Italy bridge operator focus of anger as collapse death toll rises

A view of the Morandi highway bridge that collapsed in Genoa, northern Italy, Wednesday, Aug. 15, 2018. (AP)
Updated 15 August 2018
Follow

Italy bridge operator focus of anger as collapse death toll rises

  • The 50-year-old bridge collapsed during torrential rain on Tuesday
  • The bridge’s condition have been a focus of public debate since Tuesday’s collapse

GENOA, Italy: Rescuers hunted for survivors among towering slabs of wreckage on Wednesday after a bridge collapse that killed 39, as furious government ministers rounded on the viaduct’s operator, saying it should pay fines and compensation and lose its concession.
The 50-year-old bridge, part of a toll motorway linking the port city of Genoa with southern France, collapsed during torrential rain on Tuesday, sending dozens of vehicles crashing onto a riverbed, a railway and two warehouses.
Eye-witness Ivan, 37, evacuated on Tuesday from the nearby building where he works, described the collapse as unbelievable.
“To see a pylon come down like papier-mâché is an incredible thing,” he said. “It’s been a lifetime that we’ve known there were problems. It is in continual maintenance.”
“In the ‘90s they added some reinforcements on one part, but also underneath you can see rust.”
As cranes moved in to shift truck-sized chunks of broken concrete, hundreds of firefighters searched for survivors, while public shock and grief turned to anger over the state of the 1.2 km-long bridge, completed in 1967 and overhauled two years ago.
Italian Transport Minister Danilo Toninelli, visiting the disaster scene, said bridge operator Autostrade per l’Italia would have to contribute to the cost of its reconstruction as well as pay heavy fines.
But Autostrade, a unit of Milan-listed Atlantia group , said it had done regular, sophisticated checks on the structure before the disaster, relying on “companies and institutions which are world leaders in testing and inspections” and that these had provided reassuring results.
“These outcomes have formed the basis for maintenance work approved by the Transport Ministry in accordance with the law and the terms of the concession aggreement,” it said.
A source close to the matter that Autostrade per l’Italia would hold an extraordinary board meeting next week following the disaster.

WEIGHT OF TRAFFIC
The bridge’s condition, and its ability to sustain large increases in both the intensity and weight of traffic over the years, have been a focus of public debate since Tuesday’s collapse, when an 80-meter span gave way at lunchtime as cars packed with holidaymakers as well as trucks streamed across it.
Salvatore Lorefice, 58, a pensioner who lives a few hundred meters (yards) from the bridge, said cement had fallen off the structure as early as the 1980s when he worked at a warehouse directly under the bridge.
He recalled a visit by a team of Japanese technicians who “came to find out how the structure had deteriorated in such a short time.”
Deputy Prime Minister and Interior Minister Matteo Salvini said the private sector manager of the bridge had earned “billions” from tolls but “did not spend the money they were supposed to” and its concession should be revoked.
He was apparently referring to Autostrade.
“Imposing the highest penalties possible and making sure that those responsible for the dead and the injured pay up for any damages and crimes is the very least,” he said.
The Pope offered a prayer for the victims and their loved ones in a public address at St. Peter’s Basilica.
Fire brigade spokesman Luca Cari said 400 firefighters were at the site, lifting big chunks of concrete to create spaces for rescue teams to check for survivors.
In Paris, France’s foreign ministry said four French nationals were among the dead.
Toninelli earlier said he had begun a process to strip Autostrade of its concession and he demanded top Autostrade managers resign.
“Autostrade per l’Italia was not able to fulfill its obligations under the contract regulating management of this infrastructure,” Toninelli said on RAI 1 state TV, adding he would seek to levy heavy fines against the company that could reach up to 150 million euros.

STRUCTURAL INSPECTIONS
The Morandi Bridge, named after the engineer who designed it, forms part of the A10 motorway run by Autostrade. The 55-km (34 mile) stretch of the A10 accounts for around 1.7 percent of total network traffic for Italy’s biggest toll road operator, according to one analyst’s estimate.
Autostrade’s parent, Atlantia, also runs toll-road concessions in Brazil, Chile, India and Poland.
“The top management of Autostrade per l’Italia must step down first of all,” Toninelli said in a Facebook post.
He also said the government would inspect the structure of aging bridges and tunnels across the country with a view to launching a program of remedial works if required.
Within hours of the disaster, the anti-establishment government that took office in June said the collapse showed Italy needed to spend more on its dilapidated infrastructure, ignoring EU budget constraints if necessary.
Genoa police put the death toll at 39, with 16 injured.


