Pet cloning is not just for celebrities anymore

This February 27, 2018, portrait courtesy of Monni Must shows a black Labrador puppy named Gunni (L) a clone of Billy Bean (R), essentially an identical twin born later and derived from Billy Bean’s DNA. (AFP)
Updated 03 March 2018
Follow

Pet cloning is not just for celebrities anymore

MIAMI: After photographer Monni Must’s 28-year-old daughter Miya committed suicide while in the midst of an abusive relationship, the grieving mother adopted Miya’s spunky black Labrador, Billy Bean.
Last year, as the 10th anniversary of her daughter’s death approached, the dog was nearing 13 and becoming increasingly frail.
“I knew that I was falling apart,” said Must.
“The thought of Billy dying was just more than I could handle.”
So she decided to clone her.
She paid more than $50,000 for what is essentially an identical twin of Billy, born at a later date.
“I have three other daughters and they thought I had completely lost my mind,” Must said.
Cloning animals is hardly new. The first major success was Dolly the sheep, born in 1996 as the first mammal cloned from an adult cell. In 2005, researchers in South Korea cloned the first dog.
But the news this week that singer Barbra Streisand had cloned her dog grabbed international headlines, and sparked fresh outrage from animal rights groups.
People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) president Ingrid Newkirk issued a statement saying she would “love to have talked her out of cloning,” noting that “millions of wonderful adoptable dogs are languishing in animal shelters every year or dying in terrifying ways when abandoned.”
Vicki Katrinak, program manager for animal research issues at the Humane Society of the United States, agreed.
Companies that clone animals are “preying on grieving pet owners, giving them a false promise that they are going to replicate their beloved pet,” she told AFP.
“Pet cloning doesn’t replicate a pet’s personality,” she said, adding there is “no justification” for the practice.
Just how many pets are cloned each year is unclear. The main US company engaged in the practice, ViaGen Pets, declined AFP’s requests for comment.
“We have produced thousands of happy, healthy cloned cows and hundreds of cloned horses,” says its website, adding that company scientists “have been developing successful animal cloning and reproductive technology for over 15 years.”
A former employee of ViaGen, who spoke to AFP on condition of anonymity, estimated that the Texas-based company has cloned around 100 cats and dogs.
The other main source for cloned pets is the Sooam Biotech Research Foundation in Seoul, South Korea, which says it has cloned some 800 pets and charges $100,000 each.
Many companies have tried and failed to make the pet cloning business work.
Ron Gillespie, a former cattle semen salesman, owns a company called PerPETuate, which collects pet DNA for $1,300 plus a storage fee.
They used to do pet cloning, but now farm it out to other companies like ViaGen Pets, he said.
His client list runs the gamut from rich to poor, he said.
“I have a homeless man and I have a celebrity,” said Gillespie, adding that the homeless man was not out on the street when he paid for to have his dog’s DNA frozen, but fell into dire financial straits afterward.
Now, he desperately wants “to get his dog back,” but is unsure if he will ever be able to pay for a clone, Gillespie said.
Dogs can be cloned up to five days after they die and cats up to three, as long as the corpses are kept cool, Gillespie said.
Ideally, though, the pet should be alive when the veterinarian takes a tissue biopsy, a chunk of skin and muscle about the size of a pencil eraser.
The next step is to take an egg cell from a donor dog, remove the egg’s nucleus, and insert DNA from the pet to be cloned.
When an embryo develops, it is transplanted in the womb of a surrogate dog.
Animal rights groups say the process causes undue suffering to the dogs that provide the egg cells and carry the embryos.
“Because cloning has a high failure rate, many dogs are caged and tormented for every birth that actually occurs,” said Newkirk.
Traits that will carry over can include temperament, physical characteristics and genetic flaws. Coat patterns may differ, and the cloned animal will have no awareness of the life its predecessor lived.
According to Must, the puppy that was cloned from Billy is playful and fearless, like her. They also share the same petite frame, shiny coat and big paws.
“They look exactly alike for sure. She will do things like Billy does, like putting her head down and rolling into your lap,” said Must.
She named the puppy Gunni, after the town in Colorado, Gunnison, where her daughter lived, and is grateful for the respite from grief the canine has provided.
She was born the same week as the anniversary of her daughter’s passing. The puppy’s first ultrasound took place — coincidentally — on Miya’s birthday.
“It was singularly one of the best decisions that I have made,” Must said.
“It has given me a new lease on life.”


Arts festival’s decision to exclude Palestinian author spurs boycott

Randa Abdel Fattah. (Photo/Wikipedia)
Updated 12 January 2026
Follow

Arts festival’s decision to exclude Palestinian author spurs boycott

  • A Macquarie University academic who researches Islamophobia and Palestine, Abdel-Fattah responded saying it was “a blatant and shameless act of anti-Palestinian racism and censorship,” with her lawyers issuing a letter to the festival

SYDENY: A top Australian arts festival has seen ​the withdrawal of dozens of writers in a backlash against its decision to bar an Australian Palestinian author after the Bondi Beach mass shooting, as moves to curb antisemitism spur free speech concerns.
The shooting which killed 15 people at a Jewish Hanukkah celebration at Sydney’s Bondi Beach on Dec. 14 sparked nationwide calls to tackle antisemitism. Police say the alleged gunmen were inspired by Daesh.
The Adelaide Festival board said last Thursday it would disinvite Randa ‌Abdel-Fattah from February’s ‌Writers Week in the state of South Australia because “it ‌would not ​be ‌culturally sensitive to continue to program her at this unprecedented time so soon after Bondi.”

FASTFACTS

• Abdel-Fattah responded, saying it was ‘a blatant and shameless act of anti-Palestinian racism and censorship.’

• Around 50 authors have since withdrawn from the festival in protest, leaving it in doubt, local media reported.

A Macquarie University academic who researches Islamophobia and Palestine, Abdel-Fattah responded saying it was “a blatant and shameless act of anti-Palestinian racism and censorship,” with her lawyers issuing a letter to the festival.
Around 50 authors have since withdrawn from the festival in protest, leaving it in doubt, local media reported.
Among the boycotting authors, Kathy Lette wrote on social media the decision to bar Abdel-Fattah “sends a divisive and plainly discriminatory message that platforming Australian Palestinians is ‘culturally insensitive.'”
The Adelaide Festival ‌said in a statement on Monday that three board ‍members and the chairperson had resigned. The ‍festival’s executive director, Julian Hobba, said the arts body was “navigating a complex moment.”

 a complex and ‍unprecedented moment” after the “significant community response” to the board decision.
In the days after the Bondi Beach attack, Jewish community groups and the Israeli government criticized Prime Minister Anthony Albanese for failing to act on a rise in antisemitic attacks and criticized protest marches against Israel’s war in ​Gaza held since 2023.
Albanese said last week a Royal Commission will consider the events of the shooting as well as antisemitism and ⁠social cohesion in Australia. Albanese said on Monday he would recall parliament next week to pass tougher hate speech laws.
On Monday, New South Wales state premier Chris Minns announced new rules that would allow local councils to cut off power and water to illegally operating prayer halls.
Minns said the new rules were prompted by the difficulty in closing a prayer hall in Sydney linked to a cleric found by a court to have made statements intimidating Jewish Australians.
The mayor of the western Sydney suburb of Fairfield said the rules were ill-considered and councils should not be responsible for determining hate speech.
“Freedom ‌of speech is something that should always be allowed, as long as it is done in a peaceful way,” Mayor Frank Carbone told Reuters.