Pakistani visas fetch up to $1,800 as Kabul black market thrives

Passengers stand in a queue to board a Pakistan International Airlines flight in Kabul on Sept. 13, 2021. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 24 February 2026
Follow

Pakistani visas fetch up to $1,800 as Kabul black market thrives

  • Arab News investigates how Afghans resort to tour agents to obtain Pakistani travel documents
  • Applicants say that following official channels only ends in silent rejection after months of waiting

KABUL: As they prepare to fly to Islamabad from Kabul, Asma and her father have paid far more than the official ticket price. Hidden in their travel costs are additional thousands of dollars — fees to tour agents, which they say were the most reliable way to secure a visa to be on board.

Asma’s destination is not Pakistan, but she has no choice and must go there first, as most diplomatic missions in Afghanistan suspended full consular services in 2021, when US-led forces left the country and the Taliban took power.

Waiting for years to reunite with her fiance, who lives in Switzerland, Asma needs to reach the Swiss Embassy for an interview. But first, she had to obtain a Pakistani visa.

After months of trying through official channels, her family finally chose another, more expensive way.

“We heard from neighbors that some agencies in Kabul could get it done faster,” Asma told Arab News. “I had no choice … The embassy requires a face-to-face meeting before they will issue my visa to join him. Pakistan is the closest option with a Swiss diplomatic mission.”

She paid $1,600 to a travel agency in Kabul that promised expedited processing. Her father, who must accompany her due to Afghanistan’s strict travel rules for unmarried women, was part of the same application.

Having spent $3,200, they received their visas on WhatsApp three days later — not through official channels but through a cousin’s contact.

“Pakistan was our only option. Iran is too difficult. Turkey is too expensive. Pakistan is close, and many Afghans go there,” Asma’s father said.

“We will fly after making an online appointment with the (Swiss) Embassy. There are daily flights from Kabul to Islamabad.”

Asma’s case is not unique, as a sprawling black market for Pakistani visas has taken root in Afghanistan’s capital. An investigation by Arab News has found that desperate applicants have been paying between $1,300 and $1,800 to tour agents to obtain the travel documents that officially cost over 50 times less.

Pakistan’s visa fee for Afghan nationals is approximately $25, paid through a fully digital online system. But applicants who attempt to follow through this channel say the process often ends in silent rejection after months of waiting.

Multiple travel agencies in Kabul and Nangarhar confirmed to Arab News that Pakistani visas are traded on the black market. While they said their services facilitated legitimate travel, most refused to speak on the record, citing the Taliban penal code, which criminalizes human trafficking.

One agency owner who agreed to speak anonymously described a system organized around waiting lists and contacts at the Pakistani Embassy and consulates in Kabul, Nangarhar, Kandahar and Mazar-e-Sharif.

“We have lists. Each list works like seats on a plane. When one list is full, we start filling the next. Every day, a list goes out — meaning visas are issued daily,” he said.

“Some contacts take less, some demand more. But these days, no visa costs less than $1,300, and none exceed $1,800. This rate has been stable for over a month.”

The figures align with those reported by multiple applicants and confirmed by other agencies. Medical visas cost between $1,300 and $1,500, while tourist visas range from $1,500 to $1,800.

The prices have increased lately, coinciding with deteriorating relations between Afghanistan and Pakistan. Earlier, a medical visa at the same travel agency would cost $350, while a tourist one would cost about $600.

“As tensions between our countries increased, official oversight collapsed,” the agency’s owner said. “The visas found their way to the black market because there is no official interest in monitoring or controlling what happens.”

The Pakistani Embassy in Kabul did not respond to requests for comment, despite repeated requests through official channels and WhatsApp.

“The embassy knows. The travel agencies registered with them — we are the only channel,” said a manager of another travel agency, which deals in visas.

“Some agencies have stronger links inside the embassy than others. That affects the price. But nothing gets done without us.”


