Saudi-backed Wafi Energy partners with Pakistan’s MG to launch motor oil range

MG JW Automobile and Saudi-backed Wafi officials participate in agreement signing ceremony in Lahore on February 21, 2026. (Wafi Energy)
Short Url
Updated 23 February 2026
Follow

Saudi-backed Wafi Energy partners with Pakistan’s MG to launch motor oil range

  • Deal expands Saudi-owned firm’s footprint in Pakistan’s lubricants market
  • Advanced synthetic oils to be distributed through nationwide fuel network

ISLAMABAD: MG JW Automobile Pakistan Pvt. Ltd. has signed a memorandum of understanding with Wafi Energy Pakistan Limited, a subsidiary of Saudi Arabia-based Wafi Energy Holding, to introduce MG Motor Oil in Pakistan, the company said in a statement this month.

The agreement marks another step in the expansion of Saudi private investment in Pakistan’s downstream energy and automotive servicing sectors, following Wafi Energy’s acquisition of Shell Pakistan last year.

“Introducing Advanced Synthetic Technology motor oils 0W-20 SP C5 and 5W-30 SP C3, engineered to meet the demands of modern engines,” the MG statement said.

The company added the products were aimed at “redefining engine performance and ensuring the highest standards of engine protection, efficiency, and reliability for customers.”

Wafi Energy Pakistan Limited, formerly Shell Pakistan Limited, operates one of the country’s largest fuel retail and lubricants networks. Shell plc divested its majority stake in 2024, after which the company was rebranded under Saudi ownership while continuing to market fuels and lubricants under the Shell brand.

The MG partnership allows the Saudi-owned firm to deepen its integration into Pakistan’s automotive after-sales market, leveraging its nationwide infrastructure to distribute synthetic motor oils tailored to modern vehicle engines.
 


Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says over 330 Afghan fighters killed in clashes

Updated 3 min 19 sec ago
Follow

Pakistan rules out talks with Afghanistan, says over 330 Afghan fighters killed in clashes

  • Clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistan’s airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend
  • US voices support for Pakistan, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar says they aim to make Pakistan safe

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until an end to “terrorism” emanating from the Afghan soil, officials said on Friday, following the killing of more than 330 Afghan fighters in cross-border clashes this week.

The latest clashes between the neighbors erupted after Pakistan’s airstrikes on Afghan territory last weekend triggered Afghan retaliatory attacks along the border on Thursday, escalating long‑simmering tensions over Pakistan’s claim that Afghanistan shelters Pakistani Taliban militants. Afghanistan denies this and argues Pakistan is deflecting blame for its own security failures.

Pakistani Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said they had killed 331 Afghan fighters, destroyed over 100 posts and targeted 37 military locations across Afghanistan. Afghan officials have said that more than 50 Pakistani soldiers have been killed and several Pakistan posts have been captured by their forces. None of the casualty figures or battlefield claims from either side could be independently verified.

Meanwhile, Mosharraf Zaidi, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s spokesperson for foreign media, ruled out any talks with Afghanistan until Kabul addresses the issue as the United States (US) expressed his support for what it called Pakistan’s “right to defend itself” against attacks from Afghanistan’s Taliban rulers.

“There won’t be any talks, there is nothing to talk about... Terrorism from Afghanistan has to end,” Zaidi told Pakistani state media, saying Islamabad would continue to target militant havens inside Afghanistan.

“Pakistan’s responsibility is to protect its citizens. If we know that there is a terrorist in point A and we know that there is a terrorist enabler at point A, we will find a weapon to land at point A and eliminate the threat.”

Zaidi said he didn’t expect Pakistan to deviate from this position and that the government had clearly conveyed what it was doing.

“We have clearly articulated what we are doing and what we plan on continuing to do and what it will take for us to stop doing what we are doing,” Zaidi said.

“And we will expect that both the international community and the regime in question, the Afghan Taliban, will come to their senses and will help reduce instability and disorder in this region.”

Pakistan is a major non-NATO ally of Washington, while the US considers the Afghan Taliban to be a “terrorist” group.

“The United States supports Pakistan’s right to defend itself against attacks from the Taliban, a Specially Designated Global Terrorist group,” Reuters quoted a State Department spokesperson as saying. US diplomat Allison Hooker said on X she spoke on Friday with Pakistan Foreign Secretary Amna Baloch.

The State Department spokesperson said Washington was aware of the escalation in tensions and “outbreak of fighting between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban,” adding the US was “saddened by the loss of life.”

“The Taliban have consistently failed to uphold their counterterrorism commitments,” the State Department said, adding that “terrorist groups use Afghanistan as a launching pad for their heinous attacks.”

Meanwhile, Afghan Taliban spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid called for talks to resolve the crisis.

“We have always emphasized peaceful resolution, and now too we want the issue to be resolved through dialogue,” he said on Friday afternoon.

Asked what Pakistan desired, Information Minister Tarar said: “Neutralizing the threat and ensuring that Pakistan is safe.”

“Because for us, we’ve been good neighbors, we’ve been very friendly neighbors, we’ve been very, very generous neighbors. Our generosity, unfortunately, has often been seen as our weakness,” he told state media.

“So the objective, aim is to neutralize the threat and make Pakistan safe.”

To a question about a ceasefire, Tarar said it was “too early” to comment on that as it was an evolving situation.