Rwanda’s Paul Kagame: Visionary, despot, or both?

A bus adorned with an image of incumbent Rwandan President Paul Kagame at the central bus station in Kigali, in this July 30 photo. (AFP)
Updated 01 August 2017
Follow

Rwanda’s Paul Kagame: Visionary, despot, or both?

KIGALI, Rwanda: Paul Kagame is revered for stopping Rwanda’s genocide and engineering what admirers call an economic miracle, but his critics see a despot who crushes all opposition and rules through fear.
The 59-year-old former guerrilla fighter is seeking a third term in office in Aug. 4 polls after voters massively approved a constitutional amendment allowing him to run again and potentially stay in office for another two decades.
Kagame frames his run as a duty to his country. However, the move angered international allies whose patience has worn thin with a man once held up as a shining example of successful post-colonial leadership in Africa.
Yet the president of the tiny central African nation has become one of Africa’s most powerful and admired leaders. His counterparts, inspired by Rwanda’s turnaround, have tasked him with reforming the African Union (AU).
Shattered by the 1994 genocide and with not a franc left in the national treasury when Kagame took over, Rwanda is now growing at an average 7 percent a year while Kigali has transformed into a capital with a gleaming skyline, spotless, safe streets and zero tolerance for corruption.
“Kagame is known as a doer and an implementer, not somebody who says things just like everyone else,” said Desire Assogbavi, Oxfam’s liason to the AU who also blogs regularly about the body.
His close friend Tony Blair hails him as a “visionary leader” for the remarkable development he has brought about.
The president’s personality — described as “unapologetically authoritarian” by author Philip Gourevitch, who wrote a powerful account of the genocide — was forged by growing up in exile.
In 1960, when he was three, his aristocratic Tutsi family fled to neighboring Uganda to escape pogroms.
While out of danger, they suffered years of discrimination and persecution that nourished the dream of going back to the homeland they idealized.
Serving in Ugandan President Yoweri Museveni’s rebel force before and after it seized power in 1986, he rose to become its intelligence chief.
Kagame — the only president known to have had military training both in the US and Cuba — later took over command of a small rebel force of Rwandan exiles that sneaked back home hoping to overthrow the regime of Juvenal Habyarimana in 1990, sparking civil war.
Habyarimana’s death in a plane crash in 1994 triggered three months of genocide, mostly of minority Tutsis by youths in the Hutu majority whipped into a frenzy of hate.
Kagame, a father of four, was just 36 when his Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF) rebel army routed the forces who had slaughtered an estimated 800,000 people and seized Kigali, becoming the de facto leader of the nation.
Kagame soon became the darling of an international community deeply ashamed at having stood by during the genocide, even as his RPF was accused of killing tens of thousands of people in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) while pursuing genocide perpetrators.
It was accusations Kagame was backing rebel groups in the DRC — which he staunchly denies — that finally pushed his allies to take a tougher line, with several suspending aid to Rwanda in 2012.
And criticism has grown louder over his rights record.
Kagame’s critics have ended up jailed, forced into exile or assassinated. Rights groups slam the repression of the media and opposition.
Kagame won elections in 2003 and 2010 with 95 and 93 percent respectively. Observers say real opponents are silenced while those allowed to run in elections serve as a democratic facade.
One of Rwanda’s rare critical journalists, Robert Mugabe, describes Kagame as the quintessential modern dictator.
“We have a new breed of dictators... they hire PR agencies they form a narrative and these dictators are smart enough to know what the western world wants to see and wants to hear.”


Japan reaffirms no-nukes pledge after senior official suggests acquiring weapons

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Japan reaffirms no-nukes pledge after senior official suggests acquiring weapons

  • The unnamed official said Japan needed nuclear weapons because of a worsening security environment
  • At a regular press briefing in Tokyo, Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara said Japan’s nuclear policy had ‌not changed
TOKYO: Japan reaffirmed its decades-old pledge never to possess nuclear weapons on Friday after local media reported that a senior security official suggested the country should ​acquire them to deter potential aggressors. The unnamed official said Japan needed nuclear weapons because of a worsening security environment but acknowledged that such a move would be politically difficult, public broadcaster NHK and other outlets reported, describing the official as being from Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s office.
At a regular press briefing in Tokyo, Chief Cabinet Secretary Minoru Kihara said Japan’s nuclear policy had ‌not changed, but declined ‌to comment on the remarks or ‌to ⁠say whether ​the ‌person would remain in government. There is a growing political and public willingness in Japan to loosen its three non-nuclear principles not to possess, develop or allow nuclear weapons, a Reuters investigation published in August found.
This is driven in part by doubts over the reliability of US security guarantees under President Donald Trump and growing threats from nuclear-armed ⁠China, Russia and North Korea.
Japan hosts the largest overseas concentration of US military forces ‌and has maintained a security alliance with Washington ‍for decades.
Some lawmakers within Takaichi’s ‍ruling Liberal Democratic Party have said the United States should ‍be allowed to bring nuclear weapons into Japan on submarines or other platforms to reinforce deterrence. Takaichi last month stirred debate on her own stance by declining to say whether there would be any changes to the ​three principles when her administration formulates a new defense strategy next year.
“Putting these trial balloons out creates an opportunity ⁠to start to build consensus around the direction to move on changes in security policy,” said Stephen Nagy, professor at the department of politics and international studies at the International Christian University in Tokyo.
Beijing’s assertiveness and growing missile cooperation between Moscow and Pyongyang are “creating the momentum to really change Japan’s thinking about security,” he added.
Discussions about acquiring or hosting nuclear weapons are highly sensitive in the only country to have suffered atomic bombings, and risk unsettling neighboring countries, including China.
Ties between Tokyo and Beijing worsened last month after Takaichi said a ‌Chinese attack on Taiwan that also threatened Japan could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” and trigger a military response.