Frustrated Afghans in a long march for peace

1 / 4
The “convoy of peace” was conceived in March by villagers in the southern Helmand province. (Photo courtesy: Iqbal Khaibar, an organizer of the march)
2 / 4
The “convoy of peace” was conceived in March by villagers in the southern Helmand province. (Photo courtesy: Iqbal Khaibar, an organizer of the march)
3 / 4
The “convoy of peace” was conceived in March by villagers in the southern Helmand province. (Photo courtesy: Iqbal Khaibar, an organizer of the march)
4 / 4
The “convoy of peace” was conceived in March by villagers in the southern Helmand province. (Photo courtesy: Iqbal Khaibar, an organizer of the march)
Updated 10 June 2018
Follow

Frustrated Afghans in a long march for peace

  • For weeks, a growing group has walked from Helmand to neighboring provinces to mobilize public pressure on the government and the Taliban to end the war. 
  • The group plans to march to Kabul to pass on a proposal to the government, the UN and the US-led coalition. Most of the marchers have lost at least one family member to the war.   

KABUL: Under blistering sun, a group of fasting Afghans has been marching for peace for nearly a month, mobilizing people in villages and towns.

The “Convoy of Peace” was conceived in March by villagers in southern Helmand province, after more than a dozen people were killed when an explosives-laden vehicle went off during a wrestling match as part of Afghan new-year celebrations.

The villagers walked for nearly 200 km to talk with government commanders and Taliban members to agree to a truce.

When their message fell on deaf ears, they set up a sit-in tent, then began a nationwide march at the start of Ramadan. 

Braving the heat and attacks, the group has marched from Helmand to the adjacent provinces of Kandahar, Zabul and Ghazni.

The route is part of a Taliban stronghold, and witnesses routine clashes between it and US-backed Afghan forces.

The marchers “have been welcomed by villagers who give them food, shelter and medical care,” Roozi Mohammad Zabuli, a coordinator of civil society groups in Zabul, told Arab News.

“They’re telling the people that peace is in the hands of ordinary people, and that they can achieve it by putting pressure on the warring sides. People are exhausted here and thirsty for peace, and have hailed the initiative.” 

The march began with seven people but now includes 50. One is a sports champion, another has a master’s degree, and two are physically disabled.

Sardar Mohammad re-joined the march after leaving to attend the funeral of his brother, who was killed in an attack in Kandahar. Most of the marchers have lost at least one family member to the war.

Hamidullah Tokhi, a lawmaker from Zabul, said the group prefers to avoid engaging with local authorities because it does not want to be seen to be favoring one side.

“It’s a big initiative. People are happy. You’ll see a gradual but concrete impact on the minds of people that they have to take charge of their own destiny rather than wait for others to bring them peace,” he told Arab News.

“We can call it the start of a revolution. Revolutions always begin with a small number of people and ambitious goals. They have the determination and will to work for peace.”

Government officials and the Taliban endorse the march, saying they will support any move than can bring security to Afghanistan.

The marchers plan to head to Kabul to pass on a proposal to the government, the UN and the US-led coalition for a cease-fire, the establishment of an Islamic government that includes the Taliban, and a timetable for the withdrawal of foreign forces.

“If the two sides don’t accept our demands, we’ll go to other provinces and tell people to join us and mount pressure on who’s at fault,” Iqbal Khaibar, an organizer of the march, told Arab News.

In Kabul, “we’ll be telling the international community humbly: ‘We’re human just like you. All our mothers are mourning here every day. Do your mothers and your blood differ from ours? Let us have peace’,” he added.

Zabuli said: “When there’s national pressure, foreign troops will pull out. We just need to give people the mentality that they have to stand and take charge of their lives and stop the war.”

Khaibar said: “The Taliban says foreign troops should leave then it’ll talk with the government, while foreign troops say there should be peace then they’ll leave. We have to find a solution to this, and that’s exactly what the marchers are after.”


UK pays Guantanamo detainee ‘substantial’ compensation over US torture questions

Updated 12 January 2026
Follow

UK pays Guantanamo detainee ‘substantial’ compensation over US torture questions

  • Abu Zubaydah has been held at Guantanamo Bay without charge for 20 years
  • British security services knew he was subjected to ‘enhanced interrogation’ but failed to raise concerns for 4 years

LONDON: A Saudi-born Palestinian being held without trial by the US has received a “substantial” compensation payment from the UK government, the BBC reported.

Abu Zubaydah has been imprisoned at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba for almost 20 years following his capture in Pakistan in 2002, and was subjected to “enhanced interrogation” techniques by the CIA.

He was accused of being a senior member of Al-Qaeda in the aftermath of the Sept. 11 terror attacks on the US. The allegations were later dropped but he remains in detention.

The compensation follows revelations that UK security services submitted questions to the US to be put to Abu Zubaydah by their US counterparts despite knowledge of his mistreatment.

He alleged that MI5 and MI6 had been “complicit” in torture, leading to a legal case and the subsequent compensation.

Dominic Grieve, the UK’s former attorney general, chaired a panel reviewing Abu Zubaydah’s case.

He described the compensation as “very unusual” but said the treatment of Abu Zubaydah had been “plainly” wrong, the BBC reported.

Grieve added that the security services had evidence that the “Americans were behaving in a way that should have given us cause for real concern,” and that “we (UK authorities) should have raised it with the US and, if necessary, closed down co-operation, but we failed to do that for a considerable period of time.”

Abu Zubaydah’s international legal counsel, Prof. Helen Duffy, said: “The compensation is important, it’s significant, but it’s insufficient.”

She added that more needs to be done to secure his release, stating: “These violations of his rights are not historic, they are ongoing.”

Duffy said Abu Zubaydah would continue to fight for his freedom, adding: “I am hopeful that the payment of the substantial sums will enable him to do that and to support himself when he’s in the outside world.”

He is one of 15 people still being held at Guantanamo, many without charge. Following his initial detention, he arrived at the prison camp having been the first person to be taken to a so-called CIA “black site.”

He spent time at six such locations, including in Lithuania and Poland, outside of US legal jurisdiction. 

Internal MI6 messages revealed that the “enhanced interrogation” techniques he was subjected to would have “broken” the resolve of an estimated 98 percent of US special forces members had they been subjected to them.

CIA officers later decided he would be permanently cut off from the outside world, with then-President George W. Bush publicly saying Abu Zubaydah had been “plotting and planning murder.”

However, the US has since withdrawn the allegations and no longer says he was a member of Al-Qaeda.

A report by the US Senate Select Committee on Intelligence said Abu Zubaydah had been waterboarded at least 83 times, was locked in a coffin-like box for extended periods, and had been regularly assaulted. Much of his treatment would be considered torture under UK law.

Despite knowledge of his treatment, it was four years before British security services raised concerns with their American counterparts, and their submission of questions within that period had “created a market” for the torture of detainees, Duffy said.

A 2018 report by the UK Parliament’s Intelligence and Security Committee was deeply critical of the behavior of MI5 and MI6 in relation to Abu Zubaydah. 

It also criticized conduct relating to Guantanamo detainee Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, widely regarded as a key architect of the Sept. 11 attacks, warning that the precedent set by Abu Zubaydah’s legal action could be used by Mohammed to bring a separate case against the UK.

MI5 and MI6 failed to comment on Abu Zubaydah’s case. Neither the UK government nor Mohammed’s legal team would comment on a possible case over his treatment.