UK proposal to revisit Israel arms license suspension ‘appalling’: Civil society groups

The UK government’s overtures toward unblocking arms licenses to Israel have been condemned by five major civil society groups. (AFP/File Photo)
Short Url
Updated 17 January 2026
Follow

UK proposal to revisit Israel arms license suspension ‘appalling’: Civil society groups

  • Israel’s continued killing of Palestinians in both Gaza and the West Bank demonstrates a total disregard for peace, and a continuation of the genocide of the Palestinian people
  • ‘A continuation of the status quo is insufficient, but a revocation of its current policies is altogether unconscionable’
  • ‘It also risks demonstrating the UK’s weak commitment to upholding international law’

LONDON: The UK government’s overtures toward unblocking arms licenses to Israel have been condemned by five major civil society groups.

Amid outrage over the war on Gaza, the government suspended about 30 of 350 arms licenses to Israel in September 2024.

Components for the F-35 jet used by the Israeli Air Force were exempt from the partial suspension, despite the aircraft being used extensively to target civilian areas of Gaza.

In July 2024, three 2,000-pound bombs were dropped by F-35s on an area in Khan Younis that Israel had declared a “safe zone,” killing 90 Palestinians.

Peter Kyle, the government’s business and trade secretary, has now committed to revisiting UK-Israel trade relations and the partial pause on arms export licenses. Kyle told the London-based Jewish Chronicle that the two issues are “intrinsically linked.”

In response, the Campaign Against Arms Trade, Global Justice Now, the Global Legal Action Network, the International Centre of Justice for Palestinians and War on Want condemned the proposal as “appalling.”

On top of previous moves ostensibly aimed at curtailing Israeli aggression in Gaza, the UK government also suspended talks on a new trade deal last May but failed to suspend the existing trade agreement.

The five leading civil society organizations said in a joint statement: “Peter Kyle said that he wants to see movement towards a ‘sustainable peace’ in order for these measures to be considered. This position is completely divorced from reality.

“Israel’s continued killing of Palestinians in both Gaza and the West Bank demonstrates a total disregard for peace, and a continuation of the genocide of the Palestinian people.

“Furthermore, Israel has concentrated the population of Gaza into an area beyond the Yellow Line, constituting only 42 percent of the Gaza Strip, and continues to expand this area.”

The five organizations also highlighted Israel’s demolition of Palestinian homes in its “zone of control” in Gaza, in an attempt to “ensure that life continues to be unlivable” in the war-torn enclave.

There has been “little or no improvement” in the factors cited by the UK government for the initial arms export suspensions, the statement said.

“In fact, it is not even the case that there has been no substantive change. Rather, Israel has actively introduced new disruptions to aid distribution in Gaza, including its revocation of the licenses of 37 international non-governmental organisations working on aid provision in Gaza and the West Bank,” it added.

The UK government must continue to suspend the 30 licenses, but also the remaining 320, and cancel the existing free trade agreement with Israel, the five groups said.

“A continuation of the status quo is insufficient, but a revocation of its current policies is altogether unconscionable,” they added.

“It not only fails to hold Israel to account for its genocide of the Palestinian people, but it also risks demonstrating the UK’s weak commitment to upholding international law, already revealed through its continued supply of arms and business-as-usual approach to arms and economic trade with Israel, which has been damaged significantly in recent years by the UK’s continued support of Israel, despite its continued crimes against the Palestinian people.”


