NATO, Greenland vow to boost Arctic security after Trump threats

“75 years Nato” patch is seen on the arm of a member of the US military at the NATO Airborne Early Warning and Control Force headquarters in Geilenkirchen, western Germany, Nov. 13, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 12 January 2026
Follow

NATO, Greenland vow to boost Arctic security after Trump threats

  • NATO chief Mark Rutte said that the alliance was working on “the next steps” to bolster Arctic security
  • If US followed through with an armed attack on Greenland that it would spell the end of NATO, the Danish PM warned

NUUK: NATO and Greenland’s government on Monday said they intend to work on strengthening the defense of the Danish autonomous territory, hoping to dissuade US President Donald Trump, who covets the island.
On Sunday, Trump further stoked tensions by saying that the United States would take the territory “one way or the other.”
Confronted with the prospect of annexation by force, Greenlandic Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen placed his hopes in the US-led military alliance NATO.
“Our security and defense belong in NATO. That is a fundamental and firm line,” Nielsen said in a social media post.
His government “will therefore work to ensure that the development of defense in and around Greenland takes place in close cooperation with NATO, in dialogue with our allies, including the United States, and in cooperation with Denmark,” he added.
NATO chief Mark Rutte also said Monday that the alliance was working on “the next steps” to bolster Arctic security.
Diplomats at NATO say that some alliance members are floating ideas, including possibly launching a new mission in the region.
Discussions are at an embryonic stage and there are no concrete proposals on the table so far, they say.
Trump has insisted that Greenland needs to be brought under US control, arguing that the Danish autonomous territory is crucial for national security.
Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen has warned that if Washington followed through with an armed attack on Greenland that it would spell the end of NATO.
In a bid to appease Washington, Copenhagen has invested heavily in security in the region, allocating some 90 billion kroner ($14 billion) in 2025.
Greenland, which is home to some 57,000 people, is vast with significant mineral resources, most of them untapped, and is considered strategically located.
Since World War II and during the Cold War, the island housed several US military bases but only one remains.
According to Rutte, Denmark would have no problem with a larger US military presence on the island.
Under a 1951 treaty, updated in 2004, the United States could simply notify Denmark if it wanted to send more troops.

- Diplomacy -

Denmark is also working on the diplomatic front, with a meeting between Danish and Greenlandic representatives and US Secretary of State Marco Rubio expected this week.
According to US and Danish media reports, the meeting is set to take place Wednesday in Washington.
Danish Foreign Minister Lars Lokke Rasmussen on Monday posted a photo from a meeting with his Greenlandic counterpart Vivian Motzfeldt.
Denmark reportedly wants to present a united front with the leaders of the autonomous territory before the meeting with US representatives.
The Danish media reported last week on a tense videoconference between Danish lawmakers and their Greenlandic counterparts over how to negotiate with Washington.
Facing Trump’s repeated threats, Nielsen said in his message on Monday: “I fully understand if there is unease.”
In a statement published Monday, the government in the capital, Nuuk, said it “cannot accept under any circumstance” a US takeover of Greenland.
A Danish colony until 1953, Greenland gained home rule 26 years later and is contemplating eventually loosening its ties with Denmark.
Polls show that Greenland’s people strongly oppose a US takeover.
“We have been a colony for so many years. We are not ready to be a colony and colonized again,” fisherman Julius Nielsen told AFP over the weekend.


Pushed to margins, women vanish from Bangladesh’s political arena

Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Pushed to margins, women vanish from Bangladesh’s political arena

DHAKA: For more than three decades, Bangladesh was one of the few countries in the world to be led by women, yet there are almost none on the February 12 ballots.
Despite helping to spearhead the uprising that led to this vote, women are poised to be largely excluded from the South Asian country’s political arena.
Regardless of which parties win next week, the outcome will see Bangladesh governed almost exclusively by men.
“I used to be proud that even though my country is not the most liberal, we still had two women figureheads at the top,” first-time voter Ariana Rahman, 20. told AFP.
“Whoever won, the prime minister would be a woman.”
Women make up less than four percent of the candidates for this election: just 76 among the 1,981 contestants vying for 300 parliamentary seats.
And most of the parties put only men on their tickets.
Women’s political representation has always been limited in the conservative South Asian nation. Since independence, the highest number elected was 22 in 2018.
But from 1991 until the 2024 revolution, Bangladesh was helmed, represented abroad and politically defined by two women: Sheikh Hasina and Khaleda Zia.
Zia died in December after leading the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) for four decades and serving three terms as premier.
Hasina, the five-time prime minister overthrown in the July 2024 uprising, is hiding in India and sentenced to death in absentia for crimes against humanity.

- ‘Censored, vilified, judged’ -

Many rights campaigners had hoped the revolution that ended Hasina’s autocratic rule would usher in a period of greater equality, including for women.
While the caretaker government of Nobel Peace Prize winner Muhammad Yunus set up a Women’s Affairs Reform Commission, his interim administration has also been criticized for sidelining the body and making unilateral decisions without consulting women officials.
And there has been a surge of open support for Islamist groups, which want to limit women’s participation in public life.
After years of being suppressed, emboldened hard-liners have demanded organizers of religious commemorations and other public events remove women from the line-up, as well as calling for restrictions on activities like women’s football matches.
“Historically, women’s participation has always been low in our country, but there was an expectation for change after the uprising, which never happened,” said Mahrukh Mohiuddin, the spokesperson for women’s political rights organization Narir Rajnoitik Odhikar Forum (Women’s Political Rights Forum).
An entrenched patriarchal mindset means women are often relegated to household duties, she added.
Those who dare to speak out often face hostility.
“Women are censored, vilified... judged for simply being part of a political party,” said uprising leader Umama Fatema. “That is the reality.”
Even the group formed by student leaders of the revolution, the National Citizen Party (NCP), is fielding just two women among its 30 candidates.
“I don’t take part in any decision?making of my party, (and) the biggest and most important decisions are not taken in our presence,” said NCP member Samantha Sharmeen.
The NCP has allied with Jamaat-e-Islami, the largest Islamist party and one of 30 parties to have failed to nominate a single woman.

- ‘Can’t be any women leaders’ -

Jamaat’s assistant secretary general, Ahsanul Mahboob Zubair, said society was not yet “ready and safe” for women in politics.
Nurunnesa Siddiqa of its women’s wing added: “In an Islamic organization, there can’t be any women leaders, we have accepted that.”
One of the few women running in this election, Manisha Chakraborty, said women’s participation in Bangladesh’s politics has long been limited to tokenization.
The nation of 170 million people directly elects 300 lawmakers to its parliament, while another 50 are selected on a separate women’s list.
“The concept of reserved seats is insulting,” said Chakraborty, whose Bangladesh Socialist Party has nominated 10 women among it 29 candidates — the highest share in this poll.
“Lobbying, internal preference, nepotism — all play a role in making women’s participation in parliament just a formality,” she told AFP.
Former minister Abdul Moyeen Khan said the reserved seats “were meant to help women establish a foothold,” but “the opposite happened.”
Selima Rahman, the only woman on the BNP’s standing committee, said promising women leaders often “fade away” due to a lack of party support.
And while Zia and Hasina served important symbolic roles, she pointed to how both had been elevated to the pinnacle of power through family connections.
Student voter Ariana Rahman fears a long struggle lies ahead.
“More women in this election would have made me feel better represented,” she said. “The next few years are likely to be more hostile toward women.”