SINGAPORE: Although the Saudi government gave the green light to an increased number of Singaporean pilgrims for Hajj, more and more younger Singaporeans are placing the pilgrimage on their bucket list.
Singapore is a multicultural nation nestled between Malaysia and Indonesia in the Malay Archipelago. About 14 percent of its 5.89 million population are Muslims, the majority being Malay-Muslims.
This year, the Singapore Pilgrims’ Affairs Office (SPAO) had its annual pre-departure briefing on July 7, whereby 900 pilgrims from Singapore will be performing Hajj.
The briefing was aimed to “prepare pilgrims to meet the challenges of the Hajj.”
The number is a jump from last year’s 850 pilgrims, with 90 percent of them first-time pilgrims.
From Hajj registrations to the appointment of Hajj travel agencies, the SPAO is the one-stop hub for Singapore’s Hajj affairs under the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (Muis), a government body that handles Muslim concerns in the country.
Traveling to Makkah for Hajj is one of the five pillars of Islam, but unlike the other pillars, it is only mandatory for those who can afford it. A typical Hajj package costs between $8,430 and $5,128.
As one of the most expensive cities in the world, Singapore has an average household income of S$6,600 per month, the highest in Southeast Asia. Most Muslims in Singapore enjoy the conveniences of a modern city.
Affandi Salleh, the chief operating officer of SSA Group, wrote a coffee table pictorial book to showcase the emotions of people who performed Hajj. He had performed Hajj twice, in 1983 and 2017.
“Ten to 20 percent of the pilgrims are younger than 40,” said Salleh, adding that going for Hajj has helped him “to have a spiritual balance in life.” Salleh wrote his book especially for those who have not performed Hajj yet or have no chance to go to Makkah and Madinah.
“In my opinion, yes, the young Singaporeans, even from 1983 till now, want to perform their Hajj. Starting from young does give you a sense of closeness to God. In my first trip in 1983, I was only 23 and unmarried,” he said.
Despite applying for Hajj, Hidayah Amin, an author and publisher of Helang Books, has yet to get called for Hajj because of the strict quota system where they give priority to the elderly first.
However, she has performed Umrah twice. “Once was with my parents during my late teens and the second time was in 2015 during Ramadan,” said Amin.
An increasing number of young Singaporeans go for Umrah because of the relatively low cost in comparison to Hajj. A person would only need to fork out $3,500 for a trip.
“It’s cheaper than Hajj and one does not need to be on the Hajj visa. Hence it’s easier to go,” said Amin.
Muslim Singaporeans in the civil service who are performing Hajj or Umrah can take a month’s unpaid leave.
Most Muslim Singaporeans have a higher purchasing power and spend more during Hajj. They also tend to stay in luxury hotels nearer the Grand Mosque.
“Singaporeans have higher spending power to perform Hajj. Most of these people save their money for these trips. It is not cheap compared to the neighboring countries,” said Salleh. He spent around $1,400 on souvenirs and gifts during his last Hajj trip.
“My package included a stay at the Hilton, which I consider luxurious,” said Amin. Most Umrah or Hajj packages take care of everything, including accommodation.
“I think most Singaporeans prefer hotels that are nearer the mosque. And these tend to be more expensive than those further away,” she added.
Meanwhile, Siraj Aziz, a writer, recently performed Umrah and sees going for Hajj as a “rite of passage.” He said going for pilgrimage is more and more appealing to the younger crowd, especially for exploration of self and religion.
“Not in the near future. Maybe in five to 10 years?” said Aziz regarding Hajj. He is a young man just starting a family. “I’m not that stable and secondly due to the quota system it may take a while.”
Despite bigger quota, more young Singaporeans are dreaming of Hajj
Despite bigger quota, more young Singaporeans are dreaming of Hajj
- The number is a jump from last year’s 850 pilgrims, with 90 percent of them first-time pilgrims
- A typical Hajj package costs between $8,430 and $5,128
Hong Kong firm begins arbitration proceedings over ruling against its Panama Canal port contract
- The Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997
- US Secretary of State Marco Rubio views the operation of the ports as a national security issue
HONG KONG: Hong Kong’s CK Hutchison Holdings said Wednesday its subsidiary started arbitration proceedings against Panama after that country’s Supreme Court ruled a concession for the subsidiary to operate Panama Canal ports was unconstitutional.
Hutchison said it strongly disagreed with last week’s ruling, and China warned Panama would pay “a heavy price” if it persisted. Panama’s president has moved to assure the public that the ports would operate without interruption after the ruling, which advanced a US aim to block any influence by China over the canal linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Hutchison’s subsidiary, Panama Ports Company, began arbitration proceedings Tuesday under the rules of the Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce, the company said in a statement.
