Hong Kong’s deadliest blaze in decades kills at least 94, scores missing

1 / 4
People shelter at an evacuation center on Thursday, after a deadly fire broke out at Wang Fuk Court housing complex, in Hong Kong. (Reuters)
2 / 4
Smoke rises from apartments after a major fire swept through several blocks at the Wang Fuk Court residential estate in Hong Kong's Tai Po district on Thursday. (AFP)
3 / 4
An apartment still smoulders after a major fire swept through several apartment blocks at the Wang Fuk Court residential estate in Hong Kong's Tai Po district, Hong Kong. (AFP)
4 / 4
A plane flies overhead as smoke rises from a deadly fire, which broke out yesterday at Wang Fuk Court housing complex, in Hong Kong, China November 27, 2025. (REUTERS)
Short Url
Updated 28 November 2025
Follow

Hong Kong’s deadliest blaze in decades kills at least 94, scores missing

  • Fire contained to four of the sprawling complex’s almost 2,000 units, more than 36 hours after the blaze broke out on the eight-building estate
  • Anti-corruption body investigating renovation work after police arrest three men on suspicion of negligently leaving foam packaging at the fire site

HONG KONG: Firefighters searched the last of the housing estate flats torched by Hong Kong’s worst fire in decades on Friday, with the death toll rising to at least 94 overnight and scores still missing.
Authorities said the fire had been contained to four of the sprawling complex’s almost 2,000 units, more than 36 hours after the blaze broke out on the eight-building estate.
Firefighters will conduct search and rescue operations in response to 25 remaining requests for help and break into all flats on the estate by 9 am (0100 GMT), said deputy director of fire services Derek Armstrong Chan.

More than 50 people were still hospitalized, with 12 in critical condition and 28 in serious condition. Scores remain missing, although the exact number has not been updated since early Thursday.
“The fire spread so quickly. I saw one hose trying to save several buildings, and I felt it was far too slow,” said a man surnamed Suen.
An AFP reporter at the scene on Friday saw that the fire at Wang Fuk Court had weakened significantly, but sparks and thick smoke still occasionally burst forth from the structure.
Firefighters continued to douse the building with water to cool the structure and prevent embers from re-igniting.
Authorities have begun investigating what sparked the blaze — the financial hub’s worst in almost 80 years — including the presence of bamboo scaffolding and plastic mesh wrapped around the structures as part of a major renovation.




This photograph taken on August 22, 2023 shows a building covered in netting and bamboo scaffolding at the North Point area of the Eastern District in Hong Kong. (AFP)

Hong Kong’s anti-corruption body said Thursday it had launched a probe into renovation work at the complex, hours after police said they had arrested three men on suspicion of negligently leaving foam packaging at the fire site.
Residents of Wang Fuk Court, located in Hong Kong’s northern district of Tai Po, told AFP that they did not hear any fire alarms and had to go door-to-door to alert neighbors to the danger.
“Ringing doorbells, knocking on doors, alerting the neighbors, telling them to leave — that’s what the situation was like,” resident Suen said.

‘Cannot describe it’ 

Of the 94 people confirmed dead as of 6:00 am local time (22:00 GMT Thursday), one was a 37-year-old firefighter and two were Indonesians working as migrant domestic workers.
It is Hong Kong’s deadliest fire since 1948, when an explosion followed by a fire killed at least 135 people.
But the toll could yet rise, with city leader John Lee saying in the early hours of Thursday that 279 people were unaccounted for.
Firefighters said later that they had made contact with some of those people and authorities have not updated the figure since.

On Thursday, police at a nearby community center hoping to identify victims showed photos of bodies pulled from the fire to people seeking missing loved ones.
“If the faces are unrecognizable, there are personal items for people to identify,” said a woman surnamed Cheung who was looking for her relatives.
“I cannot describe my feelings. There were children,” she said.
Deadly fires were once a regular scourge in densely populated Hong Kong, especially in poorer neighborhoods, but improved safety measures have made them far less common.
Hong Kong authorities will immediately inspect all housing estates undergoing major work following the disaster, city leader Lee said Thursday.
The city’s number-two official Eric Chan told a news conference Thursday it was “imperative to expedite the full transition to metal scaffolding.”
Hong Kong’s government said it was setting up a HK$300 million (38.5 million US dollars) fund to help victims of the fire.
City authorities said they had opened nine shelters and were organizing temporary accommodation and emergency funds for those who had lost their homes.
Activities around Hong Kong’s legislative elections, set to take place on December 7, have been suspended.

Hellish scenes 

Sections of charred scaffolding fell from the burning apartment blocks in hellish scenes late on Wednesday, as flames inside apartments sometimes belched out through windows into a night sky that glowed orange.
Fire services said the wind and drifting debris likely spread the fire from one building to another.
Some of the residents in adjacent blocks who had been evacuated as a precaution were allowed back into their homes on Thursday afternoon.
Crowds moved by the tragedy gathered near the complex to organize aid for displaced residents and firefighters, part of a spontaneous effort in a city that has some of the world’s most densely packed and tallest residential blocks.
Volunteers distributed clothes and lunch boxes at the open-air podium of a nearby mall, while a few people gave out flyers with information about missing people.
“It’s truly touching,” said Stone Ngai, 38, one of the organizers of an impromptu aid station.
“The spirit of Hong Kong people is that when one is in trouble, everyone lends support... It shows that Hong Kong people are full of love.”
 


