Oxford exhibition explores Islam’s sacred journey through contemporary art

‘The Ultimate Journey’ brings together 36 artists from Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Indonesia, Australia, the UK and beyond. (Screengrab / Layan Culture)
Short Url
Updated 05 February 2026
Follow

Oxford exhibition explores Islam’s sacred journey through contemporary art

OXFORD, UK: The Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies has launched a landmark exhibition titled “The Ultimate Journey,” inviting visitors to reflect on Islam’s holiest sites and their enduring legacy.

Launched in collaboration with the Saudi-based Layan Cultural Foundation, the Oxford presentation is the latest iteration of the exhibition, which has previously been shown in other formats and venues internationally.

The exhibition also marks the 40th anniversary of the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies as well as just over 20 years since Makkah was designated the first capital of Islamic culture by the Islamic Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization in 2005.

“The Ultimate Journey” brings together 36 artists from Saudi Arabia, Lebanon, Indonesia, Australia, the UK and beyond.

Their works span different styles and techniques — from calligraphy to abstract art — ultimately representing and honoring Islam’s three sacred sites: the Grand Mosque in Makkah, the Prophet’s Mosque in Madinah and the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem.

The collection includes works by both Muslim and non-Muslim artists including Dia Aziz Dia, Peter Gould, Nassar Mansour, Ahmed Mater, Bill West, Abdullah Al-Shalti and Reem Nazir.

 

“The idea was simple but deeply personal,” Ghada Al-Tobaishi, managing director of the Layan Cultural Foundation, told Arab News. “Artists from around the world were asked one question: How do you feel about the three holy mosques? They were invited to translate faith, memory and pilgrimage into their own visual language.”

Founded in 1985, the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies was established to promote the multidisciplinary academic study of Islam and contemporary Muslim societies. Its founder and director, Dr. Farhan Ahmad Nizami, said cultural engagement has always been central to the center’s mission.

“From day one, the study of art, culture and civilization was very much part of the center’s remit,” Nizami told Arab News. “Inter-civilizational understanding rests on sound academic engagement with history, culture and people, and from that emerges a more accurate understanding of the Muslim world.”

Nizami said that presenting Islam’s holy sites through contemporary art enables audiences — Muslim and non-Muslim alike — to engage with their spiritual significance beyond text or ritual.

The exhibition is drawn from a growing collection developed by Layan Culture, a not-for-profit cultural institution founded in 2007 by Prince Faisal bin Abdullah bin Mohammad Al-Saud.

Describing itself as a “custodian of cultural legacy,” the foundation preserves Islamic heritage through research, knowledge gathering and public exhibitions, showcasing the transformative power of the arts.

The institution is dedicated to safeguarding Saudi Arabian heritage, Islamic arts and Arab culture through curated collections, educational publications and cultural initiatives.

Exhibition consultant and catalogue producer Richard Wilding said the exhibition’s works explore not only religious devotion, but also the historical and human dimensions of the sacred cities. “Makkah, Madinah and Jerusalem are holy spaces, but they are also ancient cities,” he said. “You see pilgrims, historic settings and personal moments — artists responding emotionally to places that carry deep meaning.”

Wilding, who is non-Muslim and has worked extensively in Saudi Arabia, added that the exhibition speaks to broad audiences. “You don’t have to be Muslim to respect or revere these places,” he said. “This exhibition offers an opportunity — especially for UK audiences — to encounter these sacred cities through art, sometimes for the first time.”

The exhibition also honors Prince Khalid Al-Faisal, governor of the Makkah Region, Oxford alumnus, poet and artist, whose vision has long championed the intersection of culture, faith and artistic expression.

Housed within the Oxford Centre for Islamic Studies’ purpose-built home, which blends classical Islamic architecture with traditional Oxford design, “The Ultimate Journey” positions art as a bridge between scholarship and spirituality, history and lived experience.

It welcomes visitors to reconsider the contemporary significance and enduring legacy of Islam’s most sacred spaces.


