Pakistan denies rejecting Kabul’s proposal to deport militants from Afghanistan at Istanbul talks

People wait near the closed gate at the Spin Boldak border crossing with Pakistan, after the border was shut for nearly two weeks following clashes between Afghan and Pakistani forces, in Kandahar province, Afghanistan, on October 23, 2025. (AP/File)
Short Url
Updated 01 November 2025
Follow

Pakistan denies rejecting Kabul’s proposal to deport militants from Afghanistan at Istanbul talks

  • Afghan media outlet Ariana News attributed the statement to spokesperson Zabihullah Mujahid
  • Report comes after Pakistan said Kabul admitted militant presence on its soil during the talks

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan on Saturday denied it refused an Afghan proposal to deport militants targeting its civilians and security forces during the Istanbul talks, calling the claim a deliberate distortion after an Afghan media outlet attributed the statement to a senior official in Kabul.

The two countries engaged in deadly border clashes last month that killed dozens of people on both sides before reaching a tenuous cease-fire amid peace talks mediated by Qatar and Türkiye. Pakistan has long accused Afghanistan of sheltering militants who launch cross-border attacks while urging the authorities in Kabul not to let their land be used by armed factions. Afghanistan has traditionally denied Islamabad’s allegation of any militant presence, describing Pakistan’s security challenges as its internal matter.

Pakistani officials said the Istanbul talks had a single-point agenda to ensure decisive and verifiable action against militants on Afghan soil. However, Ariana News quoted the Taliban administration's spokesperson, Zabihullah Mujahid, in a report that Pakistan did not accept its proposal “to expel individuals whom Islamabad considers a threat” while adding that it was trying to “create conditions for the United States to retake the Bagram Air Base.”

“Pakistan rejects deliberate twisting of facts attributed to Afghan spokesperson regarding Istanbul talks,” the Ministry of Information said in a social media post in which it shared the image of the Afghan media outlet’s claim.

“Pakistan had demanded that terrorists in Afghanistan posing a threat to Pakistan be controlled or arrested," it continued.

"When the Afghan side said that they were Pakistani nationals, