India intensifies crackdown in disputed Kashmir after New Delhi bombing

An Indian paramilitary soldier body frisks a civilian during a security check in Srinagar, Indian-controlled Kashmir on Nov. 25, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 26 November 2025
Follow

India intensifies crackdown in disputed Kashmir after New Delhi bombing

  • The Nov. 10 explosion near New Delhi’s historic Red Fort killed at least 10 people and wounded 32 others
  • Indian investigators quickly focused on Kashmir, launching sweeping raids, detaining suspects and questioning thousands

NEW DELHI: Hours after police in Indian-controlled Kashmir released shopkeeper Bilal Ahmed Wani but kept his son in custody in this month’s deadly New Delhi blast investigation, Wani set himself on fire, members of his family said.
The 55-year-old dry fruit seller was treated at three hospitals but died a day later. His relatives, who spoke on condition of anonymity as they feared reprisals from authorities for talking to media, said stress and humiliation over the detentions drove him to self-immolation. Police said Wani died due to “self-inflicted burn injuries.”
The Nov. 10 explosion near New Delhi’s historic Red Fort killed at least 10 people and wounded 32 others. Indian investigators quickly focused on Kashmir, launching sweeping raids, detaining suspects and questioning thousands for possible links to what authorities called a “heinous terror incident.” Hundreds still remain in custody.
The blast occurred hours after police in Indian-controlled Kashmir said they had dismantled a suspected militant cell operating from the region to the outskirts of New Delhi. Officers initially arrested at least seven people, including two Kashmiri doctors, and seized a large quantity of bombmaking material in Faridabad, a city near the capital.
On Nov. 14, some of the explosives seized in Faridabad and brought to a police station in Kashmir’s Srinagar city detonated, killing at least nine people. Authorities were still investigating the police station blast but the region’s top police officer, Nalin Prabhat, ruled out any sabotage, indicating mishandling of the explosive material may have caused the explosion.
Crackdown drove man to despair, relatives say
The New Delhi blast set off a sweeping security crackdown in Kashmir, marked by raids, mass questioning and dozens of detentions.
Police detained Wani’s eldest son, student Jasir Bilal Wani, on Nov. 14. A day later, authorities held Wani, his younger son and his brother, who is a physics lecturer. Wani and the younger son were released that evening, and his brother was freed after Wani’s death.
Wani’s relatives said the men were innocent and accused authorities of using them as scapegoats.
They said Wani returned home a day later, distraught and broken. The next morning, he walked outside, doused himself with gasoline and set himself ablaze, relatives said. He was rushed to a nearby hospital, which referred him to a larger medical facility before being transferred to the main hospital in Srinagar where he died, they said.
There have been security crackdowns in the region before, especially during periods of mass public uprising. But the ongoing crackdown is notably severe, topped only by restrictions imposed in 2019, when India revoked the special status for Indian-controlled Kashmir, which had given the region a degree of autonomy.
Fear in the medical community
India’s National Investigation Agency said the car used in the New Delhi blast was registered to a Kashmiri man and identified the suspected suicide bomber as Umar Un Nabi, a doctor.
Government forces demolished his family home in Kashmir’s southern Pulwama district, officials said. Troops have previously blown up houses of suspects they accuse of aiding militants fighting Indian rule in Kashmir.
The agency said last week that Wani’s son “worked closely with the terrorist Umar Un Nabi to plan the terror carnage,” alleging he provided technical support by modifying drones and attempting to make rockets. He remains in custody.
Authorities have also intensified a crackdown on what police call a “white-collar terror ecosystem of radicalized professionals and students,” increasing scrutiny of several Kashmiri doctors. Police said such individuals have maintained contact with “foreign handlers based in Pakistan and other countries.”
Security officials have reportedly sought details about doctors’ personal backgrounds, professional networks and ideological leanings, prompting anxiety and fear within the medical community. Several doctors, speaking on condition of anonymity because they feared reprisals for talking to the media, described the scrutiny as unprecedented and intrusive.
Avinash Mohananey, a former Indian intelligence officer who served in Kashmir and Pakistan, said that the module, regardless of what authorities call it, involved educated people and reflects deep anger that has been building beneath the surface for a long time.
Mohananey said Kashmiris feel a deep, underlying anger because their political aspirations remain unmet and that the region’s people “feel disempowered and humiliated.”
A groundswell of anger
Militants in the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir have been fighting New Delhi’s rule since 1989. India insists the Kashmir militancy is Pakistan-sponsored terrorism. Pakistan denies the charge, and many Kashmiris consider it a legitimate freedom struggle.
India and Pakistan each administer a part of Kashmir, but both claim the territory in its entirety.
Praveen Donthi, a senior analyst with the International Crisis Group, said the political disenfranchisement following India’s 2019 decision “is fueling a groundswell of quiet anger and a resurgence of militancy.”
Since then authorities in the region have increased their crackdown on pro-freedom groups, the free press and rights activists. In New Delhi’s effort to shape what it calls “Naya Kashmir,” or a “new Kashmir,” the territory’s people have been largely silenced, with their civil liberties curbed, as India has shown no tolerance for any form of dissent.
Donthi said the crackdown following the New Delhi blast “is adding to the existing sense of pervasive insecurity and vulnerability, which is unlikely to help address the alienation and anger, but rather to fan them further.”
“A moderate approach by New Delhi to the region would be far more effective in preventing any further cycle of violence,” he said.