Trump takes unconventional approach to communicating to the public about war in Iran

Updated 03 March 2026
Follow

Trump takes unconventional approach to communicating to the public about war in Iran

  • The communications strategy opened Trump to criticism that he hadn’t done enough to explain the rationale and objectives of the war

Typical of an unconventional presidency, the Trump administration waited more than 48 hours to make any live, public communication to the American people about why it had decided to go to war with Iran.
President Donald Trump discussed why he launched the attack prior to a White House ceremony honoring military heroes on Monday but took no questions from reporters. Earlier in the day, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine briefed journalists at the Pentagon.
The two days previous, Trump delivered two pretaped statements that were released on Truth Social, the social media site owned by the president’s media company, and granted telephone interviews to more than a dozen journalists — several of which produced fragmented responses that, to some, clouded as much as they cleared up.
The communications strategy opened Trump to criticism that he hadn’t done enough to explain the rationale and objectives of the war, even as the American military suffered its first casualties. By contrast, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who has teamed with the US against Iran, delivered two statements the day the war began and addressed reporters Monday at the site of a missile attack that killed nine people. The Israeli military has held multiple press briefings each day.
“The American people need a commander in chief, and he has been absent in that role,” Rahm Emanuel, White House chief of staff under President Barack Obama, said on CNN Monday. Emanuel, a Democrat, is contemplating a run for the presidency in 2028.
An unconventional strategy leads to criticism
Peter Baker, chief White House correspondent for The New York Times, wrote on social media that “after Trump launched a new war on Iran, he did not rush back to the White House to make an Oval Office address to rally the nation as other presidents have done. He stayed at Mar-a-Lago to attend a glitzy political fundraiser.”
That post provoked a response from Steven Cheung, White House communications director. “Imagine being a reporter so consumed with Trump Derangement Syndrome that he wants President Trump to mimic the failed policies of the past. The truth is that President Trump spent the majority of his time monitoring the situation in a secure facility, in constant contact with world leaders, and made multiple addresses to the nation that garnered hundreds of millions of views. He also took dozens of calls with reporters.”
The calls included one with Baker’s colleague at The Times, Zolan Kanno-Youngs. Trump’s mobile phone number is known to many of the reporters who cover him, and the president often takes their calls for on-the-spot interviews. Besides The Times, he spoke in the aftermath of the attack to journalists for ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, CNBC, Fox News Channel, The Atlantic, The Washington Post, Axios, Politico and an Israeli television station.
Most of the calls were brief and marginally illuminating; Politico’s Dasha Burns said Trump answered but said he was too busy to talk. The public couldn’t hear what Trump said in the interviews and was dependent upon what the journalists chose to report on the conversations.
“I spoke to President Trump today and he told me that the operation in Iran is going to go very fast,” Libby Alon, a reporter for Channel 14 News in Israel, wrote about her interview on X. “It’s doing very well, and (will) make the people of Israel very happy, and the people of the world very happy.”
The Times reported that in its six-minute chat, Trump “offered several seemingly contradictory visions of how power might be transferred to a new government — or even whether the existing Iranian power structure would run that government or be overthrown.”
In one of his two conversations with Trump, ABC News’ Jonathan Karl said when he asked about the death of Iranian Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, the president said: “I got him before he got me. They tried twice. Well I got him first.” CNN’s Jake Tapper went on the air minutes after his conversation Monday, saying Trump told him “the big one is coming soon,” an apparent reference to a future attack.
Asked for comment, White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said: “President Trump is the most transparent and accessible president in American history. The American people have never had a more direct and authentic relationship with a president of the United States than they have with President Trump.”
Hegseth briefing concentrates on friendly reporters
Pentagon reporters learned late Sunday about Hegseth’s briefing. Reporters from The Associated Press, Reuters, ABC, CBS, NBC, CNN, Fox News Channel and Stars & Stripes were permitted into the briefing room, but Hegseth did not call on them. Instead, he took questions from NewsNation and Trump-friendly outlets like the Daily Caller, Daily Wire, One America News and the Christian Broadcasting Network. Most mainstream news outlets left their regular stations at the Pentagon last fall rather than agree to Hegseth’s rules restricting their work.
Hegseth denounced the “foolishness” of people wanting to know details of the operation in advance, such as whether Americans would commit to more than air power, and said the operation would continue as long as it took to achieve objections. He initially ignored NBC News’ Courtney Kube when she called out a question: “President Trump put a four-week time limit on it. Are you saying he’s wrong?”
Later, Hegseth denounced Kube for asking “the typical NBC sort of gotcha-type question. President Trump has all the latitude in the world to talk about how long it might take — four weeks, two weeks, six weeks, it could move up, it could move back. We’re going to execute at his command the objectives he set out to achieve.”
Unlike Pentagon briefings in past administrations, reporters were given assigned seats, with the Trump-friendly outlets seated in front. Jennifer Griffin, Hegseth’s former colleague at Fox News Channel who left the Pentagon with other reporters after not accepting his new rules, was seated in the last row.