Court sentences Pakistan’s former PM Nawaz Sharif to 10 years’ jail on corruption charges

Nawaz Sharif, right, former Prime Minister and leader of Pakistan Muslim League, gestures to supporters as his daughter Maryam Nawaz looks on during party’s workers convention in Islamabad, Pakistan June 4, 2018. (FAISAL MAHMOOD/REUTERS/FILE)
Updated 06 July 2018
Follow

Court sentences Pakistan’s former PM Nawaz Sharif to 10 years’ jail on corruption charges

  • Sharif sentenced to 10 years’ jail for having assets beyond declared income and one year over non-cooperation with anti-corruption watchdog.
  • Maryam Nawaz sentenced to seven years’ imprisonment over abetting and one year over falsifying documents.

ISLAMABAD: An accountability court on Friday issued a 176-page verdict against the disqualified premier, Nawaz Sharif, and his family over corruption claims linked to the 2015 Panama papers, forcing his political party to rethink its election strategy after a series of legal and political setbacks.

The court verdict enraged Sharif’s die-hard supporters.

Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) rejected the verdict, and Sharif’s younger brother, Shahbaz, pledged to challenge the order.

“Nawaz Sharif has been sentenced to 10 years’ imprisonment (on ownership of assets beyond income) and fined £8 million ($10 million). Maryam Nawaz is sentenced to seven years over abetting, forgery and fake trust deed document and fined £2 million. (Ret.) Capt. Safdar Awan, husband of Maryam, has been sentenced one year’s imprisonment (over non-cooperation with NAB),” said the National Accountability Bureau (NAB) prosecutor, Sardar Muzaffar, outside the court.

He said that the Avenfield properties would be confiscated by the federation.

The ruling by the trial court judge, Muhammed Bashir, came several hours after the stipulated announcement time. The sentencing also disqualified Nawaz and Safdar for life. The authorities are also expected to seize their assets and freeze their bank accounts.

“We have faith in God and are not worried,” tweeted Maryam Nawaz. She called on the nation to stand with her father who had faced similar situations in the past and remained steadfast.

Meanwhile, Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), which spearheaded a campaign against Nawaz Sharif following the Panama leaks, praised the verdict.

“We were the first petitioners in the Panama case. Imran Khan was adamant to pursue the case for which he held rallies and protests. Nawaz Sharif’s sentencing is credited to Khan. This is a landmark decision. Pakistan’s future will be better now,” PTI’s Ali Awan told Arab News.

However, political analyst Qamar Cheema said that those thinking of capitalizing on the verdict should not underestimate thepopularity of the former ruling party among the masses.

“PML-N will not perish politically as it has a strong base in northern Punjab. Even with institutional pressure and this verdict, the party is maintaining its position,” he said.

The Sharifs were accused of embezzling public funds to offshore accounts that were used to purchase four high valued Avenfield properties, an apartment block on Park Lane in central London. The graft case also implicated Sharif’s sons, Hassan and Hussain.

The court dismissed applications by lawyers of the defendants on Thursday seeking a seven-day delay in announcing the verdict. Sharif and his co-accused daughter, Maryam Nawaz, both of whom are in London since June monitoring the health of Sharif’s wife, Kulsoom Nawaz, who is being treated for throat cancer, pleaded their inability to appear before the court. However, Sharif’s son-in-law Awan also failed to appear to hear the verdict.

In compliance to the Supreme Court order of July 28, 2017, which ousted the three-time prime minister, declaring him “dishonest” under Article 62 (1) (f) of Pakistan’s constitution, three corruption references were filed by Pakistan’s National Accountability Court (NAB) in September against the Sharifs and a fourth against their relative, ex-finance minister Ishaq Dar.

In October, the accountability court had indicted the disqualified politician, his daughter, and her husband, Awan. Dar was also indicted, but he fled to London citing health issues and medical reasons. Sharif’s two sons, who are British citizens, also ignored the repeated court summons. The three were subsequently declared absconders. Their trial is expected to be held separately in which the two brothers are declared proclaimed offenders in the three graft references.

The exhaustive accountability court trial has held 107 hearings in a span of nine months, most of which Sharif, Nawaz, and Awan attended. A Joint Investigation Team, constituted by a three-member Apex court bench to probe and prosecute the accused, produced 18 witnesses who were cross-examined by the defense counsel.

Sharif was forced to relinquish his leadership position from his party, ending his active involvement in its political affairs.

Court hearings continue pending a decision on the other two corruption references against the Sharifs, but they do not include Nawaz and Awan.

Former law ministry adviser and legal expert Sharaft Ali, who was present at the accountability court, told Arab News that the prosecution would try to prolong the decision in the remaining two references so that the court would not hand down concurrent punishment.

Although the defendants will be arrested immediately, “they can file an appeal within 10 days to suspend the trial court’s order” in the high court, said Ali.

