Syrian opposition rejects Russian-sponsored talks

A displaced Syrian child is seen at the Ain Issa camp on Dec.18. Tens of thousands of civilians forced out of their homes by Syria’s war are spending yet another winter in flimsy plastic tents or abandoned half-finished buildings. (AFP) 
Updated 26 December 2017
Follow

Syrian opposition rejects Russian-sponsored talks

JEDDAH: Syrian opposition groups on Tuesday rejected a Russian-sponsored reconciliation conference on Syria, as Arab News reported on Sunday.
“Most of the opposition groups reject Russia’s Sochi initiative because it is useless to hold talks in an environment in which we cannot freely express our opinions,” Hisham Marwah, a representative of Syria’s opposition High Negotiations Committee (HNC), told Arab News.
Marwah was referring to Moscow’s condition for their attendance. Russia has ruled out the participation of any group that wants the ousting of Syrian President Bashar Assad.
Attacking Russia for coming up with the idea, the HNC official refused to “say what they would like to hear.”
The Congress for National Dialogue, planned for the Black Sea resort of Sochi on Jan. 29-30, was supposed to involve all the parties in the Syrian conflict in charting a course for the country’s future.
In a series of statements, 40 rebel groups, including some of Syria’s most prominent, as well as political opposition groups, said the talks, expected next month, are an attempt to “circumvent” the UN-led process, the Agence France Presse (AFP) reported.
The rebel groups said Moscow has asked them to give up their demand for Assad to step down.
“We reject this, and we affirm that Russia is an aggressor that has committed war crimes against Syrians,” the statement, signed by 40 rebel groups, said. “Russia has not contributed with a single move to alleviate the suffering of the Syrian people and it has not pressured the regime it claims it guarantees to move an inch toward any real path toward a resolution.”
Marwah told Arab News that the Russia-sponsored event appeared to be an attempt to divert the UN-led Geneva process and come up with initiatives that suit Assad’s and their own interests.
The HNC official said: “We are committed to the Security Council Resolutions 2258 and 2254.” He ruled out the possibility of accepting any other legal framework for the resolution of the Syrian crisis.
Other opposition factions also said they were committed to the UN-led Geneva process and called on the international community to help end the bloodshed.
Assad told reporters recently that the Sochi talks have a clear agenda of discussing new elections and possibly amending the constitution.
The Sochi congress, if it takes place, would open up a fourth track of negotiations between parties to the conflict. The UN’s own Geneva program has been supplemented by the “technical” talks in the Kazakh capital, Astana, brokered by Russia, Iran and Turkey. Russia periodically opens a third track through Cairo. Egypt has provided a base for Syrian reformists seen as acceptable to the Damascus government.
Russia has started establishing a permanent military presence at naval and air bases in Syria, Reuters reported on Tuesday.
As per the deal signed between Moscow and the Syrian regime, the Tartus naval facility will be expanded and grant Russian warships access to Syrian water and ports.
RIA news agency separately quoted Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu as saying: “Last week the Commander-in-Chief (President Vladimir Putin) approved the structure and the bases in Tartus and in Hmeimim (air base). We have begun forming a permanent presence there.”
Commenting on this development, Marwah said: “Russia is here to stay in Syria.”
He said the presence in Syria was in the strategic interest of Russia. The Syrian opposition member lamented the Russian dealings with a dictator. “Such measures taken by a major global power only prop up the regime and make Assad think he is in a strong position.”
Marwah urged Moscow to instead focus on the Syrian people, as “dictators don’t last long.”
 


The West Bank soccer field slated for demolition by Israel

Updated 13 sec ago
Follow

The West Bank soccer field slated for demolition by Israel

  • The move is likely to eliminate one of the few ​spaces where Palestinian children are able to run and play
BETHLEHEM: Israeli authorities have ordered the demolition of a soccer field in a crowded refugee camp in the occupied West Bank, eliminating one of the few ​spaces where Palestinian children are able to run and play.
“If the field gets demolished, this will destroy our dreams and our future. We cannot play any other place but this field, the camp does not have spaces,” said Rital Sarhan, 13, who plays on a girls’ soccer team in the Aida refugee camp near Bethlehem.
The Israeli military ‌issued a demolition ‌order for the soccer field on ‌December ⁠31, ​saying ‌it was built illegally in an area that abuts the concrete barrier wall that Israel built in the West Bank.
“Along the security fence, a seizure order and a construction prohibition order are in effect; therefore, the construction in the area was carried out unlawfully,” the Israeli military said in a statement.
Mohammad Abu ⁠Srour, an administrator at Aida Youth Center, which manages the field, said the ‌military gave them seven days to demolish ‍the field.
The Israeli military ‍often orders Palestinians to carry out demolitions themselves. If they ‍do not act, the military steps in to destroy the structure in question and then sends the Palestinians a bill for the costs.
According to Abu Srour, Israel’s military told residents when delivering ​the demolition order that the soccer field represented a threat to the separation wall and to Israelis.
“I ⁠do not know how this is possible,” he said.
Israeli demolitions have drawn widespread international criticism and coincide with heightened fears among Palestinians of an organized effort by Israel to formally annex the West Bank, the area seized by Israel in the 1967 Middle East war. Israel accelerated demolitions in Palestinian refugee camps in early 2025, leading to the displacement of 32,000 residents of camps in the central and northern West Bank. Human Rights Watch has called the demolitions a war crime. ‌Israel has said they are intended to disrupt militant activity.