India’s wealthy embrace a new luxury symbol: water

Updated 2 sec ago
Follow

India’s wealthy embrace a new luxury symbol: water

  • Tap water in India is not fit for human consumption
  • Wealthy opt for premium water as wellness craze boosts industry
NEW DELHI: At an Indian gourmet food store, Avanti Mehta is organizing a blind tasting of drinks sourced from France, Italy and India. No, ​this isn’t wine, it’s water.
Participants use tiny shot glasses to check the minerality, carbonation and salinity in samples of Evian from the French Alps, Perrier from southern France, San Pellegrino from Italy and India’s Aava from the foothills of the Aravalli mountains.
“They will all taste different ... you should be choosing a water that can give you some sort of nutritional value,” said Mehta, who is 32 and calls herself India’s youngest water sommelier, a term usually associated with premium wine. Her family owns the Aava mineral water brand. Premium water is a $400 million business in the world’s most populous nation and is growing bigger as its wealthy see it as a new status symbol that fits in with a spreading wellness craze.
Premium Indian mineral water costs around $1 for a one-liter bottle, while imported brands are upwards of $3, or 15 times the price of the country’s lowest-priced basic bottled water.
Clean water is a privilege in the country of 1.4 billion people where ‌researchers say 70 percent of ‌the groundwater is contaminated. Tap water remains unfit to drink, and 16 people died in Indore city ‌after ⁠consuming contaminated ​tap water ‌in December.
Many in India see bottled water as a necessity and standard 20 US-cent bottles are available widely at convenience stores, restaurants and hotels. The market is worth nearly $5 billion annually and is set to grow 24 percent a year — among the fastest in the world.
Bottled water demand in United States or China is driven by convenience, making it a $30 billion-plus market in each country which will grow just 4-5 percent each year, Euromonitor says.
In India, the premium water segment is leading the surge in demand, accounting for 8 percent of the bottled water market last year compared to just 1 percent in 2021, Euromonitor said.
“Distrust of municipal water in some areas has escalated the demand for bottled water. Now, people understand how mineral water has more health benefits. It’s expensive, but the category will boom,” said Amulya Pandit, a senior consultant at Euromonitor specializing in the drinks ⁠market.
Among its consumers are New Delhi-based real estate developer B.S. Batra, who says his family uses only premium water at home to get more minerals and safeguard health.
“You feel different, more energetic during the day,” ‌said Batra, 49, an avid badminton player.
“I consume mineral water even with whisky at home, and ‍kids use it for their smoothies.”

WATER LURES BOLLYWOOD STAR, WEALTHY
The popular 20-cent plastic ‍bottled water is mainly made by Pepsi, Coca-Cola and Indian market leader Bisleri. In addition, Indians who can afford it, install purifiers in their homes which ‍clean the water but also remove most minerals.
Imported and local premium waters are luring wealthy consumers and businesses alike.
Bollywood star Bhumi Pednekar and her sister have launched Backbay — selling 750 ml cartons of mineral water for $2.2; Indian conglomerate Tata is expanding its premium water portfolio, and retailers and businesses are reporting higher sales.
Tata Consumer Products, also Starbucks’ partner in India, sells 20-cent bottled water, but premium water is its priority as it sees affluent, health-focused consumers willing to spend on the drink without worrying about the price, CEO Sunil D’Souza said in ​an interview.
“I don’t have to push water uphill...I see a long, long, long runway for the business,” he said.
Tata’s premium “Himalayan” mineral water factory — which a Reuters photographer visited — is located in the foothills of the Himalayan range in Himachal Pradesh state. Workers there largely ⁠keep a hands-free watch on machines filling plastic and glass bottles with water sourced from a natural underground aquifer.

LOOKING FOR SPRINGS
Most Indians prefer still water, and the sparkling variant remains niche. Tata said it plans to launch a sparkling Himalayan water, and is also scouting for natural springs for expanding its other offerings. At three Foodstories Indian gourmet stores, sales of premium waters tripled in 2025. Customer demand prompted the chain to import “light and creamy” Saratoga Spring Water from New York, which costs 799 rupees ($9) for a 355-milliliter (12-fluid-ounce) bottle, and stocks sold out within days, said co-founder Avni Biyani.
Indian mineral water brand Aava’s sales touched a record 805 million rupees ($9 million) last year, growing 40 percent a year since 2021. Tata said its basic and premium water portfolio will grow 30 percent a year, after growing tenfold to $65 million in six years.
Imported waters, which attract an over 30 percent tax, are pricier than Indian brands. Nestle’s Perrier and San Pellegrino, and Danone’s Evian retail for over 300 rupees, or $3.20, for a 750 ml bottle.
Nestle declined to comment, while Danone said the Indian bottled water market was growing at a “robust” pace but imported waters “tend to be niche and boutique.”
“When you open your tap, you’re not getting an Aava, Evian ... And that is what you’re essentially paying for,” said water sommelier Mehta.
At the water tasting session, some participants said they enjoyed the experience ‌but many found the price hard to swallow.
“To be honest, it is kind of expensive,” said executive Hoshini Vallabhaneni, one of 14 people at the event. “For everyday use — it will burn a hole in the pocket.” (Reporting by Aditya Kalra in New Delhi and Rishika Sadam in Hyderabad; Additional reporting by Alexander Marrow in London and Anushree Fadnavis ‌in Himachal Pradesh; Editing by Raju Gopalakrishnan)