Israeli decision to extend unlawful control over West Bank condemned

A boy jumps across a water puddle between tents sheltering people displaced by war at the Bureij camp for Palestinian refugees in the central Gaza Strip on February 24, 2026. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 24 February 2026
Follow

Israeli decision to extend unlawful control over West Bank condemned

  • The West Bank is among the territories that Palestinians seek for a future independent state. Much of it is under Israeli military control, with limited Palestinian self-rule in some areas
  • Hamas seeks sanctions against occupiers

ISTANBUL, GAZA: The ‌foreign ministers of Brazil, France, Spain, Turkiye and various other states condemned Israeli decisions that ​introduce sweeping extensions to unlawful Israeli control over the West Bank.

“Changes are wide-ranging, reclassifying Palestinian land as so-called Israeli ‘state land’, accelerating illegal settlement activity, and further entrenching Israeli administration,” said the joint statement, ‌issued by ​the ‌Turkish Foreign Ministry.
Other ​countries to sign the statement included Saudi Arabia, Egypt and Qatar, as well as the heads of the Arab League and Organization of Islamic Cooperation.
They “are part of a clear trajectory that aims to change the reality on the ground and to advance unacceptable de facto annexation,” the countries said.
“Such actions are a deliberate and direct attack on the viability of the Palestinian state and the implementation of the two-state solution.”
Israel’s Cabinet on Feb. 15 approved further measures to tighten Israel’s control ‌over the occupied ‌West Bank and make ​it easier for ‌settlers to buy land, a move ‌Palestinians called a “de-facto annexation.” 
The joint statement said the settlements, and decisions designed to further them, are “a flagrant violation of international law” and a step toward “unacceptable de facto annexation.”
It said they also undermine the ongoing efforts for peace and stability in the region and ​threaten any ​meaningful prospect of regional integration.
Hamas called for sanctions against Israel, welcoming the  joint condemnation by nearly 20 countries.
Hamas hailed the condemnation as “a step in the right direction in confronting the occupation’s expansionist plans, which flagrantly violate international law and relevant UN resolutions.”
The group in a statement urged the countries involved “to impose deterrent sanctions and exert pressure on the fascist occupation government to halt its policies aimed at entrenching annexation, colonial settlement and forced displacement.”
It said the Israeli measures were part of ongoing “aggression” against Palestinians in the West Bank and Gaza.
In addition to roughly 3 million Palestinians, more than 500,000 Israelis live in settlements and outposts in the West Bank, which are considered illegal under international law.
Israel’s current government has accelerated settlement expansion, approving a record 54 settlements in 2025, according to activists.
Meanwhile, more than a dozen international humanitarian organizations have petitioned Israel’s Supreme Court to block an imminent order that would force 37 NGOs to cease operations in Gaza, the West Bank and East Jerusalem, warning of catastrophic consequences for Palestinians.
Organizations including Doctors Without Borders or MSF, Oxfam, the Norwegian Refugee Council and CARE were notified on December 30, 2025 that their Israeli registrations had expired and that they had 60 days to renew them by providing lists of their Palestinian staff.
If they fail to do so, they will have to cease operations in Gaza and the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, from March 1. The petition, described as unprecedented in its scale, seeks an urgent interim injunction from Israel’s top court to suspend the closures pending full judicial review.
The 17 petitioners, which include some of the NGOs hit by the ban, argue the Israeli measures are incompatible with an occupying power’s obligations under international humanitarian law.
The NGOs say compliance would expose local employees to potential retaliation, undermine the principle of humanitarian neutrality and violate European data protection law.
“Turning humanitarian organizations into an information-gathering arm for a party to the conflict stands in total contradiction to the principle of neutrality,” the petition states.
According to the UN, 133 NGO workers have been killed in the Gaza Strip since the war started on Oct. 7, 2023, including 15 MSF employees.
The petitioners say they have proposed practical alternatives to handing over staff lists to Israel, including “independent sanctions screening” and “donor-audited vetting systems.”
The organizations say that they collectively support or implement more than half of all food assistance in Gaza, 60 percent of field hospital operations and all inpatient treatment for children suffering severe acute malnutrition.
Audrey Rayburn, director of AIDA, an umbrella organization of international NGOs working in Palestinian territories, said that NGO presence in Gaza, where foreign media is not allowed, also allows outsiders to witness the war.
The petitioners say enforcement has already begun in practice, with supplies blocked and visas denied to foreign staff.
“We haven’t been able to get international staff inside Gaza since the beginning of January. Israeli authorities denied any entry to Gaza, but also to the West Bank,” MSF head of mission in the Palestinian territories Filipe Ribeiro said last week.
“For the time being, we are still working in Gaza, and we plan to keep running our operations as long as we can,” he added.
The ban comes as Israel hardens its stance toward humanitarian actors in general, having banned the UN agency for Palestinian refugees, UNRWA, from Israel in early 2025.
UNRWA, whom Israel accused of employing people who took part in Hamas’s Oct. 7 attack, also can no longer coordinate with Israeli authorities in the occupied West Bank, as will be the case for the banned, or deregistered, NGOs.
The absence of coordination with Israel complicates operations by denying entry to Israel, the West Bank or Gaza to foreign aid workers or by denying direct contact to plan around Israeli military operations in the Palestinian territory.
“We are arguing that Israel acted here without any authority, because according to the Oslo Accords, the whole registration of organizations issue was handled by the Palestinian Authority,” Yotam Ben-Hillel, an Israeli attorney who filed the appeal for the international organizations, said.

