LONDON: Across the world, millions of listeners are eagerly awaiting their next fix of “Caliphate,” the debut narrative documentary podcast from The New York Times.
The paper’s mini-series follows the story of a Canadian Daesh returnee — dubbed Abu Huzaifa Al-Kanadi — and is The New York Times’ first foray into a new style of journalism.
“Caliphate” follows in the footsteps of smash series such as “Serial” and “S-Town,” investigative journalism spinoffs from the hugely influential “This American Life” podcast.
“Serial,” launched in 2014, has been downloaded more than 250 million times, while S-Town, which debuted last year, was downloaded more than 10 million times in the first four days of its release — setting a new record in the podcasting world.
In “Caliphate,” which debuted in April, New York Times investigative journalist Rukmini Callimachi (right) asks of the war of terror, “Who is it that we’re really fighting?” The result is a gripping foray into the world of Daesh recruitment, butchery, and murder.
Despite the show’s gory public appeal, the podcast’s success has provoked a backlash in Canada.
While he was reportedly questioned by the Canadian Security and Intelligence Services, Abu Huzaifa has not been charged with any crimes.
There were angry questions in the Canadian House of Commons last month, when Conservative House leader Candice Bergen asked the Trudeau government why Abu Huzaifa is freely being allowed to live in Canada.
“This guy is apparently in Toronto. Canadians deserve more answers from this government,” Bergen said. “Why aren’t they doing something about this despicable animal that’s walking around the country? This individual is speaking freely to the media.”
This rise in the popularity of shows such as “Caliphate” and “Serial” has highlighted an overlap between the practices of investigative journalism, law enforcement and public policy. Experts also warn of blurring the line between narrative fiction and reality, and of drawing the wrong kind of attention to historical crimes.
Scott Lucas, professor of politics at the University of Birmingham, said he has a “double-edged view” of podcasts such as “Caliphate.”
“I can admire this type of journalism, particularly when it brings new light and gets a retrial for the convicted or gets the case squashed. This can be a mark of great journalism,” Lucas told Arab News.
However, the professor said podcasts must be careful not to elevate crimes for the sake of entertainment.
“When you sensationalize it, you run into problems. ‘Caliphate’ doesn’t do that but it’s something that they need to be aware of.”
Lucas added that journalists have a duty “to tell the full story” and not lose sight of the wider causes of the phenomenon that is Daesh.
“(‘Caliphate’) mentions the beheading of (US journalist) James Foley with only a quick reference … sometimes when we stare at Daesh like this, the context is lost. The NYT should take the story as wide as possible,” he said.
Despite Callimachi potentially uncovering vital Daesh intelligence, Lucas insisted “a journalist must just carry out a journalist’s job, which is only to find information.” He explained: “A journalist is not there to carry out the provision of law enforcement. It’s up to the law enforcers to investigate criminals.
“While ‘Caliphate’ is talking about a phenomenon that is confusing and unsettling, in my opinion that line is still clear-cut between law enforcement and journalism.”
In one podcast, Abu Huzaifa confessed murder to Callimachi but later rescinded his confession when questioned by local news station CBC.
This raises questions about the witness’ veracity, said Lucas.
“Is (Callimachi) even being told a truthful story? She may have similar analysis skills with law enforcers, but it’s not her job to see whether she has enough evidence for court,” he said.
In an article published in the NYT earlier this year, Callimachi detailed how she scoured abandoned Daesh “government” posts for documents and souvenirs. Much of her team’s haul contained enlightening and granular evidence of the brutal regime’s crimes and day-to-day activities.
But did she hand any of the hastily retrieved documents — often snatched in the fresh aftermath of a Daesh stronghold takeover — to Iraqi security forces? “Of course not!” Callimachi told Arab News via Twitter.
In Lucas’ opinion, “Those ISIS documents are investigated as a journalist and not as a criminal investigator. (Security services) will contact journalists in certain cases.”
Charlie Beckett, director of the Truth, Trust and Technology Commission at the London School of Economics, said that he doesn’t see a real difference between a podcast and any other form of journalism when it comes to ethics.
“If you can justify a public interest then you have a good reason to publish evidence,” Beckett told Arab News. “As long as it does not compromise the workings of the judicial system or prevent due and fair process then this is exactly what journalism should do. How media outlets manage it must depend partly on local laws and norms, but also on the policy of that newsroom.”
New York Times podcast ‘Caliphate’ faces backlash over ethics
New York Times podcast ‘Caliphate’ faces backlash over ethics
- The paper’s mini-series follows the story of a Canadian Daesh returnee — dubbed Abu Huzaifa Al-Kanadi — and is The New York Times’ first foray into a new style of journalism.
- “Caliphate” follows in the footsteps of smash series such as “Serial” and “S-Town,” investigative journalism spinoffs from the hugely influential “This American Life” podcast.
