Wary EU leaders seek to preserve transatlantic ties after a week of Trump threats

European Council President Antonio Costa. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 23 January 2026
Follow

Wary EU leaders seek to preserve transatlantic ties after a week of Trump threats

BRUSSELS: European Union leaders on Thursday welcomed US President Donald Trump’s decision to drop his tariff threats over Greenland but expressed reservations about getting involved in his Board of Peace project.
After chairing an emergency summit called to reassess troubled ties with the Trump administration, EU Council President António Costa underlined that the leaders believe “it’s very important to preserve and cherish our transatlantic partnership.”
Striking a measured tone after days of high rhetoric over Trump’s threats to annex Greenland, Costa said the priority must now be to put in place the EU-US trade deal agreed last July. “The goal remains the effective stability of the trade relations,” he told reporters.
That said, Costa did affirm that the 27-nation trading bloc “will continue to stand up for its interests and will defend itself, its member states, its citizens and its companies against any form of coercion.”
His remarks contrasted sharply with the more aggressive stance of French President Emmanuel Macron.
“Europe can make itself be respected, and that’s a very good thing,” Macron told reporters, as he arrived for the meeting in Brussels. “When we use the tools that we have at our disposal we get respect and that’s what happened this week.”
On the eve of the EU meeting, Trump had dramatically backed away from his insistence on “acquiring” Greenland, a semiautonomous territory of Denmark. For the first time, he said that he would not use force to seize the island. Trump also dropped his threat of slapping tariffs on European nations that support Denmark.
Yet nothing suggests that the unpredictable US leader won’t change his mind again.
Trump’s threats force a rethink

Before backing down, Trump had urged Denmark and the rest of NATO to stand aside and let him have Greenland, adding an ominous warning: “You can say yes, and we will be very appreciative. Or you can say no, and we will remember.”
Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk underlined that “the United States are absolutely the most important partner when it comes to our security.” But Tusk said that it’s important “to understand the difference between domination and leadership. Leadership is okay.”
No details of the hastily agreed “framework” deal that sparked Trump’s extraordinary reversal have been made public, and doubts about it persist. Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen insists that her country will not bargain over its sovereignty.
“We are sovereign state and we cannot negotiate about that, because it’s a part of the very basic democratic values. But of course, we can discuss with us how we can strengthen our common cooperation on security in the Arctic region,” she told reporters.
Frederiksen called for “a permanent presence from NATO in the Arctic region, including around Greenland.” Macron said that French troops would take part in military exercises that NATO is organizing.
Asked on Thursday whether NATO is planning a future operation to improve security in the Arctic, the alliance’s top military officer, US Lt. Gen Alexus Grynkewich said: “We’ve done no planning yet. We have not received political guidance to move out.”
European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen emphasized the need to build the EU’s ties with Greenland. She said her team “will soon put forward a substantive package of investments,” without elaborating.
Board of Peace doubts
The leaders were less keen on Trump’s proposed “Board of Peace,” which was initially envisioned as a small group of world leaders overseeing the Gaza ceasefire but has grown into something far more ambitious. Trump has spoken about the board replacing some of the functions of the United Nations.
Some European countries have declined invitations to join. Norway, Slovenia and Sweden said they won’t take part. Told that Macron was unlikely to take up the offer, Trump said: “I’ll put a 200 percent tariff on his wines and champagnes and he’ll join.”
Germany has offered a guarded and noncommittal response to Trump’s invitation, but Hungary and Bulgaria accepted.
We are ready to work together with the United States on the implementation of the Comprehensive Peace Plan for Gaza, with a Board of Peace carrying out its mission as a transitional administration in accordance with the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2803.
Costa said the majority of the leaders “have serious doubts about a number of elements in the charter of the Board of Peace related to its scope, its governance and its compatibility with the UN Charter.”
Europe’s prime security concern
As the leaders converged on Brussels, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky blasted his European allies for what he portrayed as their slow, fragmented and inadequate response to Russia’s invasion nearly four years ago and its continued international aggression.
At the World Economic Forum in Switzerland, Zelensky listed a litany of grievances and criticisms of Europe that he said have left Ukraine at the mercy of Russian President Vladimir Putin amid an ongoing US push to end the war.
“Europe looks lost,” he said, and he urged the continent to become a global force. Shining a light on Europe’s dependence on America, he contrasted its response with Washington’s bold steps in Venezuela and Iran.
Von der Leyen pointed out that the EU has spent more 193 billion euros  on Ukraine over four years of war, and that the bloc intends to provide a further 90 billion euros  over the next two years to help meet most of its economic and military needs.
“We know that we will never match the sacrifice of the Ukrainian people, but what we can do is stand by their side. And I think the figures speak for themselves,” she said.


