Rights groups refer killing of Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza to ICC

The announcement came as US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce declined to condemn Israel over the incident, telling reporters: “We refer you to Israel for information regarding Al-Sharif.” (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 13 August 2025
Follow

Rights groups refer killing of Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza to ICC

  • Hind Rajab Foundation and Palestinian Center for Human Rights said they have filed the case to ICC
  • Killing of 6 journalists shows ‘a pattern of premeditation and deliberate targeting’

LONDON: Two Palestinian rights organizations have filed a case with the International Criminal Court over the killing of six Al Jazeera journalists in an Israeli strike on Gaza City.
In a joint statement on Tuesday, the Hind Rajab Foundation and the Palestinian Center for Human Rights called the attack “a clear-cut criminal act — a war crime and part of a broader genocidal campaign — and it demanded a direct, targeted legal response.”
The groups said the strike was part of “a long war on the press” by Israel, which used “recycled accusations” that the victims were “terrorists in press vests.”
The attack on Sunday destroyed the team’s tent, killing leading correspondent Anas Al-Sharif, correspondent Mohammed Qreiqeh, cameraman Ibrahim Zaher and driver-cameraman Mohammed Noufal. Al Jazeera initially reported five of its staff had been killed but later revised the figure to four.
Three others also died in the strike: Freelance cameraman Moamen Aliwa, freelance journalist Mohammed Al-Khaldi and Saad Jundiya, a civilian who was at the scene.
The Israel Defense Forces later confirmed the targeting was deliberate, accusing Al-Sharif of leading a Hamas cell and taking part in the Oct. 7 attacks. The allegations followed weeks of public vilification of Al-Sharif by Israeli officials, which had already raised fears for his safety.

The allegations have been rejected by rights groups, Al-Sharif’s colleagues, the UN, European and Arab governments, and Al Jazeera’s Qatari parent network, which accused Israel of systematically targeting its journalists to block coverage from Gaza.
“The killings of Anas Al-Sharif and his colleagues are not isolated incidents,” HRF and PCHR said. “Investigations reveal a systematic policy targeting Al Jazeera journalists.”
The Article 15 communication filed with the ICC focuses on both the operational chain of command that led to Al-Sharif’s killing — HRF’s contribution — and the documented cases of other slain Al Jazeera journalists in Gaza — PCHR’s contribution — which the groups say show “a pattern of premeditation and deliberate targeting.”
The group said it filed the complaint against Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir, IDF chief of the General Staff; Maj. Gen. Tomer Bar, commander of the Israeli Air Force; Maj. Gen. Yaniv Asor, Southern Command commander; Brig. Gen. Yossi Sariel, former commander of Unit 8200 (Israel’s signals intelligence branch); General A., current commander of Unit 8200; the commander of Palmachim Airbase (name undisclosed); the commander of the “Black Snake” Squadron (name undisclosed); and Col. Avichay Adraee of the IDF Spokesperson’s Unit, Arab Media Division, who has been accused of leading a sustained smear campaign against Al-Sharif.
“The evidence is there. The legal foundation is unshakable. The jurisdiction is established beyond question,” the statement said. “What remains is for the International Criminal Court to move past statements of ‘grave concern’ and take the decisive step that justice demands: act.”
The announcement came as US State Department spokeswoman Tammy Bruce declined to condemn Israel over the incident, telling reporters: “We refer you to Israel for information regarding Al-Sharif.”
Bruce expressed respect for journalists in war zones but echoed Israel’s allegations — made without evidence — that Hamas fighters have posed as reporters. “It is a horrible thing to do for those of you committed to finding information to be in that situation,” she said.


BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

Updated 16 December 2025
Follow

BBC says will fight Trump's $10 bn defamation lawsuit

LONDON: The BBC said Tuesday it would fight a $10-billion lawsuit brought by US President Donald Trump against the British broadcaster over a documentary that edited his 2021 speech ahead of the US Capitol riot.
“As we have made clear previously, we will be defending this case,” a BBC spokesperson said in a statement sent to AFP, adding the company would not be making “further comment on ongoing legal proceedings.”
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Miami, seeks “damages in an amount not less than $5,000,000,000” for each of two counts against the British broadcaster, for alleged defamation and violation of the Florida Deceptive and Unfair Trade Practices Act.
The video that triggered the lawsuit spliced together two separate sections of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021 in a way that made it appear he explicitly urged supporters to attack the Capitol, where lawmakers were certifying Joe Biden’s 2020 election win.
The lawsuit comes as the UK government on Tuesday launched the politically sensitive review of the BBC’s Royal Charter, which outlines the corporation’s funding and governance and needs to be renewed in 2027.
As part of the review, it launched a public consultation on issues including the role of “accuracy” in the BBC’s mission and contentious reforms to the corporation’s funding model, which currently relies on a mandatory fee for anyone in the country who watches television.
Minister Stephen Kinnock stressed after the lawsuit was filed that the UK government “is a massive supporter of the BBC.”
The BBC has “been very clear that there is no case to answer in terms of Mr.Trump’s accusation on the broader point of libel or defamation. I think it’s right the BBC stands firm on that point,” Kinnock told Sky News on Tuesday.
Trump, 79, had said the lawsuit was imminent, claiming the BBC had “put words in my mouth,” even positing that “they used AI or something.”
The documentary at issue aired last year before the 2024 election, on the BBC’s “Panorama” flagship current affairs program.

Apology letter 

“The formerly respected and now disgraced BBC defamed President Trump by intentionally, maliciously, and deceptively doctoring his speech in a brazen attempt to interfere in the 2024 Presidential Election,” a spokesperson for Trump’s legal team said in a statement to AFP.
“The BBC has a long pattern of deceiving its audience in coverage of President Trump, all in service of its own leftist political agenda,” the statement added.
The British Broadcasting Corporation, whose audience extends well beyond the United Kingdom, faced a period of turmoil last month after a media report brought renewed attention to the edited clip.
The scandal led the BBC director general, Tim Davie, and the organization’s top news executive, Deborah Turness, to resign.
Trump’s lawsuit says the edited speech in the documentary was “fabricated and aired by the Defendants one week before the 2024 Presidential Election in a brazen attempt to interfere in and influence the Election’s outcome to President Trump’s detriment.”
The BBC has denied Trump’s claims of legal defamation, though BBC chairman Samir Shah has sent Trump a letter of apology.
Shah also told a UK parliamentary committee last month the broadcaster should have acted sooner to acknowledge its mistake after the error was disclosed in a memo, which was leaked to The Daily Telegraph newspaper.
The BBC lawsuit is the latest in a string of legal actions Trump has taken against media companies in recent years, several of which have led to multi-million-dollar settlements.