Factory smoke clouds China pollution pledges

Updated 21 January 2013
Follow

Factory smoke clouds China pollution pledges

Clouds of smoke billow from the chimneys at a Chinese chemical plant rumbling with activity, more than a year after authorities closed it following protests by thousands of people.
The factory in Dalian was ordered to halt work and relocate 17 months ago after local residents took to the streets, fearing a toxic chemical spill that might poison them and their children.
But now it appears to be functioning, although at what capacity is unclear.
The apparent U-turn raises questions about how China’s communist rulers, ever fearful of social unrest, can deal with its pollution problem while also retaining the manufacturing operations that have powered economic growth.
Across China public frustration mounted this week as dense smog blanketed swathes of the country, with even state-run media questioning the authorities’ ability to meet their goal of building a “beautiful China.”
The darkened skies prompted premier-to-be Li Keqiang to call for stricter enforcement of environmental protections — but failing to fulfil even simpler promises such as shutting the plant in Dalian could further prime popular anger.
“They have no intention of moving” regardless of company and government promises, said a local resident surnamed Zhao, 31, who said he worked near the plant until eight months ago.
“They have never even stopped operating,” he said, expressing a distrust in the local government echoed by other residents.
Zhao said he switched jobs to escape the “nose-stinging” stench in the area — a sprawling industrial zone with mammoth pipes and storage towers that churns out everything from ship parts to electricity. “The smell there was too much. Working there long-term was not good for one’s health,” Zhao said, adding that he still suffers from a nagging cough.
About 12,000 people demonstrated in the center of the northeastern city in August 2011 after waves from an approaching storm breached the seaside plant’s protective dyke, forcing residents to be evacuated and raising fears of a toxic spill.
The factory produced paraxylene, or PX, a flammable carcinogenic liquid used to make polyester films and fabrics.
Authorities pledged to shut the plant and move it to a remote location, while the company, Dalian Fujia Dahua Petrochemical, agreed to “immediately carry out work to stop the PX project,” the Dalian Daily reported at the time.
But a local government official later told media the factory had resumed operations after meeting certain standards.
Others reached by AFP declined to comment, saying only that relocation plans were in the works, while three company employees refused to confirm or deny whether production was continuing.
Tang Zailin, the head of a local environmental group, said his members were watching to see if authorities would eventually move the plant.
He urged them to take seriously a call by President Hu Jintao in a key speech in November to build a more “beautiful China.”
“’Beautiful’ has to include a nice environment, right?” Tang said.
Since July mass protests in at least three cities — some with violent incidents — have forced industrial projects to be canceled. In the eastern city of Ningbo, residents said they doubted authorities would keep their word.

In November the environment minister Zhou Shengxian promised that all major future projects would undergo “social impact assessments.”
Such studies might help avoid protest, said environmental lawyer Wang Canfa, but ultimately factories should be opened or shut based on written codes rather than public duress — which could unfairly punish companies in compliance.
“The key is whether or not they meet the requirements of the law,” said Wang, who runs a legal aid center in Beijing for pollution victims.
“This approach of promising to stop work and then restarting after people stop making a fuss, without giving the public any explanation or information — the biggest victim will be the government’s credibility,” he said.
“The next time they say something, the people will not believe them.”


Eating snow cones or snow cream can be a winter delight, if done safely

Updated 28 January 2026
Follow

Eating snow cones or snow cream can be a winter delight, if done safely

  • As the storm recedes, residents of lesser-affected areas might be tempted to whip up bowls of “snow cream”
  • Fassnacht said he tried “snow cream” for the first time last year when some students made him some

WASHINGTON: Take two snowballs and call me in the morning?
Dr. Sarah Crockett, who specializes in emergency and wilderness medicine, doesn’t explicitly tell her patients at New Hampshire’s Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center to swallow snow, but she often prescribes more time outside. If that time includes eating a handful of ice crystals straight or adding ingredients to make snow cones and other frozen treats, she’s all for it.
“To stop and just be present and want to catch a snowflake on your tongue, or scoop up some fresh, white, untouched snow that’s collected during something as exciting as a snowstorm, I think that there’s space in our world to enjoy that,” Crockett said. “And while we need to make good choices, I think these are simple things that can bring joy.”
Getting outdoors to enjoy simple pleasures is unlikely to be front of mind for people in a 1,300-mile (2,100-kilometer) stretch of the United States where a massive weekend storm brought deep snow and bitter cold. Freezing rain and ice brought down power lines and tree limbs, leaving hundreds of thousands of homes without power or heating in the South, while snow upended road and air travel from Arkansas to New England.
As the storm recedes, residents of lesser-affected areas might be tempted to whip up bowls of “snow cream” — snow combined with milk, sugar and vanilla — after seeing techniques demonstrated on TikTok. Others might want to try “sugar on snow,” a taffy-like confection made by pouring hot maple syrup onto a plate of snow.
Despite its pristine appearance, snow isn’t always clean enough to consume. Crockett and other experts shared advice for digging in safely while digging out.
The science of snow
Whether it’s rain or snow, precipitation cleans the atmosphere, picking up pollutants as it falls, said Steven Fassnacht, a professor of snow hydrology at Colorado State University. But snowflakes pick up more impurities because they fall more slowly and have more exposed surface areas than raindrops, he said.
That means snow that falls near coal plants or factories that emit particulates into the air contains more contaminants, said Fassnacht, who was in Shinjo, Japan, last week studying the salt content of snow. He said he wouldn’t have hesitated to take a taste there because there weren’t any big industrial complexes upwind.
“Snow can be eaten, but you want to think about the trajectory. Where did that snow come from?” he said.
Timing is another consideration, according to Crockett. The first wave of snow holds the most particulate matter, she said, so waiting until a storm is well underway before putting out a bowl to collect falling snow is one precaution to take.
Ground contamination is an additional factor, experts say. Avoiding yellow snow, which may be tainted by urine or tree bark, is conventional wisdom, but it’s also a good idea to stay away from any snow pushed by snowplows and packed with road salt, deicing chemicals and debris.
Snack versus survival
What about eating snow to survive? Crockett, who oversees the wilderness medicine program at Dartmouth College’s Geisel School of Medicine, says that’s a bad idea.
The energy it takes to melt snow in your mouth as you’re eating it essentially counteracts the hydration benefit, plus it decreases your core body temperature and increases the risk of hypothermia. While outdoor enthusiasts who plan to spend days in the mountains often melt and boil snow to purify it for drinking, it shouldn’t be viewed as an immediate hydration source, she said.
“If you are disoriented on a local hike, I would say your number one priority is to try to reach out for help in any way you can, ... not ‘Can I eat enough snow?’” Crockett said.
Focus on rewards, not risks
Fassnacht, who has studied snow for more than 30 years, said he tried “snow cream” for the first time last year when some students made him some. He described it as a fun experience that got him thinking about flavors and textures, not contaminants.
“It’s a whimsical thing,” he said. “It made me think about what are the characteristics of that freshly fallen snow, and how does that change the taste sensation?”
Crockett likewise is a fan of finding inspiration and wonder in nature. She worries that overprotective parenting has contributed to anxiety in some young people, and that excessive warnings about eating snow could add to that.
“We have to strike that right balance of making sure we’re avoiding danger while not being so protective that we encourage this ‘Everything is going to harm me’ mentality, particularly for children,” she said.
Crockett has four children, including a daughter she described as a “passionate snow eater.” As the recent winter storm got underway, she asked her why she liked eating snow so much and was told, “It makes me feel connected to the Earth.”
“That is actually something that’s really important to me, that we all have this connection to nature,” Crockett said.