What did countries agree to at COP30?

Brazil environment minister Marina Silva (second from left), COP30 President Andrea Correa do Lago (center) and COP30 CEO Ana Toni (second from right), attend a news conference at the COP30 UN Climate Summit on Nov. 22, 2025, in Belem, Brazil. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 23 November 2025
Follow

What did countries agree to at COP30?

BELÉM, Brazil: The COP30 climate summit has drawn to a close after two weeks in the Amazonian city of Belem where protests, street marches and even a fire caused unexpected moments of drama.
But beneath enormous tents erected over a former airport at the edge of the rainforest, nations also adopted some decisions on how to battle climate change.
Here are the main negotiated outcomes, and the voluntary commitments, made during the summit attended by nearly 200 nations:

Fossil fuels

The thorniest issues were bundled into a “mutirao” pact — the summit’s slogan, drawn from the Tupi-Guarani word for “collective effort.”
The agreement included an initiative for countries to collaborate on a voluntary basis to reduce carbon emissions and strive to limit global warming to 1.5C relative to pre-industrial levels.
It also noted a commitment made by all nations at COP28 in Dubai to “transition away from fossil fuels” — but this exact phrase, which has become politically sensitive, was not included.
Despite pressure from more than 80 nations from Europe to Latin American to the Pacific, the conference did not adopt a “roadmap” to phase out fossil fuels.
Instead, COP30 president Andre Correa do Lago offered to create one for countries willing to join on a voluntary basis, and another plan to halt deforestation.

Finance

The world’s poorest nations have long complained they lack the finance for “adaptation” — measures to protect their economies from rising seas, such as building sea walls, and other impacts of climate change.
In a win for developing countries at COP30, the final agreement “calls for efforts to at least triple adaptation finance by 2035.”
In 2024, rich countries agreed to provide $300 billion a year by 2035 in climate finance to developing nations, with no specific amount earmarked for adaptation.
Most of that goes to projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, such as renewable energy, and not to adaptation — something developing nations have long complained puts them at a disadvantage.
The “tripling” goal agreed in Belem could mean $120 billion from that $300 billion is earmarked for adaptation, but close observers said clarity was still needed around that target.

Trade

For the first time, trade has been included as a pillar of the final text, with a three-year dialogue to take place under the climate framework.
This reflected concerns from countries including China that trade measures — like taxes on carbon-intensive goods — could erode export revenues or throw up barriers to green technology sales.

Forests

At COP30, Brazil launched a new global investment vehicle that proposes paying out a share of profits to forest-rich countries for every hectare of trees they leave standing.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva announced during a leaders’ summit in Belem last week — even before COP30 officially started — the launch of the Tropical Forests Forever Facility.
The TFFF attracted $5.5 billion in pledges from Norway, Germany, Indonesia, France and Brazil — the biggest contributors.
Ultimately, Brazil is seeking to raise $125 billion in public and private investment, but said the fund could start working even without the full $25 billion in startup capital from governments.

Methane pledges

Slashing methane emissions — the second-largest contributor to climate change after carbon dioxide — is considered one of the fastest ways to curb global warming.
Although it remains in the atmosphere for about 12 years, the “super pollutant” is roughly 80 times more potent than CO2 over a 20-year period.
At COP30, seven countries — Britain, France, Canada, Germany, Norway, Japan and Kazakhstan — signed a statement vowing to achieve “near zero” methane emissions across the fossil fuel sector.


Norway launches probe of Middle East diplomat and husband over Epstein links

Updated 09 February 2026
Follow

Norway launches probe of Middle East diplomat and husband over Epstein links

  • Mona Juul resigned from her position as ambassador to Jordan and Iraq
  • Juul and her husband Terje Rod-Larsen played key roles in the Israeli-Palestinian negotiations which led to the Oslo Accords

OSLO: Norwegian police said Monday they have launched an “aggravated corruption” investigation against a high-profile diplomat, Mona Juul, and her husband Terje Rod-Larsen, over the couple’s links to late US sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
The police economic crime unit Okokrim said in statement that the probe began last week and that an Oslo residence was searched on Monday, as well as a residence belonging to a witness.
“We have launched an investigation to determine whether any criminal offenses have been committed. We are facing a comprehensive and, by all accounts lengthy investigation,” Okokrim chief Pal Lonseth, said.
Juul, 66, and Rod-Larsen, 78, played key roles in the secret Israeli-Palestinian negotiations which led to the Oslo Accords of the early 1990s.
Epstein left $10 million in his will to the couple’s two children, according to Norwegian media.
“Among other things, Okokrim will investigate whether she received benefits in connection to her position,” the statement said.
On Sunday, the foreign ministry announced that Juul had resigned from her position as ambassador to Jordan and Iraq.
“Juul’s contact with the convicted abuser Epstein has shown a serious lapse in judgment,” Foreign Minister Espen Barth Eide said in connection to the announcement.
She had already been temporarily suspended last week pending an internal investigation by the ministry into her alleged links to Epstein, who died in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking.
Norway’s political and royal circles have been thrust into the eye of the Epstein storm, including the CEO of the World Economic Forum Borge Brende.
Former prime minister Thorbjorn Jagland, is also being investigated for “aggravated corruption” over links to Epstein while he was chair of the Norwegian Nobel Committee — which awards the Nobel Peace Prize — and as secretary general of the Council of Europe.
Norway’s Crown Princess Mette-Marit has also come under scrutiny for her relationship with Epstein, which on Friday she said she “deeply regretted.”
On Monday, Norwegian Prime Minister Jonas Gahr Store voiced support for the establishing of an independent commission set up by Parliament, to fully examine the nature of the ties between these figures and Epstein.