“I don’t want to remember the past by talking about it“

Indian minister of external affairs Sushma Swaraj meets on Wednesday, 19 December 2018 in New Delhi Indian citizen Hamid Ansari after his release from Pakistan jail. Ansari was accused of espionage, and spent 6 years in prison. (Video grab, ANI)
Updated 19 December 2018
Follow

“I don’t want to remember the past by talking about it“

  • Indian national repatriated from Pakistan after spending six years in jail
  • Details ordeal during private meeting with top minister

DELHI: Some things are better left unsaid.
That’s the reasoning former Indian prisoner Hamid Ansari offered for refusing to divulge details of his experience after spending six years in jail in Pakistan.
He was finally repatriated to India on Tuesday. For now, he says he’s just happy to be back home.
On Wednesday, the 33-year-old engineer met India’s External Affairs Minister, Sushma Swaraj, in New Delhi and narrated the trauma that he went through in the past six years.
Meanwhile, his family expressed their gratitude to Swaraj for facilitating Hamid’s repatriation to India.
“I am happy to be back in India,” Hamid told reporters after his return to Delhi. He refused to talk about his ordeal adding: “I don’t want to remember the past by talking about my experience.”

During his meeting with Swaraj, which lasted for half an hour, Hamid got emotional, saying he was “sorry” for the trouble he had caused his family and the government.
His mother, Fauzia Ansari, profusely thanked Swaraj for facilitating her son’s return. “My son has come back from the jaws of death. He has got a new life,” she said during her interaction with the foreign minister.
Swaraj, on her part, asked Hamid to “forget the past as a bad phase in your life and focus on the future”.
Hamid served three years in the Peshawar Central Jail after being sentenced by a military court in 2015 for possessing a fake identity card.
In search of a better livelihood, he had reportedly left his hometown of Mumbai in India to look for a job in Afghanistan.
In 2012, however, he allegedly entered Kohat, in Pakistan’s Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, to meet a girl he had befriended on social media.
Pakistan, however, said that Hamid was an Indian spy who had illegally entered the country while accusing him of being involved in anti-state crimes and forgery, prior to sentencing him to six years in jail.
His jail term ended on December 15 following which a Pakistani court gave the government a month’s time to complete formalities and deport him to India.
Hamid’s release attracted widespread media attention in India with several newspapers and TV channels headlining the story.


UK upper house approves social media ban for under-16s

Updated 22 January 2026
Follow

UK upper house approves social media ban for under-16s

LONDON: Britain’s upper house of parliament voted Wednesday in favor of banning under?16s from using social media, raising pressure on the government to match a similar ban passed in Australia.
Prime Minister Keir Starmer said Monday he was not ruling out any options and pledged action to protect children, but his government wants to wait for the results of a consultation due this summer before legislating.
Calls have risen across the opposition and within the governing Labour party for the UK to follow Australia, where under-16s have been barred from social media applications since December 10.
The amendment from opposition Conservative lawmaker John Nash passed with 261 votes to 150 in the House of Lords, co?sponsored by a Labour and a Liberal Democrat peer.
“Tonight, peers put our children’s future first,” Nash said. “This vote begins the process of stopping the catastrophic harm that social media is inflicting on a generation.”
Before the vote, Downing Street said the government would not accept the amendment, which now goes to the Labour-controlled lower House of Commons. More than 60 Labour MPs have urged Starmer to back a ban.
Public figures including actor Hugh Grant urged the government to back the proposal, saying parents alone cannot counter social media harms.
Some child-protection groups warn a ban would create a false sense of security.
A YouGov poll in December found 74 percent of Britons supported a ban. The Online Safety Act requires secure age?verification for harmful content.