The rules are overseen by the chamber’s International Court of Arbitration, an independent body, and it’s unclear what the impact of the proceedings would be. The Panamanian president’s office and commerce ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment late Tuesday local time.
The ruling draws ire from China
The court ruling has drawn backlash from China, and the tensions may complicate Hutchison’s plan to sell its port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes the US investment firm BlackRock Inc.
The planned sale has already been caught up in tensions between Beijing and Washington. US President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the canal, initially welcomed that plan. However, it apparently angered Beijing and drew a review by Chinese anti-monopoly authorities.
On Tuesday night, Beijing’s office overseeing Hong Kong affairs criticized the Panama court ruling as legally groundless and ridiculous, saying the ruling reflected that Panamanian authorities were bowing down to hegemonic powers. It did not specify the countries but pointed to politicians from some countries who had said they were “encouraged” by the ruling, in an apparent veiled reference to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
In a statement shared on social media platform WeChat, the office said that China will never bow to hegemonism and has sufficient means and tools, as well as capability, to uphold justice in the international economic and trade order.
“Panama’s authorities should recognize the situation and correct their course,” it said. “If they persist in their own way and refuse to see reason, they will pay a heavy price both politically and economically!”
A company caught in US-China tensions
The Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. The awkward position Hutchison found itself in highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing’s expectations of national loyalty, especially during U.S-China tension. CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing.
The company said last July that it was considering seeking a Chinese investor to join as a significant member of the consortium under its sale plan, a move that some interpreted as way to please Beijing, but CK Hutchison hasn’t said more since.
The consortium also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, which is chaired by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li’s.
Last May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor.
Panama’s government has maintained it has full control over the canal and that the operation of the ports by Hutchison does not mean Chinese control of it. But Rubio made clear that the US viewed the operation of the ports as a national security issue.
Hutchison said it strongly disagreed with last week’s ruling, and China warned Panama would pay “a heavy price” if it persisted. Panama’s president has moved to assure the public that the ports would operate without interruption after the ruling, which advanced a US aim to block any influence by China over the canal linking the Atlantic and Pacific oceans.
Hutchison’s subsidiary, Panama Ports Company, began arbitration proceedings Tuesday under the rules of the Paris-based International Chamber of Commerce, the company said in a statement.
The rules are overseen by the chamber’s International Court of Arbitration, an independent body, and it’s unclear what the impact of the proceedings would be. The Panamanian president’s office and commerce ministry did not immediately respond to requests for comment late Tuesday local time.
The ruling draws ire from China
The court ruling has drawn backlash from China, and the tensions may complicate Hutchison’s plan to sell its port assets in dozens of countries to a group that includes the US investment firm BlackRock Inc.
The planned sale has already been caught up in tensions between Beijing and Washington. US President Donald Trump, who has alleged that China interferes with the canal, initially welcomed that plan. However, it apparently angered Beijing and drew a review by Chinese anti-monopoly authorities.
On Tuesday night, Beijing’s office overseeing Hong Kong affairs criticized the Panama court ruling as legally groundless and ridiculous, saying the ruling reflected that Panamanian authorities were bowing down to hegemonic powers. It did not specify the countries but pointed to politicians from some countries who had said they were “encouraged” by the ruling, in an apparent veiled reference to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio.
In a statement shared on social media platform WeChat, the office said that China will never bow to hegemonism and has sufficient means and tools, as well as capability, to uphold justice in the international economic and trade order.
“Panama’s authorities should recognize the situation and correct their course,” it said. “If they persist in their own way and refuse to see reason, they will pay a heavy price both politically and economically!”
A company caught in US-China tensions
The Hutchison subsidiary has operated ports at both ends of the Panama Canal since 1997. The awkward position Hutchison found itself in highlights the challenges Hong Kong business elites face in navigating Beijing’s expectations of national loyalty, especially during U.S-China tension. CK Hutchison is owned by the family of Hong Kong’s richest man, Li Ka-shing.
The company said last July that it was considering seeking a Chinese investor to join as a significant member of the consortium under its sale plan, a move that some interpreted as way to please Beijing, but CK Hutchison hasn’t said more since.
The consortium also includes BlackRock subsidiary Global Infrastructure Partners and Terminal Investment Limited, which is chaired by Italian shipping scion Diego Aponte, whose family reportedly has a longstanding relationship with Li’s.
Last May, Hutchinson co-managing director, Dominic Lai told shareholders that Terminal Investment was the main investor.
Panama’s government has maintained it has full control over the canal and that the operation of the ports by Hutchison does not mean Chinese control of it. But Rubio made clear that the US viewed the operation of the ports as a national security issue.
© 2026 SAUDI RESEARCH & PUBLISHING COMPANY, All Rights Reserved And subject to Terms of Use Agreement.









