Poor maintenance blamed for deadly Calcutta bridge collapse

Up to 20 people were feared trapped under the debris. (Courtesy Twitter)
Updated 05 September 2018
Follow

Poor maintenance blamed for deadly Calcutta bridge collapse

  • Dramatic footage captured on a security camera shows how a busy Calcutta street turned into carnage
  • Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said the first priority was to rescue the injured and those who were trapped

DUBAI: Poor maintenance has been blamed for a bridge collapse that has killed at least five people in south Calcutta, in the state of West Bengal in eastern India.
Images of the Majerhat road bridge show a broken section of the 40-year old highway that appears to be roughly 30 meters long.
Speaking to the Arab News, a Calcutta resident who did not wish to be identified said: “There is total pandemonium in the area with distraught bystanders present and rescue teams trying to manage the situation. This is hampering rescue operations.”
He added that the death toll was expected to rise, as rescue workers struggled to rescue any survivors.
“There is speculation that the maintenance work on many bridges in the city of Calcutta has not been regular,” he added. “The onus falls on the authorities. The Majerhat bridge is a case in point. The volume of heavy and light traffic over the bridge has increased over the years since it connects two parts of the city. This traffic has not been regulated or controlled. The number of cars plying over it has obviously increased and thousands commute daily over the bridge.”
Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee said the first priority was to rescue the injured and those who were trapped, according to a Press Trust of India report.
The bridge, that collapsed at around midday on Tuesday, was built in the late 70s, according to Calcutta resident Jason Pote.
“At that time, the area was not developed since the city had not witnessed the construction and residential boom then. This bridge was built for low-volume traffic. The gradual increase in traffic occurred with the construction of a free port area nearby. Port containers and other heavy cargo then began to move across this bridge at nights to be offloaded at other parts of the city. The lack of maintenance therefore made it an accident waiting to happen.”
Pote added that the crash “would affect a lot of people. The Majerhat bridge and a parallel bridge, the Durgapur Bridge, carry people from the developed areas to the central business districts of Calcutta.
“People will now find it tough to reach their destinations. There are very little options. The local police will be under pressure to regulate alternative traffic routes in a city which is renowned for traffic jams.
“There are six schools on the main road itself. So, from 8 a.m. - 8.30 a.m. there will be mayhem since it is school times. Each school has probably around 2,000 students and this is a conservative number. This means 10,000 passengers travelling daily in over 2,500-3,000 vehicles looking for alternative routes which will be affected.”
Arab News tried to contact Derek O’Brien, a member of Parliament and spokesman for the All-India Trinamool Congress, the ruling party in West Bengal, but was unable to get a comment.


House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

Updated 12 February 2026
Follow

House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

WASHINGTON: The House voted Wednesday to slap back President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada, a rare if largely symbolic rebuke of the White House agenda as Republicans joined Democrats over the objections of GOP leadership.
The tally, 219-211, was among the first times the House, controlled by Republicans, has confronted the president over a signature policy, and drew instant recrimination from Trump himself. The resolution seeks to end the national emergency Trump declared to impose the tariffs, though actually undoing the policy would require support from the president, which is highly unlikely. It next goes to the Senate.
Trump believes in the power of tariffs to force US trade partners to the negotiating table. But lawmakers are facing unrest back home from businesses caught in the trade wars and constituents navigating pocketbook issues and high prices.
“Today’s vote is simple, very simple: Will you vote to lower the cost of living for the American family or will you keep prices high out of loyalty to one person — Donald J. Trump?” said Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who authored the resolution.
Within minutes, as the gavel struck, Trump fired off a stern warning to those in the Republican Party who would dare to cross him.
“Any Republican, in the House or the Senate, that votes against TARIFFS will seriously suffer the consequences come Election time, and that includes Primaries!” the president posted on social media.
The high-stakes moment provides a snapshot of the House’s unease with the president’s direction, especially ahead of the midterm elections as economic issues resonate among voters. The Senate has already voted to reject Trump’s tariffs on Canada and other countries in a show of displeasure. But both chambers would have to approve the tariff rollbacks, and send the resolution to Trump for the president’s signature — or veto.
Six House Republicans voted for the resolution, and one Democrat voted against it.
From Canada, Ontario, Premier Doug Ford on social media called the vote “an important victory with more work ahead.” He thanked lawmakers from both parties “who stood up in support of free trade and economic growth between our two great countries. Let’s end the tariffs and together build a more prosperous and secure future.”
Trump recently threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff on goods imported from Canada over that country’s proposed China trade deal, intensifying a feud with the longtime US ally and Prime Minister Mark Carney.
GOP defections forced the vote
House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to prevent this showdown.
Johnson insisted lawmakers wait for a pending Supreme Court ruling in a lawsuit about the tariffs. He engineered a complicated rules change to prevent floor action. But Johnson’s strategy collapsed late Tuesday, as Republicans peeled off during a procedural vote to ensure the Democratic measure was able to advance.
“The president’s trade policies have been of great benefit,” Johnson, R-Louisiana, had said. “And I think the sentiment is that we allow a little more runway for this to be worked out between the executive branch and the judicial branch.”
Late Tuesday evening, Johnson could be seen speaking to holdout Republican lawmakers as the GOP leadership team struggled to shore up support during a lengthy procedural vote, but the numbers lined up against him.
“We’re disappointed,” Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House’s National Economic Council, told reporters at the White House on Wednesday morning. “The president will make sure they don’t repeal his tariffs.”
Terminating Trump’s emergency
The resolution put forward by Meeks would terminate the national emergency that Trump declared a year ago as one of his executive orders.
The administration claimed illicit drug flow from Canada constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat that allows the president to slap tariffs on imported goods outside the terms of the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.
The Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, said the flow of fentanyl into the US is a dire national emergency and the policy must be left in place.
“Let’s be clear again about what this resolution is and what it’s not. It’s not a debate about tariffs. You can talk about those, but that’s not really what it is,” Mast said. “This is Democrats trying to ignore that there is a fentanyl crisis.”
Experts say fentanyl produced by cartels in Mexico is largely smuggled into the US from land crossings in California and Arizona. Fentanyl is also made in Canada and smuggled into the US, but to a much lesser extent.
Torn between Trump and tariffs
Ahead of voting, some rank-and-file Republican lawmakers expressed unease over the choices ahead as Democrats — and a few renegade Republicans — impressed on their colleagues the need to flex their power as the legislative branch rather than ceding so much power to the president to take authority over trade and tariff policy.
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, said he was unpersuaded by Johnson’s call to wait until the Supreme Court makes its decision about the legality of Trump’s tariffs. He voted for passage.
“Why doesn’t the Congress stand on its own two feet and say that we’re an independent branch?” Bacon said. “We should defend our authorities. I hope the Supreme Court does, but if we don’t do it, shame on us.”
Bacon, who is retiring rather than facing reelection, also argued that tariffs are bad economic policy.
Other Republicans had to swiftly make up their minds after Johnson’s gambit — which would have paused the calendar days to prevent the measure from coming forward — was turned back.
“At the end of the day, we’re going to have to support our president,” said Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas.
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said he doesn’t want to tie the president’s hands on trade and would support the tariffs on Canada “at this time.”