns and tear gas clashed with the noisy crowd.
There were some 1,000 weekend protest gatherings planned across the United States, according to organizers.
“You can’t trust anything that (the Trump administration) say, they have their own agenda, and I think they’re drunk on power quite clearly,” said master gardener Kate Netwal, 66.