Analysis: Understanding the illegitimacy of Somaliland independence

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Analysis: Understanding the illegitimacy of Somaliland independence

  • Israel’s recognition of Somaliland has drawn condemnation as a violation of international law and Somalia’s sovereignty
  • Regional and global critics warn the move risks militarizing the Red Sea and destabilizing the Horn of Africa

LONDON: For 34 years, the breakaway state of Somaliland, which declared independence from Somalia in 1991, has wandered in the diplomatic wilderness, its claim to sovereignty unrecognized by the entire world.

All that changed on Dec. 26 with the surprise announcement by the Israeli government that it was establishing full diplomatic relations with the territory, which occupies a strategically sensitive position along the northern coast of the Horn of Africa, overlooking the Gulf of Aden and the mouth of the Red Sea.

On Dec. 28, Israel’s Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar, took to Facebook to publish the declaration of recognition, signed by himself and Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.

The recognition, it read, had been made “in light of the shared values, strategic interests, and the spirit of mutual respect that binds our people.”



The relationship, it added, “will contribute to advancing peace, stability, and prosperity in the Horn of Africa, the Middle East, and beyond.”

But for the many international critics of the move, including Turkiye, Saudi Arabia, the EU, the UK, China and the African Union, the Israeli recognition of Somaliland’s sovereignty is likely to only increase tensions in an already turbulent region.

Somalia’s President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud has claimed that, as the price for Israel’s recognition, Somaliland has agreed to accept Palestinians displaced from Gaza by Israel. The Somaliland regime has denied this, but pro-Palestinian states are not convinced.

On Dec. 27, Saudi Arabia was among 21 Arab, Islamic and African nations that issued a joint statement declaring their “unequivocal rejection of Israel’s recognition of the ‘Somaliland’ region of the Federal Republic of Somalia.”

They rejected “any potential link between such a measure and any attempts to forcibly expel the Palestinian people out of their land, which is unequivocally rejected in any form as a matter of principle.”

Israel’s recognition of Somaliland, they added, constituted “a grave violation of the principles of international law and the UN Charter, which explicitly stipulates the imperative of protecting the sovereignty of states and their territorial integrity.”

There would, they added, be “serious repercussions of such an unprecedented measure on peace and security in the Horn of Africa, the Red Sea, and … serious effects on international peace and security as a whole.”

Much of the rest of the world, including Europe, is in lockstep with the Arab states on the issue.



On Dec. 26, the EU issued a statement in which it “reaffirms the importance of respecting the unity, the sovereignty and the territorial integrity of the Federal Republic of Somalia pursuant of its constitution, the Charters of the African Union and the UN.”

It added: “This is key for the peace and stability of the entire Horn of Africa region.”

China, too, has criticized the Israeli move. In a statement, the Foreign Ministry said that “no country should encourage or support other countries’ internal separatist forces for its own selfish interests.”

At a meeting of the UN Security Council on Dec. 29, Khaled Khiari, assistant secretary-general for the Middle East, Asia and the Pacific, relayed Somalia’s indignation at what it called “a deliberate attack” on its sovereignty.

Khiari said Somalia had “also underscored that it would not permit the establishment of any foreign military bases or arrangements that would draw the country into proxy conflicts.”

Somalia declared that “no external actor has the authority” to alter its territorial configuration.



The UK was among numerous countries that spoke up for Somalia, with its charge d’affaires reaffirming his country’s continuing “support for the sovereignty, territorial integrity, political independence, and unity of Somalia.”

The UK, added Ambassador James Kariuki, “does not recognize Somaliland’s independence.

“We maintain that any change to Somaliland’s status depends on mutual agreement between Mogadishu and Hargeisa, through dialogue, and must conform to the purposes and principles of the UN Charter.”

Israel’s Sa’ar, who visited Somaliland on Tuesday, brushed aside the chorus of criticism. “Somaliland was not created this past weekend,” he wrote on Facebook. “It has existed as a functioning state for more than 34 years.

“The attacks on Israel’s recognition of Somaliland are hypocritical. Only Israel will decide who to recognize and with whom to maintain diplomatic relations.”

Netanyahu, meanwhile, has said he only wants to “support a democratic, moderate country, a Muslim country, that wants to join the Abraham Accords.”



But some observers believe Israel may be planning to use Somaliland as a military base from which to attack the Houthis in Yemen. Since 2023, the Houthis have launched several missile attacks on Israel, and Israel has struck many targets in Yemen in response.

Now the Houthis have warned that any Israeli military presence in Somaliland would be considered a target, which puts Somalis in the firing line of a war that has nothing to do with them.

Israel’s act of recognition appears likely to stoke tensions in the region.

