Attacks on West Bank civilians ‘deeply, deeply wrong,’ UK foreign minister tells UN Security Council

Israeli forces blow up a house in Beit Ummar village, north of the occupied West Bank city of Hebron. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 February 2026
Follow

Attacks on West Bank civilians ‘deeply, deeply wrong,’ UK foreign minister tells UN Security Council

  • Yvette Cooper also denounces expansion of Israeli settlements and settler violence as clear breaches of international law that undermine the prospects for peace
  • UN’s political affairs chief, Rosemary DiCarlo, describes current moment as ‘pivotal,’ warns the opportunity created by Gaza ceasefire is ‘neither assured nor indefinite’

NEW YORK CITY: The UK’s foreign minister, Yvette Cooper, on Tuesday condemned attacks against Palestinian civilians in the occupied West Bank as “deeply, deeply wrong.”

She also told the UN Security Council, which the UK is chairing this month, that the expansion of Israeli settlements and settler violence were clear breaches of international law, and undermine the prospects for peace.

“We are witnessing an all-time high of Israeli settlement expansion and settler violence, in flagrant breach of international law,” Cooper said during a ministerial-level meeting of the council to discuss the Middle East.

“Palestinian families and communities (are) driven from their homes (and) beaten while farming their own land, attacks that sow terror among civilians. This is deeply, deeply wrong.”

Speaking in her role as president of the council for February, Cooper said efforts to secure a lasting ceasefire in Gaza remain fragile, despite some progress that includes the release of hostages and the partial restoration of humanitarian access.

There have been violations of the ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas on both sides, she added; Hamas continues to attack Israeli forces, and more than 600 Palestinians have reported been killed by Israeli strikes since the truce began.

“Gaza must not get stuck in a no man’s land between peace and war,” Cooper said.

She outlined four priorities in efforts to advance phase two of the Gaza peace plan that was endorsed in November by UN Security Council Resolution 2803.

Firstly, the decommissioning of Hamas’ weapons and removal of the group from any future role in governing Gaza, alongside the strengthening of Palestinian security forces, the deployment of an international stabilization presence, and an Israeli withdrawal from the territory.

Secondly, support for the National Committee for the Administration of Gaza, followed by a transition to control of the territory by a reformed Palestinian Authority. Thirdly, urgent steps to halt destabilizing actions in the West Bank, including settlement expansions and financial pressure on the Palestinian Authority.

And fourthly, a major scaling up of humanitarian aid to address the catastrophic conditions in Gaza and prevent any restrictions from blocking delivery of life-saving assistance.

Cooper reaffirmed the UK’s support for a two-state solution to the conflict between Israelis and Palestinians, and said London would host a peace-building conference in March that brings together civil society leaders from both sides. Drawing on Britain’s past experience with conflict in Northern Ireland, she said peace requires engagement beyond governments alone.

Also addressing the Security Council, the UN’s political affairs chief, Rosemary DiCarlo, described the current moment as a “pivotal” one for the Middle East, warning that the opportunity created by the Gaza ceasefire agreement was “neither assured nor indefinite.”

She called for efforts to make concrete progress toward stabilization and recovery in Gaza, including the demilitarization of the strip and the decommissioning of weapons held by Hamas and other armed groups, alongside the establishment of security arrangements to enable transitional governance.

While noting there have been improvements in the delivery of aid since the ceasefire came into effect in October, DiCarlo said most of Gaza’s population remains displaced and living in harsh conditions, with an urgent need for shelter materials, medical equipment and other basic supplies.

Meanwhile the situation in the occupied West Bank was deteriorating rapidly, she said, citing large-scale Israeli operations, mass detentions, restrictions on movement, and the repeated displacement of Palestinian families, particularly in the north.

She warned of what she called “gradual, de facto annexation” as recent actions by Israeli authorities have expanded their control over land in the territory.

“All Israeli settlements in the occupied West Bank, including East Jerusalem, have no legal validity,” DiCarlo said. “They violate international law and UN resolutions.”


Trump: ‘Iran will be hit very hard!’

Updated 43 min 11 sec ago
Follow

Trump: ‘Iran will be hit very hard!’

  • US president says Iran is no longer the ‘Bully of the Middle East’ in his social media post

DORAL, Florida: US President Donald Trump has warned in a social media post that more Iran officials will be targets in war, saying: ‘Today Iran will be hit very hard!’

“Iran, which is being beat to HELL, has apologized and surrendered to its Middle East neighbors, and promised that it will not shoot at them anymore. This promise was only made because of the relentless U.S. and Israeli attack,” Trump also said.

The US leader in his post threatened to expand strikes to include new targets.

“Under serious consideration for complete destruction and certain death, because of Iran’s bad behavior, are areas and groups of people that were not considered for targeting up until this moment in time,” Trump posted on his Truth Social account.

Trump also said that Iran is no longer the “Bully of the Middle East” in his post.

President Masoud Pezeshkian earlier apologized for Iran’s attacks on regional countries, insisting that Tehran would halt them and suggesting they were caused by miscommunication in the ranks.

Pezeshkian said its temporary leadership council ‌had approved ‌the ​suspension ‌of ⁠attacks ​against neighboring ⁠countries unless an attack on Iran came ⁠from ‌those countries.