What did countries agree to at COP30?

Brazil environment minister Marina Silva (second from left), COP30 President Andrea Correa do Lago (center) and COP30 CEO Ana Toni (second from right), attend a news conference at the COP30 UN Climate Summit on Nov. 22, 2025, in Belem, Brazil. (AP Photo)
Short Url
Updated 23 November 2025
Follow

What did countries agree to at COP30?

BELÉM, Brazil: The COP30 climate summit has drawn to a close after two weeks in the Amazonian city of Belem where protests, street marches and even a fire caused unexpected moments of drama.
But beneath enormous tents erected over a former airport at the edge of the rainforest, nations also adopted some decisions on how to battle climate change.
Here are the main negotiated outcomes, and the voluntary commitments, made during the summit attended by nearly 200 nations:

Fossil fuels

The thorniest issues were bundled into a “mutirao” pact — the summit’s slogan, drawn from the Tupi-Guarani word for “collective effort.”
The agreement included an initiative for countries to collaborate on a voluntary basis to reduce carbon emissions and strive to limit global warming to 1.5C relative to pre-industrial levels.
It also noted a commitment made by all nations at COP28 in Dubai to “transition away from fossil fuels” — but this exact phrase, which has become politically sensitive, was not included.
Despite pressure from more than 80 nations from Europe to Latin American to the Pacific, the conference did not adopt a “roadmap” to phase out fossil fuels.
Instead, COP30 president Andre Correa do Lago offered to create one for countries willing to join on a voluntary basis, and another plan to halt deforestation.

Finance

The world’s poorest nations have long complained they lack the finance for “adaptation” — measures to protect their economies from rising seas, such as building sea walls, and other impacts of climate change.
In a win for developing countries at COP30, the final agreement “calls for efforts to at least triple adaptation finance by 2035.”
In 2024, rich countries agreed to provide $300 billion a year by 2035 in climate finance to developing nations, with no specific amount earmarked for adaptation.
Most of that goes to projects that reduce greenhouse gas emissions, such as renewable energy, and not to adaptation — something developing nations have long complained puts them at a disadvantage.
The “tripling” goal agreed in Belem could mean $120 billion from that $300 billion is earmarked for adaptation, but close observers said clarity was still needed around that target.

Trade

For the first time, trade has been included as a pillar of the final text, with a three-year dialogue to take place under the climate framework.
This reflected concerns from countries including China that trade measures — like taxes on carbon-intensive goods — could erode export revenues or throw up barriers to green technology sales.

Forests

At COP30, Brazil launched a new global investment vehicle that proposes paying out a share of profits to forest-rich countries for every hectare of trees they leave standing.
Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva announced during a leaders’ summit in Belem last week — even before COP30 officially started — the launch of the Tropical Forests Forever Facility.
The TFFF attracted $5.5 billion in pledges from Norway, Germany, Indonesia, France and Brazil — the biggest contributors.
Ultimately, Brazil is seeking to raise $125 billion in public and private investment, but said the fund could start working even without the full $25 billion in startup capital from governments.

Methane pledges

Slashing methane emissions — the second-largest contributor to climate change after carbon dioxide — is considered one of the fastest ways to curb global warming.
Although it remains in the atmosphere for about 12 years, the “super pollutant” is roughly 80 times more potent than CO2 over a 20-year period.
At COP30, seven countries — Britain, France, Canada, Germany, Norway, Japan and Kazakhstan — signed a statement vowing to achieve “near zero” methane emissions across the fossil fuel sector.


Around the world, refugees are shut out of the US by Trump’s new policies

U.S. Chief Border Patrol Agent, Gregory Bovino talks to a detained migrant on December 5, 2025 in New Orleans, Louisiana. (AFP)
Updated 3 sec ago
Follow

Around the world, refugees are shut out of the US by Trump’s new policies

  • About 600,000 people were being processed to come to the US as refugees around the world when the program was halted, according to the administration