For example, relations between Somalia and Ethiopia, its western neighbor, are already fraught following talks between Somaliland and Addis Ababa aimed at giving the landlocked state access to the Red Sea.

Ethiopia lost its own coastline in 1993 when its northern region of Eritrea declared independence.

The plan to give Ethiopia a naval base on Somaliland’s Red Sea coast is bitterly opposed by Somalia, which resents what it sees as its territory being given away.

It has also angered Egypt. Cairo has its own dispute with Ethiopia over the Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam, which the country has built on the Blue Nile and which Egypt says is threatening its water supplies.

The region’s current crisis is rooted in colonialism.



Before the European “scramble for Africa,” there was no central “Somalian” state. Instead, a region roughly equivalent to modern-day Somaliland, Somalia, Djibouti, the eastern Ogaden region of Ethiopia and parts of northern Kenya was occupied by scattered groups of Somali-speaking pastoral tribes.

In the 19th century, European powers divided up the area into French Somaliland (Djibouti) in the extreme northwest, British Somaliland (today’s Somaliland), and Italian Somaliland (now Somalia).

The British and Italian-held territories gained their independence in 1960 and came together briefly as the Somali Republic. The union proved fragile, however, and in 1969 ended with the assassination of President Abdirashid Ali Sharmarke and a subsequent military coup.

The leader of the coup was Mohamed Siad Barre, the commander of the army, who declared himself president.

In 1991, widespread anger at the regime escalated into civil war. Barre fled to Kenya (reportedly in a tank loaded with millions of dollars of the state’s money), and the government collapsed.

This was the moment, in May 1991, that political leaders in the former British Somaliland declared independence as the Republic of Somaliland, an entity that until now had received no international recognition.

Abdirahman Sahal Yusuf, former media adviser to the Office of the Prime Minister of Somalia and editor of the Qiraat Somali online news platform, says it is clear that “Israel has no right to recognize Somaliland. It is a move that violates international law.”



In doing so, he told Arab News, he believes Israel has two strategic goals: “Establishing a military base in this region to confront the Houthis, but at the same time there is an agreement to transfer Palestinians to Somaliland, which is a red line.”

Establishing an Israeli military base in Somaliland, he said, “would pose a threat to the national security of Egypt and Saudi Arabia, since this region is very sensitive.

“Israel wants to move its battles to this region, ruining Arab national security and dividing countries. The unity of Somalia must be protected.”

For Abdihakim Kalale, an Ethiopian political and security analyst, “the core issue is not recognition itself. States recognize one another, exchange interests, and recalibrate alliances as part of normal international politics.

“The problem lies in how Israel recognized Somaliland and the assumptions that informed that decision.”

Israel, he told Arab News, “appears to have treated Somaliland as a single, unified separatist movement. In reality, it is neither politically nor socially homogeneous. Fragmentation exists, not only in the east, but also in the west.”

In western Somaliland, two major clans inhabiting territories that represent roughly 15-20 percent of the claimed area have not fully integrated into the Somaliland system.

“These groups are actively pursuing the creation of a separate federal member state aligned with Mogadishu rather than Hargeisa. This alone demonstrates that Somaliland lacks internal political cohesion.”



In the east, the situation is even more fragmented. Here, following clan-based fighting in 2023, “a new federal member state, the Northeastern State of Somalia, emerged from territories internationally referred to as Somaliland.

“This entity is now aligned with Mogadishu and exercises effective control over large areas where the Somaliland government has no presence. These eastern territories account for approximately 40 to 45 percent of the land Somaliland claims.”

Furthermore, he said: “Somaliland is neither institutionally nor socially prepared to be integrated into larger geopolitical frameworks such as the Abraham Accords,” which Netanyahu has suggested is on the cards.

“Israel engaged with a leadership eager for recognition but lacking the capacity to manage the profound internal and regional consequences that recognition entails. This creates a governance vacuum that radical and violent actors are well positioned to exploit.

“There is a real risk that this decision could accelerate radicalization and a region long regarded as relatively stable compared to southern Somalia could, in the coming years, evolve into a new security hotspot.”

Liban Abd Ali, a consultant and former media and communications director in the Office of the Prime Minister of Somalia, agrees that Israeli recognition of the breakaway territory is “a very bad move.

“It’s a violation of a sovereign state and a violation of international laws and norms, and Israel is going to divide Somalia’s territorial integrity, fuel conflicts and destroy domestic cohesion,” he told Arab News.



He believes “the main objective is to forcibly move over 1.5 million Palestinians from their own land to northern Somalia.

“They also want to use this area as a launchpad for their fight against the Houthis in Yemen, and beyond that to control the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea. Israel’s main goal is to destabilize the region by dividing countries.”