Kidnapping fears strain family bonds in Nigeria

A street vendor pours drinks on Friday into children’s buckets outside the Central Mosque in Minna, Nigeria, amid growing concerns about security. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 06 December 2025
Follow

Kidnapping fears strain family bonds in Nigeria

  • Victims are only released after ransom payment, and those whose families fail to pay are killed
  • Niger is the largest of Nigeria’s 36 states in terms of landmass, covering more than twice the area of Belgium

MINNA, Nigeria: Abubakar Abdullahi has not seen his wife and five children in almost three months because he is too afraid to visit his hometown for fear of being kidnapped by criminal gangs roaming Nigeria’s countryside.
He has remained in Minna, the capital of the central Nigerian state of Niger, where he works as a civil servant. 
He has resorted to calling only his family in Kontagora, 200 km away.
Kontagora is located halfway between Papiri, where more than 300 school children were abducted from their dormitories two weeks ago in one of Nigeria’s worst mass kidnappings.
“I’m too scared to visit my family because of kidnappers,” the 45-year-old Abdullahi said at a restaurant in the city.
“I only communicate with them on the phone and send them upkeep money electronically at the end of each month,” said Abdullahi as he waited for his order.
He is yet to overcome the trauma of the kidnapping of his elder brother in 2022 from his Kontagora home and held for three months before he was freed after the family was forced to raise 50 million naira ($35,000) ransom.
Abdullahi’s dilemma is not peculiar to him, but shared by many residents of Minna, now separated from their families and friends in the countryside over kidnapping fears.
Mamman Alassan has not visited his village in Shiroro district since he moved to Minna three years ago.
“We are a culturally and religiously mixed society with close kinship ties, but the current security situation has made people stop going to see their people in the villages,” James David Gaza, a Catholic priest, said after mass outside his church.
“This is pulling us apart and destroying our social bonds,” Gaza said.
With families getting together for Christmas lunches and exchanging wrapped gifts in a few weeks, in parts of Nigeria, these will be through phone calls and electronic money transfers.
“All social interactions with people in rural areas, such as weddings, naming ceremonies, and funerals, have considerably reduced due to the prevailing situation,” said Isyaku Ibrahim Gada, a perfumer at the bustling Minna market.
Niger is one of several states in northwest and central Nigeria that criminal gangs have for years terrorized, called bandits who raid villages, abduct residents, and burn homes after looting them.
Although they live in the forest, bandits keep track of people in communities through networks of local informants who spy on them and report potential targets.
“They believe everyone from the city has money, which is why we are always their target,” Abdullahi said.
Niger is the largest of Nigeria’s 36 states in terms of landmass, covering more than twice the area of Belgium.
Its vast forests provide sanctuary for bandits. Once a victim is seized, escape is rare.
Victims are only released after ransom payment, and those whose families fail to pay are killed.
Isah Usman, 52, skipped his brother-in-law’s wedding in Kontagora two weeks ago.
“We no longer visit home; we only call and send whatever financial help we can offer to your relatives over there,” said Usman, a civil servant.
Even the recent arrest of eight suspected bandit informants in Kontagora will not make Usman change his mind.
Two weeks to Christmas, business is “slow” and “dull” for Ifeoma Onyejekwe, a second-hand clothes trader.
Hailing from eastern Nigeria, she has, over the years, built a strong bond with her customers from rural communities, whom she considers “relations.”
But these customers have stopped coming, and she can’t take her business to them either, out of fear of highway kidnappings.
“They are afraid to come in, and we are afraid to go and meet them,” said Onyejekwe.
“The relationship now is not that close.”

 


Geoeconomic confrontation tops global risks in 2026: WEF report

Updated 20 min 53 sec ago
Follow

Geoeconomic confrontation tops global risks in 2026: WEF report

  • Also armed conflict, extreme climate, public polarization, AI
  • None ‘a foregone conclusion,’ says WEF’s MD Saadia Zahidi

DUBAI: Geoeconomic confrontation has emerged as the top global risk this year, followed by state-based armed conflict, according to a new World Economic Forum report.

The Global Risks Report 2026, released on Wednesday, found that both risks climbed eight places year-on-year, underscoring a sharp deterioration in the global outlook amid increased international competition.

The top five risks are geoeconomic confrontation (18 percent of respondents), state-based armed conflict (14 percent), extreme weather events (8 percent), societal polarization (7 percent) and misinformation and disinformation (7 percent).

The WEF’s Managing Director Saadia Zahidi said the report “offers an early warning system as the age of competition compounds global risks — from geoeconomic confrontation to unchecked technology to rising debt — and changes our collective capacity to address them.

“But none of these risks are a foregone conclusion.”

The report assesses risks across three timeframes: immediate (2026); short-to-medium term (next two years); and long term (next 10 years).

Economic risks show the largest overall increase in the two-year outlook, with both economic downturn and inflation jumping eight positions.

Misinformation and disinformation rank fifth this year but rise to second place in the two-year outlook and fourth over the 10-year horizon.

The report suggests this reflects growing anxiety around the rapid adoption of artificial intelligence, with adverse outcomes linked to AI surging from 30th place in the two-year timeframe to fifth in the 10-year outlook.

Uncertainty dominates the global risk outlook, according to the report.

Surveyed leaders and experts view both the short- and long-term outlook negatively, with 50 percent expecting a turbulent or stormy global environment over the next two years, rising to 57 percent over the next decade.

A further 40 percent and 32 percent, respectively, describe the outlook as unsettled across the two- and 10-year timeframes, while just 1 percent anticipate a calm global outlook in either period.

Environmental risks ease slightly in the short-term rankings. Extreme weather fell from second to fourth place and pollution from sixth to ninth. Meanwhile, critical changes to Earth systems and biodiversity loss dropped seven and five positions, respectively.

However, over the next decade, environmental threats re-emerge as the most severe, with extreme weather, biodiversity loss, and critical changes to Earth systems topping the global risk rankings.

Looking ahead over the next decade, around 75 percent of respondents anticipate a turbulent or stormy environmental outlook, making it the most pessimistic assessment across all risk categories.

Zahidi said that “the challenges highlighted in the report underscore both the scale of the potential perils we face and our shared responsibility to shape what comes next.”

Despite the gloomy outlook, Zahidi signaled a positive shift in global cooperation.

 “It is also clear that new forms of global cooperation are already unfolding even amid competition, and the global economy is demonstrating resilience in the face of uncertainty.”

Now in its 21st year, the Global Risks Report highlights a core message: global risks cannot be managed without cooperation.

As competition intensifies, rebuilding trust and new forms of collaboration will be critical, with the report stressing that today’s decisions will shape future outcomes.

The report was released ahead of WEF’s annual meeting, which will be held in Davos from Jan. 19 to 23.