House Republicans barely defeat Venezuela war powers resolution to check Trump’s military actions

Updated 23 January 2026
Follow

House Republicans barely defeat Venezuela war powers resolution to check Trump’s military actions

WASHINGTON: The House rejected a Democratic-backed resolution Thursday that would have prevented President Donald Trump from sending US military forces to Venezuela after a tied vote on the legislation fell just short of the majority needed for passage.
The tied vote was the latest sign of Republican House Speaker Mike Johnson’s tenuous hold on the majority, as well as some of the growing pushback in the GOP-controlled Congress to Trump’s aggressions in the Western Hemisphere. A Senate vote on a similar resolution was also tied last week until Vice President JD Vance broke the deadlock.
To defeat the resolution Thursday, Republican leaders had to hold the vote open for more than 20 minutes while Republican Rep. Wesley Hunt, who had been out of Washington all week campaigning for a Senate seat in Texas, rushed back to Capitol Hill to cast the decisive vote.
On the House floor, Democrats responded with shouts that Republican leaders were violating the chamber’s procedural rules. Two Republicans — Reps. Don Bacon of Nebraska and Thomas Massie of Kentucky — voted with all Democrats for the legislation.
The war powers resolution would have directed Trump to remove US troops from Venezuela. The Trump administration told senators last week that there are no US troops on the ground in the South American nation and committed to getting congressional approval before launching major military operations there.
But Democrats argued that the resolution is necessary after the US raid to capture Venezuelan leader Nicolás Maduro and since Trump has stated plans to control the country’s oil industry for years to come.
The response to Trump’s foreign policy
Thursday’s vote was the latest test in Congress of how much leeway Republicans will give a president who campaigned on removing the US from foreign entanglements but has increasingly reached for military options to impose his will in the Western Hemisphere. So far, almost all Republicans have declined to put checks on Trump through the war powers votes.
Rep. Brian Mast, the Republican chair of the House Armed Services Committee, accused Democrats of bringing the war powers resolution to a vote out of “spite” for Trump.
“It’s about the fact that you don’t want President Trump to arrest Maduro, and you will condemn him no matter what he does, even though he brought Maduro to justice with possibly the most successful law enforcement operation in history,” Mast added.
Still, Democrats stridently argued that Congress needs to assert its role in determining when the president can use wartime powers. They have been able to force a series of votes in both the House and Senate as Trump, in recent months, ramped up his campaign against Maduro and set his sights on other conflicts overseas.
“Donald Trump is reducing the United States to a regional bully with fewer allies and more enemies,” Rep. Gregory Meeks, the top Democrat on the House Foreign Affairs Committee, said during a floor debate. “This isn’t making America great again. It’s making us isolated and weak.”
Last week, Senate Republicans were only able to narrowly dismiss the Venezuela war powers resolution after the Trump administration persuaded two Republicans to back away from their earlier support. As part of that effort, Secretary of State Marco Rubio committed to a briefing next week before the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.
Yet Trump’s insistence that the US will possess Greenland over the objections of Denmark, a NATO ally, has alarmed some Republicans on Capitol Hill. They have mounted some of the most outspoken objections to almost anything the president has done since taking office.
Trump this week backed away from military and tariff threats against European allies as he announced that his administration was working with NATO on a “framework of a future deal” on Arctic security.
But Bacon still expressed frustration with Trump’s aggressive foreign policy and voted for the war powers resolution even though it only applies to Venezuela.
“I’m tired of all the threats,” he said.
Trump’s recent military actions — and threats to do more — have reignited a decades-old debate in Congress over the War Powers Act, a law passed in the early 1970s by lawmakers looking to claw back their authority over military actions.
The war powers debate
The War Powers Resolution was passed in the Vietnam War era as the US sent troops to conflicts throughout Asia. It attempted to force presidents to work with Congress to deploy troops if there hasn’t already been a formal declaration of war.
Under the legislation, lawmakers can also force votes on legislation that directs the president to remove US forces from hostilities.
Presidents have long tested the limits of those parameters, and Democrats argue that Trump in his second term has pushed those limits farther than ever.
The Trump administration left Congress in the dark ahead of the surprise raid to capture Maduro. It has also used an evolving set of legal justifications to blow up alleged drug boats and seize sanctioned oil tankers near Venezuela.
Democrats question who gets to benefit from Venezuelan oil licenses
As the Trump administration oversees the sale of Venezuela’s petroleum worldwide, Senate Democrats are also questioning who is benefiting from the contracts.
In one of the first transactions, the US granted Vitol, the world’s largest independent oil broker, a license worth roughly $250 million. A senior partner at Vitol, John Addison, gave roughly $6 million to Trump-aligned political action committees during the presidential election, according to donation records compiled by OpenSecrets.
“Congress and the American people deserve full transparency regarding any financial commitments, promises, deals, or other arrangements related to Venezuela that could favor donors to the President’s campaign and political operation,” 13 Democratic senators wrote to White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles Thursday in a letter led by Democratic Sen. Adam Schiff of California.
The White House has said it is safeguarding the South American country’s oil for the benefit of both the people of Venezuela and the US