Le Pen: French far-right leader battling for political survival

French far-right leader and member of parliament Marine Le Pen, President of the French far-right National Rally party parliamentary group talk to journalists in Paris, Sept. 17, 2025. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 09 January 2026
Follow

Le Pen: French far-right leader battling for political survival

  • Le Pen has said prosecutors wanted her “political death,” adding that she was being put on trial as a “political target“
  • Her life has been marked by the legacy of her outwardly racist father

PARIS: Far-right leader Marine Le Pen, who needs to have a graft conviction overturned to seize her best chance at the French presidency, risks seeing her life’s work upended if she loses her appeal.
Le Pen took over leadership of the National Front (FN) in 2011 from her father Jean-Marie, who co-founded France’s main postwar far-right movement.
In a move to distance it from the legacy of her father, who openly made antisemitic and racist statements, she renamed the party the National Rally (RN) and embarked on a policy she dubbed “de-demonization.”
The work bore fruit. In snap legislative polls in summer 2023, the RN emerged as the largest single party in the National Assembly — although without the outright majority it had targeted.
That gave Le Pen’s party power over French politics it had never before enjoyed, which she used by backing a no-confidence vote that toppled the government of prime minister Michel Barnier later in the year.
Critics accuse the party of still being inherently racist, taking too long to distance itself from Russia after its invasion of Ukraine and resorting to corrupt tactics to ease its strained finances, allegations Le Pen denies.
But by playing on people’s day-to-day concerns about immigration and the cost of living, Le Pen was seen as having her best chance to become France’s president in 2027 after three unsuccessful attempts.

- ‘Political target’ -
But her conviction last year, involving the use of fake jobs at the European Union parliament to channel funds to her party to employ people in France, has posed a potentially insurmountable hurdle to her long-sought end goal.
She was banned with immediate effect from standing for office for five years, which effectively disqualified her from running in next year’s presidential election.
Le Pen, 57, has said prosecutors wanted her “political death,” adding that she was being put on trial as a “political target.”
With her own ambitions hanging in the balance, she has backed her young lieutenant and protege, 30-year-old Jordan Bardella, to run in her place if needed.
“Bardella can win instead of me,” she told La Tribune Dimanche in December.
A poll in November predicted that Bardella — who is the RN party chief and not among those accused in the trial against Le Pen — would win the second round of the 2027 elections, no matter who stands against him.

- ‘Immense pain’ -
After coming third in the 2012 presidential polls, Marine Le Pen made the run-off in 2017 and 2022 but was beaten by Emmanuel Macron on both occasions.
Yet 2027 could be different, with Macron not allowed to stand again under France’s constitution.
Le Pen’s life has been marked by the legacy of her outwardly racist father, a veteran of the long war in Algeria that ultimately led to the former French colony’s independence.
She expelled her father, who once called the gas chambers of the Holocaust a “detail of history,” from the party in 2011, helping to temper its toxic image.
But his death last year aged 96 plunged his daughter into grief.
“I will never forgive myself” for expelling him, she said, describing him as a “warrior” in a tribute.
“I know it caused him immense pain,” she said of the man opponents nicknamed “the devil of the republic.”
“This decision was one of the most difficult of my life. And until the end of my life, I will always ask myself the question: ‘Could I have done this differently?’,” she said.


US Treasury chief says retaliatory EU tariffs over Greenland ‘unwise’

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

US Treasury chief says retaliatory EU tariffs over Greenland ‘unwise’

  • He said Trump wanted control of the autonomous Danish territory because he considers it a “strategic asset” and “we are not going to outsource our hemispheric security to anyone else.”

Davos: US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned European nations on Monday against retaliatory tariffs over President Donald Trump’s threatened levies to obtain control of Greenland.
“I think it would be very unwise,” Bessent told reporters on the sidelines of the World Economic Forum in the Swiss ski resort of Davos.
He said Trump wanted control of the autonomous Danish territory because he considers it a “strategic asset” and “we are not going to outsource our hemispheric security to anyone else.”
Asked about Trump’s message to Norway’s prime minister, in which he appeared to link his Greenland push to not winning the Nobel Peace Prize, Bessent said: “I don’t know anything about the president’s letter to Norway.”
He added, however, that “I think it’s a complete canard that the president will be doing this because of the Nobel Prize.”
Trump said at the weekend that, from February 1, Britain, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Norway and Sweden would be subject to a 10-percent tariff on all goods sent to the United States until Denmark agrees to cede Greenland.
The announcement has drawn angry charges of “blackmail” from the US allies, and Germany’s vice chancellor Lars Klingbeil said Monday that Europe was preparing countermeasures.
Asked later Monday on the chances for a deal that would not involve acquiring Greenland, Bessent said “I would just take President Trump at his word for now.”
“How did the US get the Panama Canal? We bought it from the French,” he told a small group of journalists including AFP.
“How did the US get the US Virgin Islands? We bought it from the Danes.”
Bessent reiterated in particular the island’s strategic importance as a source of rare earth minerals that are critical for a range of cutting-edge technologies.
Referring to Denmark, he said: “What if one day they were worried about antagonizing the Chinese? They’ve already allowed Chinese mining in Greenland, right?“