Pushed to margins, women vanish from Bangladesh’s political arena

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Pushed to margins, women vanish from Bangladesh’s political arena

DHAKA: For more than three decades, Bangladesh was one of the few countries in the world to be led by women, yet there are almost none on the February 12 ballots.
Despite helping to spearhead the uprising that led to this vote, women are poised to be largely excluded from the South Asian country’s political arena.
Regardless of which parties win next week, the outcome will see Bangladesh governed almost exclusively by men.
“I used to be proud that even though my country is not the most liberal, we still had two women figureheads at the top,” first-time voter Ariana Rahman, 20. told AFP.
“Whoever won, the prime minister would be a woman.”
Women make up less than four percent of the candidates for this election: just 76 among the 1,981 contestants vying for 300 parliamentary seats.
And most of the parties put only men on their tickets.
Women’s political representation has always been limited in the conservative South Asian nation. Since independence, the highest number elected was 22 in 2018.
But from 1991 until the 2024 revolution, Bangladesh was helmed, represented abroad and politically defined by two women: Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia.
Zia died in December after leading the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) for four decades and serving three terms as premier.
Hasina, the five-time prime minister overthrown in the July 2024 uprising, is hiding in India and sentenced to death in absentia for crimes against humanity.

- ‘Censored, vilified, judged’ -

Many rights campaigners had hoped the revolution that ended Hasina’s autocratic rule would usher in a period of greater equality, including for women.
While the caretaker government of Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus set up a Women’s Affairs Reform Commission, his interim administration has also been criticized for sidelining the body and making unilateral decisions without consulting women officials.
And there has been a surge of open support for Islamist groups, which want to limit women’s participation in public life.
After years of being suppressed, emboldened hard-liners have demanded organizers of religious commemorations and other public events remove women from the line-up, as well as calling for restrictions on activities like women’s football matches.
“Historically, women’s participation has always been low in our country, but there was an expectation for change after the uprising, which never happened,” said Mahrukh Mohiuddin, the spokesperson for women’s political rights organization Narir Rajnoitik Odhikar Forum (Women’s Political Rights Forum).
An entrenched patriarchal mindset means women are often relegated to household duties, she added.
Those who dare to speak out often face hostility.
“Women are censored, vilified... judged for simply being part of a political party,” said uprising leader Umama Fatema. “That is the reality.”
Even the group formed by student leaders of the revolution, the National Citizen Party (NCP), is fielding just two women among its 30 candidates.
“I don’t take part in any decision?making of my party, (and) the biggest and most important decisions are not taken in our presence,” said NCP member Samantha Sharmeen.
The NCP has allied with Jamaat-e-Islami, the largest Islamist party and one of 30 parties to have failed to nominate a single woman.

- ‘Can’t be any women leaders’ -

Jamaat’s assistant secretary general, Ahsanul Mahboob Zubair, said society was not yet “ready and safe” for women in politics.
Nurunnesa Siddiqa of its women’s wing added: “In an Islamic organization, there can’t be any women leaders, we have accepted that.”
One of the few women running in this election, Manisha Chakraborty, said women’s participation in Bangladesh’s politics has long been limited to tokenization.
The nation of 170 million people directly elects 300 lawmakers to its parliament, while another 50 are selected on a separate women’s list.
“The concept of reserved seats is insulting,” said Chakraborty, whose Bangladesh Socialist Party has nominated 10 women among it 29 candidates — the highest share in this poll.
“Lobbying, internal preference, nepotism — all play a role in making women’s participation in parliament just a formality,” she told AFP.
Former minister Abdul Moyeen Khan said the reserved seats “were meant to help women establish a foothold,” but “the opposite happened.”
Selima Rahman, the only woman on the BNP’s standing committee, said promising women leaders often “fade away” due to a lack of party support.
And while Zia and Hasina served important symbolic roles, she pointed to how both had been elevated to the pinnacle of power through family connections.
Student voter Ariana Rahman fears a long struggle lies ahead.
“More women in this election would have made me feel better represented,” she said. “The next few years are likely to be more hostile toward women.”