Washington, Kyiv say a peace deal must ‘fully uphold’ Ukraine sovereignty

1 / 2
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, right, and Andriy Yermak, head of Ukraine's Office of the President, talk to the press as their consultations continue at the US Mission to International Organizations in Geneva on Nov. 23, 2025. (Keystone via AP)
2 / 2
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, next to US special envoy Steve Witkoff, faces the Ukrainian delegation during discussions on US plan to end the war in Ukraine at US Mission in Geneva, on Nov. 23, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 24 November 2025
Follow

Washington, Kyiv say a peace deal must ‘fully uphold’ Ukraine sovereignty

  • Joint statement after initial meeting announced that the “talks were constructive ... underscoring the shared commitment to achieving a just and lasting peace” 
  • Kyiv and EU allies are seeking changes to Trump's 28-point plan requiring the invaded country to cede territory, cut its army and pledge never to join NATO

GENEVA: Washington and Kyiv said Sunday that any eventual deal to halt the war with Russia must fully uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty, after “constructive” talks between US, Ukrainian and European officials in Geneva.
After a day of meetings that kicked off based on a US proposal that was criticized as being in Russia’s favor, negotiators have drafted “an updated and refined peace framework,” a US-Ukraine joint statement said.
US President Donald Trump had given Ukraine until November 27 to approve his plan to end the nearly four-year conflict, which began after Russia launched a full-scale invasion.
But Kyiv was seeking changes to the draft that accepted a range of Russia’s hard-line demands, with the 28-point plan requiring the invaded country to cede territory, cut its army and pledge never to join NATO.
“The talks were constructive, focused, and respectful, underscoring the shared commitment to achieving a just and lasting peace,” the joint statement said.
“They reaffirmed that any future agreement must fully uphold Ukraine’s sovereignty and deliver a sustainable and just peace,” it said, noting “meaningful progress.”

 

Both sides pledged to keep working on joint proposals “in the coming days.”
But even as the White House said in a separate statement that the talks marked “a “significant step forward,” a Russian drone strike on the major Ukrainian city of Kharkiv killed four people, its mayor said.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio boasted “tremendous” progress after a day of meetings, while the head of Ukraine’s delegation Andriy Yermak also told reporters the sides had made “very good progress.”
Rubio, whose delegation included Trump’s son-in-law Jared Kushner and diplomatic envoy Steve Witkoff, told reporters that the work to narrow the areas of disagreement had advanced “in a very substantial way.”
“I can tell you that the items that remain open are not insurmountable,” he said, adding “I honestly believe we’ll get there.”
Rubio stressed that any final agreement would “have to be agreed upon by the presidents, and there are a couple issues that we need to continue to work on” before trying to bring onboard the Kremlin, which welcomed the original proposal.
“Obviously, the Russians get a vote.”




Medical workers carry a body at the site of a building hit during Russian drone strikes, amid Russia's attack on Ukraine, in Kharkiv, Ukraine, on Nov. 23, 2025. (REUTERS)

‘Zero gratitude’ claim 

His comments came after Trump earlier lashed out at Ukraine.
“UKRAINE ‘LEADERSHIP’ HAS EXPRESSED ZERO GRATITUDE FOR OUR EFFORTS,” Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform, also accusing European countries of not doing enough to stop the war, but offering no direct condemnation of Moscow.
Not long after, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on X that his country was “grateful to the United States... and personally to President Trump” for the assistance that has been “saving Ukrainian lives.”
Announcing a deadly Russian drone strike, Kharkiv mayor Igor Terekhov said on Telegram Sunday it was “truly horrible” that despite the negotiations, “Russian troops are attacking civilian objects, civilian infrastructure, residential buildings.”
The Ukrainian delegation had referred to a new version of the US draft plan, which has yet to be published, saying it “already reflects most of Ukraine’s key priorities.”
At the end of the day, Rubio said he thought Trump was “quite pleased at the reports we’ve given him about the amount of progress that’s been made.”
Asked about whether he believed a deal could be reached by Thursday, as demanded by the US president, he said “the deadline is we want to get this done as soon as possible.”
“I think we made a tremendous amount of progress. I feel very optimistic that we’re going to get there in a very reasonable period of time, very soon.”




Head of the Office of the President of Ukraine Andriy Yermak, center, at the beginning of talks with the US delegation at the US Mission to International Organizations in Geneva, Switzerland, on Nov. 23, 2025. (Keystone via AP)

European ‘centrality’ 

Rubio said that his delegation had met Sunday with “national security advisers from various European countries.”
Ukraine’s delegation also met high-level officials from Britain, France and Germany.
The US plan was drafted without input from Ukraine’s European allies, who were scrambling Sunday to make their voices heard and boost Kyiv’s position.
“Ukraine must have the freedom and sovereign right to choose its own destiny. They have chosen a European destiny,” EU chief Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement, stressing that the “centrality” of the European Union’s role must be “fully reflected” in any peace plan.
A number of leaders called Trump Sunday, with Downing Street saying UK Prime Minister Keir Starmer and the US president had agreed “that we all must work together at this critical moment to bring about a just and lasting peace.”
 


Federal judge rules Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detained by immigration authorities

Updated 5 sec ago
Follow

Federal judge rules Kilmar Abrego Garcia can’t be re-detained by immigration authorities

  • Abrego Garcia has an American wife and child and has lived in Maryland for years

U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement cannot re-detain Kilmar Abrego Garcia because a 90-day detention period has expired and the government has no viable plan for deporting him, a federal judge ruled on Tuesday.
The Salvadoran national’s case has become a focal point in the immigration debate after he was mistakenly deported to his home country last year. Since his return, he has been fighting a second deportation to a series of African countries proposed by Department of Homeland Security officials.
The government “made one empty threat after another to remove him to countries in Africa with no real chance of success,” U.S. District Judge Paula Xinis, in Maryland, wrote in her Tuesday order. “From this, the Court easily concludes that there is no ‘good reason to believe’ removal is likely in the reasonably foreseeable future.”
Homeland Security did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.
Abrego Garcia has an American wife and child and has lived in Maryland for years, but he immigrated to the U.S. illegally as a teenager. In 2019, an immigration judge ruled that he could not be deported to El Salvador because he faced danger there from a gang that had threatened his family. By mistake, he was deported there anyway last year.
Facing public pressure and a court order, President Donald Trump’s administration brought him back in June, but only after securing an indictment charging him with human smuggling in Tennessee. He has pleaded not guilty. Meanwhile, Trump officials have said he cannot stay in the U.S. In court filings, officials have said they intended to deport him to Uganda, Eswatini, Ghana, and Liberia.
In her Tuesday order, Xinis noted the government has “purposely — and for no reason — ignored the one country that has consistently offered to accept Abrego Garcia as a refugee, and to which he agrees to go.” That country is Costa Rica.
Abrego Garcia's attorney, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, argued in court that immigration detention is not supposed to be a punishment. Immigrants can only be detained as a way to facilitate their deportation and cannot be held indefinitely with no viable deportation plan.
“Since Judge Xinis ordered Mr. Abrego Garcia released in mid-December, the government has tried one trick after another to try to get him re-detained,” Sandoval-Moshenberg wrote in an email on Tuesday. “In her decision today, she recognized that if the government were truly trying to remove Mr. Abrego Garcia from the United States, they would have sent him to Costa Rica long before today.”
The government should now engage in a good-faith effort to work out the details of removal to Costa Rica, Sandoval-Moshenberg wrote.