Pakistan coalition party rejects key proposals in 27th constitutional amendment

Chairman Pakistan People’s Party, Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari (center sitting), speaks during a news conference in Karachi, Pakistan, on November 6, 2025. (Facebook/@Bilawalhouse)
Short Url
Updated 07 November 2025
Follow

Pakistan coalition party rejects key proposals in 27th constitutional amendment

  • The party says it supports only one clause so far that relates to the structure of armed forces leadership
  • PPP Chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari says they won’t compromise on provincial share in federal resources

KARACHI: The Pakistan People’s Party (PPP), a key coalition partner in Prime Minister Shahbaz Sharif’s government, on Thursday rejected key parts of the government’s proposed 27th constitutional amendment, including changes to the National Finance Commission (NFC) and devolution of powers, saying it would only support the clause relating to the armed forces.

According to political leaders privy to the issue, the amendment proposes creating a new constitutional court, restoring executive magistrates, revising the distribution of federal revenue among provinces and making changes to how senior judges and military leadership appointments are structured within the constitution.

The government has sped up consultations with parties in the governing alliance, including the PPP, the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and the Pakistan Muslim League-Quaid (PML-Q), in a bid to secure the two-thirds parliamentary majority required for constitutional changes.

Speaking at a news conference after a meeting of the PPP’s central executive committee (CEC), party chairman Bilawal Bhutto-Zardari said the committee had turned down any proposal that altered provincial share in federal resources or reversed devolution of powers achieved through the landmark 18th amendment.

“As far as the constitutional protection is concerned in the province’s share in constitution, that proposal is rejected by the Pakistan People’s Party,” he told reporters in Karachi after the CEC meeting that lasted for around five hours and will resume today to deliberate upon some more clauses. “In any case, we are not ready to support this proposal.”

He said the CEC had rejected proposals regarding “the reversal of devolution” of powers and called for equal representation of all provinces in the proposed constitutional court.

“We are not ready to compromise on equal representation of all four provinces,” he said.

Bhutto-Zardari shared the committee had so far approved only one amendment, a revision to Article 243, concerning the structure of the armed forces’ command.

“In Article 243, the government has thought of bringing about changes, that the position of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has to be given a new title. Then they have to give a new position of the National Strategic Command,” he said, adding one change was regarding the position of field marshal.

“The only constitutional amendment we have agreed to support is this one.”

Deliberations on other proposed amendments, including the creation of a constitutional court, would continue when the CEC reconvenes after Friday prayers, according to the PPP chairman.

The government’s proposed 27th amendment reportedly seeks to overhaul several constitutional provisions, including judicial structure, the election commission’s appointment mechanism, and revenue distribution between the federation and provinces.

The most contentious elements involve potential revisions to the NFC award, which determines how federal tax revenue is shared among provinces. The PPP, which spearheaded the 18th amendment in 2010 to expand provincial autonomy, has consistently opposed any measures that would dilute financial or administrative powers of the federating units.

Bhutto-Zardari told reporters in Karachi said his party refrained from commenting publicly on the proposals until the country’s leadership formally discussed them, but the CEC’s stance was now clear on all major points.

“The rest of the points have either been completely rejected or our discussion on them will continue tomorrow [Friday],” he said.

Constitutional amendments in Pakistan have frequently redefined the balance of power between the federation, judiciary, and provinces. The 18th amendment, enacted during the first presidency of Asif Ali Zardari, remains one of the country’s most significant political reforms, transferring control of education, health and other key subjects to provinces.

Bhutto-Zardari reiterated that his party would “resist any attempt” to roll back that devolution.

“The conversations are still ongoing,” he said. “God willing, we will continue our CEC [meeting on Friday].”

While the government’s discussions with coalition partners continue, the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI), the main opposition party led by former prime minister Imran Khan, has vowed to oppose the 27th amendment and demanded full disclosure of the draft before it reaches parliament.

Speaking to a private news channel, Geo News, Information Minister Attaullah Tarar said the amendments would be tabled before the federal cabinet after the PPP CEC makes any decision on it.

In Pakistan, constitutional amendments have historically been used to reshape the balance of power between the legislature, judiciary and provinces. The proposed 27th amendment follows the 26th amendment passed in October 2024, which gave parliament a role in appointing the chief justice and created a new panel of senior judges to hear constitutional cases, measures critics said weakened judicial independence.

Pakistan’s constitution, adopted in 1973, has been amended more than two dozen times, often reflecting shifts in authority among civilian governments and the military. Provisions governing the NFC award are among the most politically sensitive because they underpin the country’s federal structure and provincial autonomy.


Sindh assembly passes resolution rejecting move to separate Karachi

Updated 21 February 2026
Follow

Sindh assembly passes resolution rejecting move to separate Karachi

  • Chief Minister Shah cites constitutional safeguards against altering provincial boundaries
  • Calls to separate Karachi intensified amid governance concerns after a mall fire last month

ISLAMABAD: The provincial assembly of Pakistan’s southern Sindh province on Saturday passed a resolution rejecting any move to separate Karachi, declaring its territorial integrity “non-negotiable” amid political calls to carve the city out as a separate administrative unit.

The resolution comes after fresh demands by the Muttahida Qaumi Movement (MQM) and other voices to grant Karachi provincial or federal status following governance challenges highlighted by the deadly Gul Plaza fire earlier this year that killed 80 people.

Karachi, Pakistan’s largest and most densely populated city, is the country’s main commercial hub and contributes a significant share to the national economy.

Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah tabled the resolution in the assembly, condemning what he described as “divisive statements” about breaking up Sindh or detaching Karachi.

“The province that played a foundational role in the creation of Pakistan cannot allow the fragmentation of its own historic homeland,” Shah told lawmakers, adding that any attempt to divide Sindh or separate Karachi was contrary to the constitution and democratic norms.

Citing Article 239 of Pakistan’s 1973 Constitution, which requires the consent of not less than two-thirds of a provincial assembly to alter provincial boundaries, Shah said any such move could not proceed without the assembly’s approval.

“If any such move is attempted, it is this Assembly — by a two-thirds majority — that will decide,” he said.

The resolution reaffirmed that Karachi would “forever remain” an integral part of Sindh and directed the provincial government to forward the motion to the president, prime minister and parliamentary leadership for record.

Shah said the resolution was not aimed at anyone but referred to the shifting stance of MQM in the debate while warning that opposing the resolution would amount to supporting the division of Sindh.

The party has been a major political force in Karachi with a significant vote bank in the city and has frequently criticized Shah’s provincial administration over its governance of Pakistan’s largest metropolis.

Taha Ahmed Khan, a senior MQM leader, acknowledged that his party had “presented its demand openly on television channels with clear and logical arguments” to separate Karachi from Sindh.

“It is a purely constitutional debate,” he told Arab News by phone. “We are aware that the Pakistan Peoples Party, which rules the province, holds a two-thirds majority and that a new province cannot be created at this stage. But that does not mean new provinces can never be formed.”

Calls to alter Karachi’s status have periodically surfaced amid longstanding complaints over governance, infrastructure and administrative control in the megacity, though no formal proposal to redraw provincial boundaries has been introduced at the federal level.