Rohingyas top of agenda at OIC foreign ministers’ council in Dhaka

Bangladesh Pemier Sheikh Hasina has urged the Muslim world to have a stronger voice in safeguarding Rohingyas’ rights. (AFP)
Updated 05 May 2018
Follow

Rohingyas top of agenda at OIC foreign ministers’ council in Dhaka

  • Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajed, in her inaugural speech, urged the Muslim world to have a stronger voice in safeguarding the rights of the Rohingyas
  • While visiting Rohingya refugees on Friday, the OIC's Council of Foreign Ministers said the organization would strengthen its voice in the UN to put more pressure on Myanmar.

DHAKA, Bangladesh: The 45th Council of Foreign Ministers (CFM) of OIC (Organization of the Islamic Cooperation) began in Dhaka on Saturday with a focus on the Rohingya refugee crisis.

In the inaugural speech, Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina Wajed urged the Muslim world to have a stronger voice in safeguarding the rights of the Rohingyas. 

“When the Rohingya community of Myanmar is being subjected to ‘ethnic cleansing’ the OIC fraternity cannot overlook it,” Hasina said. 

She urged OIC members to “stand solidly” beside the forcibly deported Rohingyas to protect their rights.

 

Right to life

Appealing to OIC leaders to put more international pressure on Myanmar to repatriate the refugees, Hasina said: “Rohingyas deserve the right to life, dignity and existence like us.”

Foreign ministers, state ministers and representatives from the 57 OIC member countries are participating in the two-day council to enhance “Islamic values for sustainable peace, solidarity and development,” the theme of this year’s council.

OIC Secretary-General Dr. Yousef A. Al-Othaimeen, Ivory Coast Foreign Minister Marcel Amon-Tanoh and Turkey Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Ahmet Yildiz and Bangladesh Foreign Minister A.H. Mahmud Ali also delivered speeches.

Ali emphasized the need for reformation of the OIC as there were many non-OIC countries where a large number of Muslims were living. 

“There is a need to build bridges with those non-OIC countries, so that a large number of Muslim populations do not remain untouched by the good work of OIC. That is why we need OIC reforms and restructuring,” Ali said. 

To address the Rohingya crisis, the CFM delegation on Friday, while visiting Rohingya refugees, said that the OIC would strengthen its voice in the UN to put more pressure on Myanmar.

Shomser Mobin Chowdhury, former Bangladesh foreign secretary and ambassador, said: “It is very significant that now the OIC is promising to raise a strong voice against Myanmar. Saudi Arabia, Malaysia, Indonesia, Pakistan, Bangladesh; all these countries when they raise their voices together will create a good impact.”

Shomsher says that as Myanmar is not an OIC member state, OIC countries needed to find a way to put Myanmar under pressure to resolve the Rohigya crisis. “Two important ASEAN members, Indonesia and Malaysia, can play a vital role in this regard because Myanmar is also an ASEAN state.”

“These two important major countries can accelerate the issue in the regional forum of ASEAN,” Shomsher said. 

On the first day the heads of delegations made their statements in the first working session while a parallel meeting of the OIC special committee held another session discussing Palestinian issues and the challenges of the Muslim Ummah.

The delegates also engaged in a special session on the humanitarian challenges facing OIC countries.

This is the second time Dhaka has hosted the CFM since 1983. During the inaugural session the OIC secretary general presented a Gilaf of Holy Kaaba to the Bangladeshi prime minister.


Trump cuts India tariffs as Modi ‘agrees’ to stop buying Russian oil

Updated 52 min 7 sec ago
Follow

Trump cuts India tariffs as Modi ‘agrees’ to stop buying Russian oil

  • US will impose an 18 percent tariff on Indian goods, down from the earlier 50 percent punitive levy
  • Withdrawal from Russian oil may affect India’s relations with BRICS, expert says

NEW DELHI: The US and India have announced reaching a trade agreement after months of friction, with President Donald Trump saying that Prime Minister Narendra Modi had “agreed” to halt purchases of Russian oil.

In August, Trump accused India, which imports most of its crude oil, of funding Moscow’s war in Ukraine and subjected it to a combined tariff rate of about 50 percent on most of the exports.

Following a call with Modi on Monday, Trump took to social media to say that he would cut with immediate effect US levies on Indian goods to 18 percent after Modi “agreed to stop buying Russian Oil, and to buy much more from the United States and, potentially, Venezuela.”

At the same time, India, Trump wrote, would “reduce their Tariffs and Non Tariff Barriers against the United States, to ZERO,” committing to buy “over $500 BILLION DOLLARS of US Energy, Technology, Agricultural, Coal, and many other products.”

Modi confirmed the agreement on social media, saying: “Made in India products will now have a reduced tariff of 18 percent,” without commenting on Russian oil or duty-free imports of American goods.

When the US announced its punitive tariffs last year, India quickly moved forward with free trade negotiations with other countries — signing a deal with Oman and finalizing negotiations with New Zealand and the EU.

While the agreements were expected to partially offset the loss of exports to the US, economists did not expect they would immediately mitigate it, as shifting supply chains takes time.

The newly announced agreement with the US will therefore offer short-term relief for Indian exporters — especially of textiles, gems, jewelry and marine products — who were facing the threat of a market exit.

“In that case, the trade deal with the US is a welcome step. It provides short-term relief, allowing India to continue exporting to the US without being forced to exit the US market and diversify with a huge transition cost,” said Anisree Suresh, geoeconomics researcher at the Takshashila Institution.

“However, one shouldn’t look at it as a comprehensive long-term trade deal like the one India signed with the EU. The unpredictability of the Trump administration remains a major concern, regardless of whether there is a trade deal with the US ... India cannot treat this deal the same as other FTAs, as it is limited in scope and subject to reversal.”

When the US imposed its punitive tariffs on India, about 66 percent of total Indian exports were subject to that rate. Overall, India recorded a negative margin of 19.5 percent, meaning its exports were taxed more heavily than those of its competitors.

“From that point of view, Indian goods will have a larger market over there. However, there’s a problem when we talk about a 0 percent tariff on the US,” said Prof. Arun Kumar, a development economist.

“The US will be able to export a lot more to India, and therefore it will affect our production within the economy. And that will be a setback, so while exports may rise, the internal economy may actually suffer because of this decrease in tariffs on American goods. And especially if it affects agriculture.”

The sudden withdrawal from India’s partnership with Russia may not have a serious economic impact but politically could affect New Delhi’s relations, also with other countries, especially those from BRICS — a grouping that besides India and Russia includes also Brazil and China, and is the most powerful geopolitical forum outside of the Western world.

“You can always substitute Russian oil with some other oil, but I think it’s more of a strategic question, because India and Russia have had long-standing relationships, and if we bend to US pressure and reduce purchases from Russia, then it will affect in future also our relationship with Russia, because we will not be seen as a stable ally,” Kumar said.

“BRICS nations will not trust India very much in the future ... and that’s what Trump wants. He wants to disrupt BRICS. That’s what he has been doing right since the beginning to divide nations and deal with them individually.”