Israeli strike kills 3 journalists in Gaza, as media watchdog reports near-record number in jail

Mourners carry the body of one of the Palestinian journalists killed in an Israeli airstrike, Khan Younis, southern Gaza Strip, Jan. 21, 2026. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 21 January 2026
Follow

Israeli strike kills 3 journalists in Gaza, as media watchdog reports near-record number in jail

  • Mohammed Salah Qashta, Abdul Raouf Shaat and Anas Ghneim were using a drone camera to document aid distribution when a vehicle was targeted
  • Deaths coincide with publication of a Committee to Protect Journalists report that reveals 330 journalists are imprisoned worldwide

LONDON: An Israeli airstrike killed three journalists in Gaza on Wednesday, the territory’s civil defense agency said. Their deaths came as a report revealed the number of journalists imprisoned worldwide remains close to a record high.

The agency said the bodies of Mohammed Salah Qashta, Abdul Raouf Shaat and Anas Ghneim were taken to Al-Aqsa Martyrs Hospital in Deir Al-Balah following the airstrike in Al-Zahra, southwest of Gaza City.

Shaat had regularly contributed photographs and video footage to Agence France-Presse, though he was not on assignment at the time, the news agency said.

The Israeli military said its troops had identified “several suspects who operated a drone affiliated with Hamas” in central Gaza and attacked them because of the threat they posed. The details were under review, it added.

An eyewitness said the journalists were using a drone to document the distribution of aid by the Egyptian Relief Committee in the Gaza Strip when a strike hit one of the committee’s vehicles.

“A vehicle belonging to the Egyptian Committee was targeted during a humanitarian mission, resulting in the martyrdom of three individuals,” said Mohammed Mansour, a spokesperson for the organization.

All vehicles belonging to the committee bear its logo, he added, and he accused Israeli soldiers of “criminally” targeting the vehicle.

Meanwhile, a newly published report by the Committee to Protect Journalists stated that as of Dec. 1, 2025, 330 journalists were imprisoned worldwide, down from a record 384 at the end of 2024 but still close to historic highs.

Israel, which is holding 29 journalists, all of them Palestinians, ranked third on the list of countries with the most detained media workers, after China (50) and Myanmar (30). Nearly one in five jailed journalists reported they had been subjected to torture or beatings.

“Autocracies and democracies alike are locking up journalists to quash dissent and stifle independent reporting,” the committee’s CEO, Jodie Ginsberg, said.

The Hamas-run health ministry in Gaza said Israeli forces had killed at least 466 Palestinians since the ceasefire agreement took effect in November. The Committee to Protect Journalists reported that 127 journalists and other media workers were killed in the course of their work during 2025, the vast majority of them in Gaza.

* With agencies


EU warns Meta it must open up WhatsApp to rival AI chatbots

Updated 09 February 2026
Follow

EU warns Meta it must open up WhatsApp to rival AI chatbots

  • The EU executive on Monday told Meta to give rival chatbots access to WhatsApp after an antitrust probe found the US giant to be in breach of the bloc’s competition rules

BRUSSELS: The EU executive on Monday told Meta to give rival chatbots access to WhatsApp after an antitrust probe found the US giant to be in breach of the bloc’s competition rules.
The European Commission said a change in Meta’s terms had “effectively” barred third-party artificial intelligence assistants from connecting to customers via the messaging platform since January.
Competition chief Teresa Ribera said the EU was “considering quickly imposing interim measures on Meta, to preserve access for competitors to WhatsApp while the investigation is ongoing, and avoid Meta’s new policy irreparably harming competition in Europe.”
The EU executive, which is in charge of competition policy, sent Meta a warning known as a “statement of objections,” a formal step in antitrust probes.
Meta now has a chance to reply and defend itself. Monday’s step does not prejudge the outcome of the probe, the commission said.
The tech giant rejected the commission’s preliminary findings.
“The facts are that there is no reason for the EU to intervene,” a Meta spokesperson said.
“There are many AI options and people can use them from app stores, operating systems, devices, websites, and industry partnerships. The commission’s logic incorrectly assumes the WhatsApp Business API is a key distribution channel for these chatbots,” the spokesperson said.
Opened in December, the EU probe marks the latest attempt by the 27-nation bloc to rein in Big Tech, many of whom are based in the United States, in the face of strong pushback by the government of US President Donald Trump.
- Meta in the firing line -
The investigation covers the European Economic Area (EEA), made up of the bloc’s 27 states, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway — with the exception of Italy, which opened a separate investigation into Meta in July.
The commission said that Meta is “likely to be dominant” in the EEA for consumer messaging apps, notably through WhatsApp, and accused Meta of “abusing this dominant position by refusing access” to competitors.
“We cannot allow dominant tech companies to illegally leverage their dominance to give themselves an unfair advantage,” Ribera said in a statement.
There is no legal deadline for concluding an antitrust probe.
Meta is already under investigation under different laws in the European Union.
EU regulators are also investigating its platforms Facebook and Instagram over fears they are not doing enough to tackle the risk of social media addiction for children.
The company also appealed a 200-million-euro fine imposed last year by the commission under the online competition law, the Digital Markets Act.
That case focused on its policy asking users to choose between an ad-free subscription and a free, ad-supported service, and Brussels and Meta remain in discussions over finding an alternative that would address the EU’s concerns.