Syria’s anti-Daesh coalition role a ‘new chapter,’ US envoy says

President Ahmad Al-Sharaa and US Special Envoy for Syria Tom Barrack at a recent meeting. Barrack praised Syria's involvement in global efforts against Daesh. (Syrian Presidency/File)
Short Url
Updated 10 February 2026
Follow

Syria’s anti-Daesh coalition role a ‘new chapter,’ US envoy says

  • US Envoy Tom Barrack praises Syria’s first attendance at coalition meeting in Riyadh
  • Syrian government joined the military alliance against the extremists in November

LONDON: Syria’s involvement in the international coalition against Daesh extremists marks a “new chapter” in global security, the US envoy to the country said Tuesday.

Syria’s foreign and intelligence ministers joined a coalition meeting for the first time in Riyadh on Monday, three months after the country’s new rulers announced it had joined the group.

Daesh emerged out of the chaos of the Syrian civil war, seizing a vast tract of territory in the country’s east and across large areas of Iraq in 2014. 

The extremist group imposed brutal rule over the areas it controlled and plotted terrorist attacks around the world, before the US-led coalition helped defeat them.

President Ahmad Al-Sharaa, who led opposition forces to victory against Bashar Assad more than a year ago, has offered his support to global efforts to counter the group.

“Regional solutions, shared responsibility. Syria’s participation in the D-ISIS Coalition meeting in Riyadh marks a new chapter in collective security,” US Special Envoy for Syria Tom Barrack said in a post on X, using an acronym to refer to Daesh.

Syrian Foreign Minister Asaad Hassan Al-Shaibani described the meeting of the Small Group of the Global Coalition to Defeat Daesh as “constructive and fruitful,” adding that supporting Syria was a “shared responsibility to enhance security and stability.”

In a statement after the Saudi-hosted meeting, the coalition said it noted Syria’s intention to “assume national leadership of counter-Daesh efforts.” 


US presses missile issue as new Iran talks to open in Geneva

Updated 2 min 45 sec ago
Follow

US presses missile issue as new Iran talks to open in Geneva

  • New round of negotiations in Geneva comes after the US carried out a massive military build-up in the region
  • Iran’s president reiterates Tehran is not seeking nuclear weapons in line with policy

GENEVA: The United States and Iran are set to hold indirect talks in Switzerland on Thursday aiming to strike a deal to avert fresh conflict and bring an end to weeks of threats.
The new round of negotiations in Geneva comes after the US carried out a massive military build-up in the region and President Donald Trump repeatedly threatened to strike Iran if a deal is not reached.
In his State of the Union address on Tuesday, Trump accused Iran of “pursuing sinister nuclear ambitions.”
He also claimed Tehran had “already developed missiles that can threaten Europe and our bases overseas, and they’re working to build missiles that will soon reach the United States of America.”
The Iranian foreign ministry called these claims “big lies.”

Iran president says ahead of US talks not seeking nuclear weapon ‘at all’

TEHRAN: Iran’s President Masoud Pezeshkian reiterated on Thursday that Tehran was not seeking nuclear weapons in line with the policy set by the country’s supreme leader.

“Our Supreme Leader has already stated that we will not have nuclear weapons at all,” Pezeshkian said in a speech.

“Even if I wanted to move in that direction, I could not — from a doctrinal standpoint, I would not be permitted.” — AFP


The maximum range of Iran’s missiles is 2,000 kilometers according to what Tehran has publicly disclosed. However the US Congressional Research Service estimates they top out at about 3,000 kilometers — less than a third of the distance to the continental United States.
The dispute between the countries mostly revolves around Iran’s nuclear program, which the West believes is aimed at building an atomic bomb but Tehran insists is peaceful.
However the US has also been pushing to discuss Iran’s ballistic missile program, as well as Tehran’s support for armed groups hostile toward Israel.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio warned that Iran must also negotiate on its missile program, calling Tehran’s refusal to discuss ballistic weapons “a big, big problem” on the eve of the talks.
He followed up by saying “the president wants diplomatic solutions.”
Iran has taken anything beyond the nuclear issue off the negotiating table and has demanded that the US sanctions crippling its economy be part of any agreement.
‘Neither war nor peace’
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian said on Wednesday he had a “favorable outlook for the negotiations” that could finally “move beyond this ‘neither war nor peace’ situation.”
Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, who is leading the Iranian delegation at the talks, has called them “a historic opportunity,” adding that a deal was “within reach.”
In a foreign ministry statement that followed a meeting with his Oman counterpart, Araghchi said the success of the US negotiations depend “on the seriousness of the other side and its avoidance of contradictory behavior and positions.”
The US will be represented by envoy Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner, who is married to Trump’s daughter Ivanka.
The two countries held talks earlier this month in Oman, which is mediating the negotiations, then gathered for a second round in Geneva last week.
A previous attempt at negotiations collapsed when Israel launched surprise strikes on Iran last June, beginning a 12-day war that Washington briefly joined to bomb Iranian nuclear sites.
In January, fresh tensions between the US and Iran emerged after Tehran engaged in a bloody crackdown on widespread protests that have posed one of the greatest challenges to the Islamic republic since its inception.
Trump has threatened several times to intervene to “help” the Iranian people.
Emile Hokayem, senior fellow for Middle East security at the International Institute for Strategic Studies, said that “the region seems to expect a war at this point.”
In January, there was “a big push by a number of Middle Eastern states to convince the US not to” strike Iran.
“But there’s a lot of apprehension at this point, because the expectation is that this time” a war would be “bigger” than the one in June.
Tehran residents who spoke to AFP were divided as to whether there would be renewed conflict.
Homemaker Tayebeh noted that Trump had “said that war would be very bad for Iran.”
“There would be famine and people would suffer a lot. People are suffering now, but at least with war, our fate might be clear,” the 60-year-old said.