WASHINGTON: When President Donald Trump suspended the refugee program on day one of his current administration, thousands of people around the world who had been so close to a new life in America found themselves abandoned.
Many had already sold possessions or ended leases in preparation for travel. They had submitted reams of documents supporting their cases, been interviewed by US officials and in many cases already had tickets to fly to America.
As part of Trump’s crackdown on both legal and illegal migration, the Republican president has upended the decades-old refugee program that has served as a beacon for those fleeing war and persecution. In October, he resumed the program but set a historic low of refugee admissions at just 7,500 — mostly white South Africans.
A litany of new restrictions was announced after an Afghan national became the suspect in the shooting of two National Guard members last week. The Trump administration also plans a review of refugees let in during the Democratic Biden administration. Trump’s administration has cited economic and national security concerns for its policy changes.
About 600,000 people were being processed to come to the US as refugees around the world when the program was halted, according to the administration. Dozens of white South Africans have been let in this year. But only about 100 others have been admitted as a result of a lawsuit by advocates seeking to restart the refugee program, said Mevlüde Akay Alp, a lawyer arguing the case.
“It’s important that we don’t abandon those families and that we don’t abandon the thousands of people who were relying on the promise of coming here as refugees,” said Akay Alp, with the International Refugee Assistance Project.
The Associated Press spoke to three families whose lives have been thrown into disarray because of the changing policies.
A family separated by tightened restrictions
The Dawoods had waited years for the opportunity to come to the US After fleeing civil war in Syria, they settled in northern Iraq. They hoped to find a home that could provide better medical care for a daughter who had fallen from the fourth floor of the family’s apartment building.
After they were accepted as refugees to the US, son Ibrahim and his sister Ava relocated to New Haven, Connecticut, in November 2024. His parents and one of his brothers were scheduled to fly in January.
But just two days before they were to board their flight, mother Hayat Fatah fainted at a medical check and her departure was postponed. Mohammed, another sibling, didn’t want to leave his parents behind.
“I said: ‘This is it. The chance is gone.’ But I had to stay with my father and mother,” Mohammed said.
Nearly a year later, he and his parents are still waiting. Without a residency card, Mohammed can’t work or travel outside of their home in the city of Irbil. The family gets by on money sent from relatives abroad.
Mohammed had dreams for his hoped-for new life in America: starting a business or finishing his studies to become a petroleum engineer; getting married and building a family.
“Whether it was now, a year from now, two years later or four years, I will wait and hope that I will go,” he said.
In America, Ibrahim often wakes up early to tutor people online before going to his job as a math teacher at a private school, and then he takes care of his sister when he gets home. He said his mother often cries when they talk because she wishes she were in America to help care for her daughter.
Ibrahim said one solace has been the welcome he’s received in the US Volunteers have stepped in to take him and his sister to frequent doctor appointments and helped them adjust to their new lives.
“I really appreciate the kindness of the people here,” he said.
After a decade in limbo, a Chinese pastor wonders when his turn will come
Chinese Christian Lu Taizhi fled to Thailand more than a decade ago, fearing persecution for his beliefs. He’s lived in legal limbo since, waiting to be resettled in the United States.
Lu said he has long admired the US for what he calls its Christian character — a place where he feels he and his family “can seek freedom.” He said he was disappointed that people like him and his family who applied for refugee status legally face so many difficulties in going to the US
“I oppose illegal immigration. Many are fake refugees, or illegal immigrants, they’ve never faced oppression. I’m opposed to this,” Lu said. “But I hope America can accept people like us, real refugees who faced real oppression. … It’s really disappointing.”
Lu comes from a long lineage of dissent: He was born into a family branded as “hostile elements” by the Chinese Communist Party for its land ownership and ties to a competing political party. A teacher and poet, Lu grew interested in history banned by the Chinese state, penning tributes to the bloody 1989 Tiananmen crackdown on pro-democracy protests in Beijing.
In 2004, Lu was arrested after police found poems and essays he secretly published criticizing Chinese politics and the education system. After his release, Lu became a Christian and began preaching, drawing scrutiny from local authorities. Year after year, officers knocked on his door, warning him not to organize protests or publish commentary criticizing the Party.
With Chinese leader Xi Jinping’s rise to power, controls tightened. When Beijing arrested hundreds of rights lawyers in 2015, Lu took his family and fled, worried police would come for him. After traveling across Southeast Asia, Lu and his family settled in Thailand, where they applied for refugee status with the United Nations.
Eight years later, the UN notified Lu the US had accepted his application. But their first flight, in April 2024, was postponed because Lu’s sons’ passports had expired. A second, scheduled for Jan. 22, 2025, was canceled without explanation, and the most recent one, scheduled for Feb. 26, was canceled shortly after Trump’s inauguration. His application has been put on hold indefinitely, Lu said.
Today, Lu is scraping a meager living as a teacher and pastor in Northern Thailand. He’s separated from his wife and children in Bangkok, Thailand’s capital, but says he has no choice if he wants to earn money and support his family.
“I am very supportive of all of Trump’s policies because I think only President Trump can dismantle the CCP,” Lu said, using an acronym referring to the Chinese Communist Party. “So I don’t have any complaints. I just wait silently.”
‘I don’t want to lose her’
Louis arrived in the United States as a refugee in September 2024. He left his wife and two children in East Africa, hoping they could soon be reunited in the US
But that dream faded a few months later with Trump’s return to the presidency.
Louis, who insisted on being identified only by his first name out of concern that speaking publicly could complicate his case, was told in January that a request he had made to bring his family to the US had been frozen due to changes in refugee policies.
Now, the family members live thousands of miles apart without knowing when they will be reunited. His wife, Apolina, and the children, 2 and 3 years old, are in a refugee camp in Uganda. Louis is in Kentucky.
“I don’t want to lose her, and she does not want to lose me,” said Louis, who resettled in Kentucky with the help of the International Rescue Committee. “The hope that I had went slowly down. I thought that we would never meet again,” he said referring to the moment when he received the notice.
Louis and Apolina’s families applied for refugee status after fleeing war in the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Louis’ application, initiated by his parents, was approved, Apolina’s, made separately by her parents, was not. They hoped if Louis applied for family reunification in the US, that would ease the way to bring over Apolina and the two children.
Apolina thought that, as the wife of a refugee, it would take her no more than one year to reunite with her husband, who now works in an appliance factory and has already applied for permanent residency.
The separation hasn’t been easy for her and the children, who live in a tent in the refugee camp. The younger one, who was 7 months old when Louis left, cries every time he sees his father in a video call. The older one keeps asking where Louis is and when he will see him.
Apolina fears that as time drags on, the children will forget their father.
“I feel terrible because I miss my husband very much,” said Apolina in a phone interview from Uganda. “I pray for him that God enables him to be patient until we meet again.”