House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

House votes to slap back Trump’s tariffs on Canada in rare bipartisan rebuke

WASHINGTON: The House voted Wednesday to slap back President Donald Trump’s tariffs on Canada, a rare if largely symbolic rebuke of the White House agenda as Republicans joined Democrats over the objections of GOP leadership.
The tally, 219-211, was among the first times the House, controlled by Republicans, has confronted the president over a signature policy, and drew instant recrimination from Trump himself. The resolution seeks to end the national emergency Trump declared to impose the tariffs, though actually undoing the policy would require support from the president, which is highly unlikely. It next goes to the Senate.
Trump believes in the power of tariffs to force US trade partners to the negotiating table. But lawmakers are facing unrest back home from businesses caught in the trade wars and constituents navigating pocketbook issues and high prices.
“Today’s vote is simple, very simple: Will you vote to lower the cost of living for the American family or will you keep prices high out of loyalty to one person — Donald J. Trump?” said Rep. Gregory Meeks of New York, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, who authored the resolution.
Within minutes, as the gavel struck, Trump fired off a stern warning to those in the Republican Party who would dare to cross him.
“Any Republican, in the House or the Senate, that votes against TARIFFS will seriously suffer the consequences come Election time, and that includes Primaries!” the president posted on social media.
The high-stakes moment provides a snapshot of the House’s unease with the president’s direction, especially ahead of the midterm elections as economic issues resonate among voters. The Senate has already voted to reject Trump’s tariffs on Canada and other countries in a show of displeasure. But both chambers would have to approve the tariff rollbacks, and send the resolution to Trump for the president’s signature — or veto.
Six House Republicans voted for the resolution, and one Democrat voted against it.
From Canada, Ontario, Premier Doug Ford on social media called the vote “an important victory with more work ahead.” He thanked lawmakers from both parties “who stood up in support of free trade and economic growth between our two great countries. Let’s end the tariffs and together build a more prosperous and secure future.”
Trump recently threatened to impose a 100 percent tariff on goods imported from Canada over that country’s proposed China trade deal, intensifying a feud with the longtime US ally and Prime Minister Mark Carney.
GOP defections forced the vote
House Speaker Mike Johnson tried to prevent this showdown.
Johnson insisted lawmakers wait for a pending Supreme Court ruling in a lawsuit about the tariffs. He engineered a complicated rules change to prevent floor action. But Johnson’s strategy collapsed late Tuesday, as Republicans peeled off during a procedural vote to ensure the Democratic measure was able to advance.
“The president’s trade policies have been of great benefit,” Johnson, R-Louisiana, had said. “And I think the sentiment is that we allow a little more runway for this to be worked out between the executive branch and the judicial branch.”
Late Tuesday evening, Johnson could be seen speaking to holdout Republican lawmakers as the GOP leadership team struggled to shore up support during a lengthy procedural vote, but the numbers lined up against him.
“We’re disappointed,” Kevin Hassett, the director of the White House’s National Economic Council, told reporters at the White House on Wednesday morning. “The president will make sure they don’t repeal his tariffs.”
Terminating Trump’s emergency
The resolution put forward by Meeks would terminate the national emergency that Trump declared a year ago as one of his executive orders.
The administration claimed illicit drug flow from Canada constitutes an unusual and extraordinary threat that allows the president to slap tariffs on imported goods outside the terms of the US-Mexico-Canada trade agreement.
The Republican chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Rep. Brian Mast of Florida, said the flow of fentanyl into the US is a dire national emergency and the policy must be left in place.
“Let’s be clear again about what this resolution is and what it’s not. It’s not a debate about tariffs. You can talk about those, but that’s not really what it is,” Mast said. “This is Democrats trying to ignore that there is a fentanyl crisis.”
Experts say fentanyl produced by cartels in Mexico is largely smuggled into the US from land crossings in California and Arizona. Fentanyl is also made in Canada and smuggled into the US, but to a much lesser extent.
Torn between Trump and tariffs
Ahead of voting, some rank-and-file Republican lawmakers expressed unease over the choices ahead as Democrats — and a few renegade Republicans — impressed on their colleagues the need to flex their power as the legislative branch rather than ceding so much power to the president to take authority over trade and tariff policy.
Rep. Don Bacon, R-Nebraska, said he was unpersuaded by Johnson’s call to wait until the Supreme Court makes its decision about the legality of Trump’s tariffs. He voted for passage.
“Why doesn’t the Congress stand on its own two feet and say that we’re an independent branch?” Bacon said. “We should defend our authorities. I hope the Supreme Court does, but if we don’t do it, shame on us.”
Bacon, who is retiring rather than facing reelection, also argued that tariffs are bad economic policy.
Other Republicans had to swiftly make up their minds after Johnson’s gambit — which would have paused the calendar days to prevent the measure from coming forward — was turned back.
“At the end of the day, we’re going to have to support our president,” said Rep. Keith Self, R-Texas.
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., said he doesn’t want to tie the president’s hands on trade and would support the tariffs on Canada “at this time.”