Cow crackdown puts India’s meat industry on edge

In this photograph taken on March 25, 2017, an Indian man unloads a buffalo near an abattoir in Meerut. (AFP)
Updated 31 March 2017
Follow

Cow crackdown puts India’s meat industry on edge

MEERUT, INDIA: Not a buffalo in sight as businessman Haji Shadab paced the silent abattoir, his meat shipments indefinitely on hold as India reels from a crisis threatening its reputation as the world’s largest buffalo meat exporter.
A zealous campaign to protect cows — considered sacred by Hindus — by a new right-wing government in Uttar Pradesh state has sent India’s $4.8 billion buffalo meat industry into a tailspin as slaughterhouses have closed and exports stalled.
Hindu hard-liners have long accused abattoirs — largely run by Muslims — of covering up the slaughter of cows and passing off the meat as buffalo, which are not revered as holy.
In Uttar Pradesh, those radical Hindus have a new hero: Yogi Adityanath, a firebrand priest who took office in March promising tougher penalties for cow slaughter and a crackdown on illegal slaugtherhouses.
Just days after he was sworn in, three Muslim-run butcher shops in Hathras were torched — a bad omen for India’s largest meat-producing state, home to more than half its abattoirs.
Police then began shutting butcheries, some of which had been operating for decades, for alleged violations of local laws, grinding Uttar Pradesh’s entire buffalo meat industry to a halt.
Outraged butchers launched a statewide strike Monday, while for exporters like Shadab — who ships around 70 tons of buffalo meat a day to Asia and the Middle East — his supply of livestock dried up.
“We are not taking fresh orders from clients while the situation here is unclear,” Shadab told AFP at his Meerut slaughterhouse, which employed 1,500 staff before he sent them home until further notice.
“But in the long term, buyers will certainly move to other countries if we can’t deliver.”

The crippling buffalo shortage is being felt economy-wide in Uttar Pradesh, a state of 200 million where more than one in 10 are directly involved in meat and related businesses like leatherwork and transportation, industry figures show.
In Lucknow, restaurants which have been selling buffalo kebabs for more than a century have pulled the signature dish from the menu, unable to source the meat.
“You can see for yourself what impact this is having. We’ve hardly got any customers,” Yahaya Rizwan told AFP at his deserted eatery Mubeen’s.
Even the city zoo has resorted to feeding lions and tigers white meat to counter the buffalo shortage, said zoo director Anupam Gupta.
Cow slaughter is illegal in Uttar Pradesh and many other states, with some enforcing life sentences.
But it is Hindu vigilantes, emboldened by the government clamp down, that have businesses most on edge.
Farmers, wary of “cow protection” squads forcefully inspecting trucks for signs of the holy animal, were unwilling to make their usual deliveries, business owners told AFP.
“They are a little scared,” said DB Sabharwall from the Indian meat association.
Rumours of cow slaughter can spark murderous reprisals in the religiously divided state, where nearly one in five is Muslim.
Authorities insist the shutdowns are motivated by regulation, not religion, claiming only businesses without licenses will be targeted.
But in a butcher’s alley in Meerut, dozens of Muslim meat vendors proudly displayed their trading permits outside their shuttered shops.
“Everything was fine before Yogi came to power,” said butcher Riyaz Babu Qureshi.
“We’ve never faced this situation before. It’s terrible.”

Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s ruling party appointed Adityanath after winning Uttar Pradesh in a landslide, handing the reins of India’s most important state to an ideologue known for his inflammatory rhetoric against Muslims.
Modi has sought to keep his party’s Hindu nationalism at arm’s length since taking power in 2014, but the slaughterhouse crackdown has raised doubts about his proclaimed commitment to economic growth and job creation.
“This is totally anti-business. It will dent India’s image globally,” Shadab said.
Meat businessman Shahid Akhlaq, who sent 3,000 workers home when three of his factories were shut, expressed dismay that a witch-hunt over cows was taking precedence over their livelihoods.
“The government claims ‘together for all, development for all’, but we don’t see that happening on the ground,” Akhlaq told AFP, quoting Modi’s campaign slogan.
“When you target a particular community, it definitely creates fear.”


South Korea court sentences former first lady to jail term for bribery

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

South Korea court sentences former first lady to jail term for bribery

  • Prosecutors had sought a 15-year jail term for the wife of ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol
  • Kim Keon Hee has been detained since August and denied all charges
SEOUL: A South Korean court sentenced former first lady Kim Keon Hee on Wednesday to one year and eight months in jail after finding her guilty of accepting Chanel bags and a diamond pendant from Unification Church officials in return for political favors.
The court cleared Kim, the wife of ex-President Yoon Suk Yeol who was ousted from office last year, on charges of stock price manipulation and violating the political funds act.
Prosecutors will appeal against the two not-guilty verdicts, media reports said.
The ruling, which can also be appealed by the former first lady, comes amid a series of trials following investigations into ‌Yoon’s brief imposition ‌of martial law in 2024 and related scandals involving the once-powerful couple.
The ‌position ⁠of first lady ‌does not come with any formal power allowing involvement in state affairs, but she is a symbolic figure representing the country, the lead judge of a three-justice bench said.
“A person who was in such a position might not always be a role model, but the person must not be a bad example to the public,” he said in the ruling.
The court ordered her to pay a 12.8 million won ($8,990) fine and ordered the confiscation of the diamond necklace. Kim has been held in detention since August while she was being investigated by a ⁠team led by a special prosecutor.
Prosecutors had demanded 15 years in jail and fines of 2.9 billion won over all the accusations she ‌faced.
The court cleared Kim on charges of manipulating stock prices and ‍violating political funding laws.
Kim had denied all ‍the charges. Her lawyer said the team would review the ruling and decide whether to appeal the ‍bribery conviction.
Kim, clad in a dark suit and wearing a face mask, was escorted by guards into the courtroom at the Seoul Central District Court and sat quietly while the verdict was delivered.
Supporters of Yoon and Kim, who braved freezing temperatures outside the court compound, cheered after the not-guilty verdicts on two of the charges were delivered.
The Unification Church said the gifts were delivered to her without expecting anything. Its leader Han Hak-ja, who is also on trial, has denied that she directed it to bribe Kim.
Shaman, ⁠political broker
Kim had drawn intense public scrutiny even before her husband was elected president in 2022 over questions about her academic records and lingering suspicion that she had been long involved in manipulating stock prices.
Her alleged association with a political broker and a person known as a shaman also drew public criticism that the two may be unduly influencing the former first couple.
Yoon, who was ousted from power last April, also faces eight trials on charges including insurrection, after his failed bid to impose martial law in December 2024.
He has appealed against a five-year jail term handed to him this month for obstructing attempts to arrest him after his martial law decree.
At a separate trial this month, prosecutors have sought the death penalty for Yoon on the charge of masterminding an insurrection. The court will rule on the case on February 19.
Yoon has argued it was within his powers ‌as president to declare martial law and that the action was aimed at sounding the alarm over the obstruction of government by opposition parties.