Judge bars federal prosecutors from seeking the death penalty against Luigi Mangione

Updated 59 min 5 sec ago
Follow

Judge bars federal prosecutors from seeking the death penalty against Luigi Mangione

  • Judge Margaret Garnett’s Friday ruling foiled the Trump administration’s bid to see Mangione executed
  • Garnett dismissed a federal murder charge against Mangione, finding it technically flawed. She left in place stalking charges that could carry a life sentence

NEW YORK: Federal prosecutors can’t seek the death penalty against Luigi Mangione in the killing of UnitedHealthcare CEO Brian Thompson, a federal judge ruled Friday, foiling the Trump administration’s bid to see him executed for what it called a “premeditated, cold-blooded assassination that shocked America.”
Judge Margaret Garnett dismissed a federal murder charge that had enabled prosecutors to seek capital punishment, finding it technically flawed. She wrote that she did so to “foreclose the death penalty as an available punishment to be considered by the jury” as it weighs whether to convict Mangione.
Garnett also dismissed a gun charge but left in place stalking charges that carry a maximum punishment of life in prison. To seek the death penalty, prosecutors needed to show that Mangione killed Thompson while committing another “crime of violence.” Stalking doesn’t fit that definition, Garnett wrote in her opinion, citing case law and legal precedents.
In a win for prosecutors, Garnett ruled they can use evidence collected from his backpack during his arrest, including a 9mm handgun and a notebook in which authorities say Mangione described his intent to “wack” an insurance executive. Mangione’s lawyers had sought to exclude those items, arguing the search was illegal because police hadn’t yet obtained a warrant.
During a hearing Friday, Garnett gave prosecutors 30 days to update her on whether they’ll appeal her death penalty decision. A spokesperson for the US attorney’s office in Manhattan, which is prosecuting the federal case, declined to comment.
Garnett acknowledged that the decision “may strike the average person — and indeed many lawyers and judges — as tortured and strange, and the result may seem contrary to our intuitions about the criminal law.” But, she said, it reflected her “committed effort to faithfully apply the dictates of the Supreme Court to the charges in this case. The law must be the Court’s only concern.”
Mangione, 27, appeared relaxed as he sat with his lawyers during the scheduled hearing, which took place about an hour after Garnett issued her written ruling. Prosecutors retained their right to appeal but said they were ready to proceed to trial.
Outside court afterward, Mangione attorney Karen Friedman Agnifilo said her client and his defense team were relieved by the “incredible decision.”
Jury selection in the federal case is set for Sept. 8, followed by opening statements and testimony on Oct. 13. The state trial’s date hasn’t been set. On Wednesday, the Manhattan district attorney’s office urged the judge in that case to schedule a July 1 trial date.
“That case is none of my concern,” Garnett said, adding that she would proceed as if the federal case is the only case unless she hears formally from parties involved in the state case. She also said the federal case will be paused if the government appeals her death penalty ruling.
Thompson, 50, was killed on Dec. 4, 2024, as he walked to a midtown Manhattan hotel for UnitedHealth Group’s annual investor conference. Surveillance video showed a masked gunman shooting him from behind. Police say “delay,” “deny” and “depose” were written on the ammunition, mimicking a phrase used by critics to describe how insurers avoid paying claims.
Mangione, an Ivy League graduate from a wealthy Maryland family, was arrested five days later at a McDonald’s in Altoona, Pennsylvania, about 230 miles (about 370 kilometers) west of Manhattan.
Following through on Trump’s campaign promise to vigorously pursue capital punishment, Attorney General Pam Bondi ordered Manhattan federal prosecutors last April to seek the death penalty against Mangione.
It was the first time the Justice Department sought the death penalty in President Donald Trump’s second term. He returned to office a year ago with a vow to resume federal executions after they were halted under his predecessor, President Joe Biden.
Garnett, a Biden appointee and former Manhattan federal prosecutor, ruled after hearing oral arguments earlier this month.
Besides seeking to have the death penalty rejected on the grounds Garnett cited, Mangione’s lawyers argued that Bondi’s announcement flouted long-established Justice Department protocols and was “based on politics, not merit.”
They said her remarks, followed by posts to her Instagram account and a TV appearance, “indelibly prejudiced” the grand jury process resulting in his indictment weeks later.
Prosecutors urged Garnett to keep the death penalty on the table, arguing that the charges were legally sound and Bondi’s remarks weren’t prejudicial, as “pretrial publicity, even when intense, is not itself a constitutional defect.”
Prosecutors argued that careful questioning of prospective jurors would alleviate the defense’s concerns about their knowledge of the case and ensure Mangione’s rights are respected at trial.
“What the defendant recasts as a constitutional crisis is merely a repackaging of arguments” rejected in previous cases, prosecutors said. “None warrants dismissal of the indictment or categorical preclusion of a congressionally authorized punishment.”