AI fuels cyber threats but also offers new defenses, panel tells WEF
- Cyber threats surged in 2025, with Distributed Denial of Service attack records shattered 25 times and a staggering 1,400% rise in incidents involving AI-powered bots incarcerating humans
- Experts agreed that while AI has accelerated new and sophisticated threats, with phishing and impersonation on the rise, it has also improved solutions
DUBAI: Artificial intelligence is making cyberattacks more sophisticated and widespread, but it is also enhancing digital defenses, experts told the World Economic Forum on Wednesday, as they stressed the need for zero-trust systems and robust AI frameworks to reduce vulnerabilities.
Cyber threats surged in 2025, with Distributed Denial of Service attack records shattered 25 times and a staggering 1,400 percent rise in incidents involving AI-powered bots incarcerating humans.
Experts agreed that while AI has accelerated new and sophisticated threats, with phishing and impersonation on the rise, it has also improved solutions.
Michelle Zatlyn, co-founder, president and COO of Cloudflare, pointed to modern solutions organizations can invest in. However, she warned against the digital divide between major financial institutions that have robust cybersecurity measures, and smaller organizations struggling with outdated security solutions.
This divide, she said, necessitates heightened awareness and adaptation to modern security technologies to prevent crises, especially during vulnerable times like weekends.
The panelists stressed international collaboration and intelligence sharing between government agencies, law enforcement and the private sector as the way to tackle cross-border threats and build more resilient societies.
Catherine de Bolle, executive director at Europol, said AI has transformed the policing scene where traditional methods no longer function. She emphasized Europol’s extensive efforts to boost collaboration with the private sector to develop tools to protect the digital ecosystem, enhance crypto tracing and boost financial security.
De Bolle said AI had enhanced the capabilities and outreach of organized crime groups “because it facilitates the business model where you only need a computer and some people who are technically schooled.”
“We predict that in the future, digital crime frauds will be much easier as you gain a lot of money and reach more people without the need of an infrastructure,” she added. Collaboration with the private sector, she said, helps ensure a secure ecosystem that maintains user trust in online platforms.
However, Michael Miebach, CEO of Mastercard, said while AI can help defend against cyberattacks, trust needs to be built first among people to make these technologies fulfill its promises in driving prosperity and growth.
“If we don’t build a trusted layer around these technologies, people will not use it,” he said, pointing out that cyber threats have impacted the geopolitical, societal and corporate aspects of life.
Hatem Dowidar, group CEO of e&, called for more intelligent networks to deploy AI agents that detect and isolate malicious behavior early on to protect digital ecosystems from highly disruptive cyberattacks.
“So you are in some sense more cognizant of malicious hardware being embedded in your system,” he said. However, he warned against the loophole created as more companies implement agentic AI agents that could expose networks. Therefore, he urged the building of zero-trust systems to prevent incursions of new threats coming through these technologies.
He also stressed the need to establish guardrails to monitor AI agents because they are “programmed in plain language and it’s very easy that the programming goes out of context.”
“We never could have relied 100 percent on a human agent to work if there is no supervision and that will hold true for AI,” said Dowidar.
Another challenge the panelists highlighted was the blurred lines between state and non-state actors, with states potentially using organized crime to execute cyber operations.
Europol’s de Bolle said this brings new challenges for traditional policing and necessitates joint efforts across intelligence, defense, and law enforcement sectors.
“State actors are using criminal groups for their own purposes to launch DDoS attacks,” she said, adding that the danger comes from the fact that “states can hide behind and criminals can hide after the state and they don’t have to make the investment because the structure is already there.”
She said such developments make it necessary to think of the future of defense police intelligence services where law enforcement works closely with the private sector to tackle such dangers, while respecting the boundaries of different agencies: “If we do not put the information and intelligence together to tackle this, we will never win the battle.”
Dowidar said information sharing needed to happen on national and international security levels. Nationally, there should be an entity that coordinates between the police, intelligence, network operators and the critical infrastructure companies.
Internationally, there should be security centers that immediately inform other like-minded organizations around the world of any new threat, along with sharing how the problem was solved or whether help is needed from other experts.
Meanwhile, de Bolle said it was the responsibility of the private and public sectors to build societal resilience, boost digital literacy, revamp the education system and develop the critical mindset of the young generation who will use these tools in the future.
Cloudflare’s Zatlyn urged business leaders to understand the basics of new technologies, beyond only relying on technical teams, to keep revenue flowing and minimize risks facing their networks.
She also stressed that CEOs and organizations must consider AI agents as an “extension” of their teams.
“Organizations are concerned that their data will leak with the use of new technologies, but this depends how to train the agents. These are all stoppable issues,” said Zatlyn.
