US judge calls ‘zero tolerance’ immigration policy ‘cruel’

1 / 2
One of Pablo Villavicencio's daughters, center, looks at her dad while he leans out of an SUV while talking to reporters after he was released from the Hudson County Correctional Facility, in this July 24, 2018 photo, in Kearny, N.J. (AP)
2 / 2
Undocumented immigrant families are released from detention at a bus depot in McAllen, Texas, US, in this July 27, 2018 photo. (REUTERS)
Updated 02 August 2018
Follow

US judge calls ‘zero tolerance’ immigration policy ‘cruel’

  • Pablo Villavicencio was detained June 1 after delivering pizza to a Brooklyn Army installation

NEW YORK: A New York judge who ordered an Ecuadorean immigrant who delivered pizza to an Army installation freed from an immigration detention camp said Wednesday that the government was applying its “zero tolerance” policy toward illegal entry in a “thoughtless and cruel” manner.
US District Judge Paul Crotty explained in a written opinion why he ordered Pablo Villavicencio freed last week from a detention center in New Jersey.
He also nullified a “supervised release” order Villavicencio was told to sign before he was freed that set special conditions he must follow.
In the opinion, Crotty took a swipe at the government’s decision to separate some children from their parents at the Mexican border and then transport the children to New York, saying he did not believe “this is accidental or random.”
Instead, he wrote, the government may be trying to break detainees’ connections to their support system of families and friends and frustrate their ability to retain competent legal representation and effectively participate in legal proceedings. In Villavicencio’s case, the government tried to move the case to a New Jersey court.
In a footnote, Crotty said the behavior reminded him that Thomas Jefferson cited in the Declaration of Independence how colonists were tried in “remote locations” to obstruct the laws for naturalization of foreigners.
“Immigration was even then a critical issue,” Crotty said.
Villavicencio, 35, who is married to a US citizen with two young girls who also are citizens, is trying to establish legal residency. He was arrested and detained June 1 after delivering pizza to the Army garrison in Fort Hamilton.
When he arrived at the installation, guards requested identification, and he produced a city identification card. A background check showed he had been ordered to leave the US in 2010 but stayed. He unlawfully entered the country in 2008.
Crotty ordered him freed a week ago and said he would explain his reasoning later.
Crotty wrote that there was no justification for Villavicencio’s detention and said the man had earned a right to apply to stay in the country legally under a special program set up for individuals in his situation.
“It should not be difficult to discern that families should be kept together rather than be separated by the thoughtless and cruel application of a so called ‘zero tolerance’ policy,” Crotty wrote. “This is especially so where the organization seeking removal has also provided a pathway for a person in petitioner’s position to regularize his immigration status with minimal disruption to his family life.”
He added that Villavicencio “deserves it due to his hard work, his dedication to the family, and his clean criminal record.”
The judge called Villavicencio’s arrest a “mercurial exercise of executive power.”
He said the government had given Villavicencio no explanation or justification to deny him a chance to apply through a program it had established.
“It is not unlike giving a person a job, and then taking away the tools necessary to perform the job. It is simply not right,” Crotty said.
Attorney General Jeff Sessions ordered the “zero tolerance” policy in April.
Through a spokesman, government lawyers declined comment Wednesday.


EU should consider forming combined military force: defense chief

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

EU should consider forming combined military force: defense chief

  • Kubilius floated creating a “powerful, standing ‘European military force’ of 100,000 troops” that could eventually replace US forces
  • Trump has heightened fears among NATO allies over Washington’s reliability by insisting he wants to take over Greenland

BRUSSELS: EU countries should weigh whether to set up a combined military force that could eventually replace US troops in Europe, the bloc’s defense chief said Sunday.
EU defense commissioner Andrius Kubilius floated creating a “powerful, standing ‘European military force’ of 100,000 troops” as a possible option to better protect the continent.
“How will we replace the 100,000-strong American standing military force, which is the back-bone military force in Europe?” he asked in a speech in Sweden.
The suggestion comes as US President Donald Trump has heightened fears among NATO allies over Washington’s reliability by insisting he wants to take over Greenland.
Worries over Trump’s commitment to Europe have already spurred countries to step up efforts to bolster their militaries in the face of the threat posed by Russia.
Ideas about establishing a central European army have floated around for years but have largely failed to gain traction as nations are wary of relinquishing control over their militaries.
The US has pushed its European allies to increasingly take over responsibility for their own security, and raised the prospect it could shift forces from Europe to focus on China.
“In such times, we should not run away from the most pressing questions on our institutional defense readiness,” said Kubilius, a former Lithuanian prime minister.
In his speech Kubilius also advocated for the creation of a “European Security Council” of key powers — including potentially Britain — that could help the continent take decisions over its own defense quicker.
“The European Security Council could be composed of key permanent members, along with several rotational members,” he said.
“In total around 10-12 members, with the task to discuss the most important issues in defense.”
He said the first focus of such a body should be trying to change the dynamics in the war in Ukraine to ensure that Kyiv does not end up losing.
“We need to have a clear answer — how is the EU going to change that scenario?,” he said.
“This is the reason why we need to have a European Security Council now!“