 


Trump demands role in choosing next Iran leader, Khamenei's son ‘unacceptable’

Updated 16 sec ago
Follow

Trump demands role in choosing next Iran leader, Khamenei's son ‘unacceptable’

  • US president tells Axios US would likely return to war within five years without a favorable leader in Iran
  • Draws parallel with Venezuela where interim president Delcy Rodriguez has cooperated under threat of violence
WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump on Thursday insisted he should have a role in picking Iran’s next supreme leader after the killing of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, whose son he said he found unacceptable.
“Khamenei’s son is a lightweight. I have to be involved in the appointment, like with Delcy,” Trump told Axios in an interview, drawing a comparison to Venezuela, where interim president Delcy Rodriguez has cooperated with him under threat of violence after the United States ousted her boss, Nicolas Maduro.
Trump told the news outlet that the United States would likely return to war within five years without a favorable leader in Iran.
“Khamenei’s son is unacceptable to me. We want someone that will bring harmony and peace to Iran,” Trump was quoted saying by the news outlet.
It was unclear in what way Trump would be able to take a role in the Islamic republic’s selection of a new supreme leader, a decision made by an assembly of senior Shiite Muslim clerics mostly staunchly opposed to the United States. Trump was raised a Presbyterian.
But his remarks imply a willingness to work with someone from within the Islamic republic rather than seek to topple the government, which has been a sworn enemy of the United States since the 1979 Islamic revolution toppled the pro-Western shah.
The late shah’s son, Reza Pahlavi, has proposed that he return as a transitional figure before Iran drafts a new constitution as a secular democracy. Pahlavi earlier Thursday said that any new supreme leader within the Islamic republic would be illegitimate.
Ali Khamenei, who ruled Iran since 1989 with hard-line policies that included repression at home and confrontation with neighboring countries, was killed Saturday in an Israeli strike as Israel and the United States opened war.
His son, Mojtaba Khamenei, is considered one of the contenders to succeed his father, who was only the second supreme leader after revolutionary leader Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini.
In Venezuela, Trump ordered a deadly January 3 attack in which US forces snatched Maduro, a longtime US nemesis.
Rather than backing the opposition long championed by the United States, Trump has said he has been pleased by Rodriguez, who was Maduro’s vice president but has cooperated on key US demands, notably on benefiting oil companies.
She is doing so under Trump’s threat of violence if she does not do what he wants, particularly on access to natural resources.