 


Bill Clinton says he ‘did nothing wrong’ with Epstein as he faces grilling over their relationship

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Bill Clinton says he ‘did nothing wrong’ with Epstein as he faces grilling over their relationship

  • “I saw nothing, and I did nothing wrong,” the former Democratic president said
  • The closed-door deposition in Chappaqua, New York, marks the first time a former president has been compelled to testify to Congress

WASHINGTON: Former President Bill Clinton told members of Congress on Friday that he “did nothing wrong” in his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and saw no signs of Epstein’s sexual abuse as he faced hours of grilling from lawmakers over his connections to the disgraced financier from more than two decades ago.
“I saw nothing, and I did nothing wrong,” the former Democratic president said in an opening statement he shared on social media at the outset of the deposition.
The closed-door deposition in Chappaqua, New York, marks the first time a former president has been compelled to testify to Congress. It came a day after Clinton’s wife, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, sat with lawmakers for her own deposition.
Bill Clinton has also not been accused of any wrongdoing. Yet lawmakers are grappling with what accountability in the United States looks like at a time when men around the world have been toppled from their high-powered posts for maintaining their connections with Epstein after he pleaded guilty in 2008 to state charges in Florida for soliciting prostitution from an underage girl.
“Men — and women for that matter — of great power and great wealth from all across the world have been able to get away with a lot of heinous crimes and they haven’t been held accountable and they have not even had to answer questions,” said Republican Rep. James Comer, the chair of the House Oversight Committee, before the deposition began Friday.
Hillary Clinton told lawmakers Thursday that she had no knowledge of how Epstein had sexually abused underage girls and had no recollection of even meeting him. But Bill Clinton will have to answer questions on a well-documented relationship with Epstein and his former girlfriend Ghislaine Maxwell, even if it was from the late 1990s and early 2000s.
Bill Clinton in his opening statement said that he would likely often tell the committee that he did not recall the specifics of events from more than 20 years ago. But he also expressed certainty that he had not witnessed signs of Epstein’s abuse.
During a break after two hours of questioning, Democratic lawmakers said that Bill Clinton had tried to answer every question and had not invoked his Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
Still, Republicans were relishing the opportunity to scrutinize the former Democratic president under oath.
“No one’s accusing anyone of any wrongdoing, but I think the American people have a lot of questions,” Comer said.
Republicans finally get a chance to question Bill Clinton
Republicans have wanted to question Bill Clinton about Epstein for years, especially as conspiracy theories arose following Epstein’s 2019 suicide in a New York jail cell while he faced sex trafficking charges.
Those calls reached a fever pitch late last year when several photos of the former president surfaced in the Department of Justice’s first release of case files on Epstein and Maxwell, a British socialite who was convicted of sex trafficking in December 2021 but maintains she’s innocent. Bill Clinton was photographed on a plane seated alongside a woman, whose face is redacted, with his arm around her. Another photo showed Clinton and Maxwell in a pool with another person whose face was redacted.
Epstein also visited the White House several times during Clinton’s presidency, and the pair later made several international trips together for their humanitarian work. Comer claimed the committee has collected evidence that Epstein visited the White House 17 times and that Bill Clinton flew on Epstein’s airplane 27 times.
Democratic lawmakers said they also posed tough questions to Bill Clinton about his relationship with Epstein and Maxwell.
“We are only here because he hid it from everyone so well for so long,” Bill Clinton said in his opening statement. “And by the time it came to light with his 2008 guilty plea, I had long stopped associating with him.”
Comer pledged extensive questioning of the former president. He claimed that Hillary Clinton had repeatedly deferred questions about Epstein to her husband.
Bill Clinton went after Comer for calling his wife before the committee, telling him that “including her was simply not right.”
The committee was working to quickly publish a transcript and video recording of her deposition.
Has a precedent been set?
Democrats, who have supported the push to get answers from Bill Clinton, are arguing that it sets a precedent that should also apply to President Donald Trump, a Republican who had his own relationship with Epstein.
“I think that President Trump needs to man up, get in front of this committee and answer the questions and stop calling this investigation a hoax,” said Rep. Robert Garcia, the top Democrat on the committee, on Friday.
Comer has pushed back on that idea, saying that Trump has answered questions on Epstein from the press.
Trump on Friday expressed remorse at Bill Clinton being forced to testify. “I like Bill Clinton, and I don’t like seeing him deposed,” he told reporters as he departed the White House en route to Corpus Christi, Texas.
Democrats are also calling for the resignation of Trump’s Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick. Lutnick was a longtime neighbor of Epstein in New York City but said on a podcast that he severed ties with Epstein following a 2005 tour of Epstein’s home that disturbed Lutnick and his wife.
The public release of case files showed that Lutnick actually had two engagements with Epstein years later. He attended a 2011 event at Epstein’s home, and in 2012 his family had lunch with Epstein on his private island.
“He should be removed from office and at a minimum should come before the committee,” Garcia said of Lutnick.
Republican Rep. Nancy Mace questioned Hillary Clinton about Lutnick’s relationship to Epstein during the deposition on Thursday. On Friday morning, Mace joined in calling for the commerce secretary to come before the committee.
“I believe we will have the votes to subpoena him,” Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna said.