Saudi Arabia PMI edges lower in April but employment ticks up

Saudi Arabia’s Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) edged lower last month as new orders contracted. (AN Photo)
Updated 03 May 2018
Follow

Saudi Arabia PMI edges lower in April but employment ticks up

RIYADH: Saudi Arabia’s Purchasing Managers’ Index (PMI) edged lower last month as new orders contracted.
Saudi PMI fell to 51.4 in April from 52.8 in March, which represents the lowest reading since the series began in August 2009.
The PMI report from the UAE’s largest bank, Emirates NBD (ENBD), showed that the Kingdom’s new orders weakened in April.
According to ENBD, firms blamed “subdued market demand, competitive pressures and unpredictable economic conditions” for the decline.
Still, employment increased ‘modestly’ in April, despite the weakness in new orders.
Despite the overall weakness of April’s survey, future expectations remained high, with around 43 percent of firms expecting their output to be higher in a year’s time.
“The average PMI for Saudi Arabia year-to-date is 52.6. This is well below the average for 2017 of 56.1, and also much lower than the long-run series average of 57.9,” said Khatija Haque, head of MENA research at Emirates NBD.
“That non-oil private sector activity has slowed so sharply this year is surprising to us, particularly when we consider the expansionary budget that was announced for 2018 to support growth in the non-oil sectors and the unexpectedly high oil price year-to-date, which usually drives stronger non-oil sector activity,” Haque added.
ENBD said the “softer than expected” PMI data year-to-date raises the downside risks to its 2.5 percent Saudi GDP growth forecast for 2018.


Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

Updated 09 February 2026
Follow

Global trade isn’t deglobalizing — it’s reshuffling, Harvard economist says

ALULA: Global trade is not retreating into deglobalization despite geopolitical shocks, but is instead undergoing a structural reshuffling led by US-China tensions, according to Harvard University economist Pol Antras. 

Presenting research at the AlUla Emerging Market Economies Conference, Antras said there is no evidence that countries are systematically turning inward. Instead, trade flows are being redirected across markets, creating winners and losers depending on export structure and exposure to Chinese competition. 

This comes as debate intensifies over whether supply-chain disruptions, industrial policy and rising trade barriers signal the end of globalization after decades of expansion. 

Speaking to Arab News on the sidelines of the event, Antras said: “I think the right way to view it is more a reorganization, where things are moving from some countries to others rather than a general trend where countries are becoming more inward looking, in a sense of producers selling more of their stuff domestically than internationally, or consumers buying more domestic products than foreign products.”  

He said a change of that scale has not yet happened, which is important to recognize when navigating the reshuffling — a shift his research shows is driven by Chinese producers redirecting sales away from the US toward other economies. 

He added that countries are affected differently, but highlighted that the Kingdom’s position is relatively positive, stating: “In the case of Saudi Arabia, for instance, its export structure, what it exports, is very different than what China exports, so in that sense it’s better positioned so suffer less negative consequences of recent events.” 

He went on to say that economies likely to be more negatively impacted than the Kingdom would be those with more producers in sectors exposed to Chinese competition. He added that while many countries may feel inclined to follow the United States’ footsteps by implementing their own tariffs, he would advise against such a move.  

Instead, he pointed to supporting producers facing the shock as a better way to protect and prepare economies, describing it as a key step toward building resilience — a view Professor Antras underscored as fundamental. 

Elaborating on the Kingdom’s position amid rising tensions and structural reorganization, he said Saudi Arabia holds a relative advantage in its economic framework. 

“Saudi Arabia should not be too worried about facing increased competitive pressures in selling its exports to other markets, by its nature. On the other hand, there is a benefit of the current situation, which is when Chinese producers find it hard to sell in US market, they naturally pivot to other markets.” 

He said that pivot could benefit importing economies, including Saudi Arabia, by lowering Chinese export prices. The shift could increase the Kingdom’s import volumes from China while easing cost pressures for domestic producers.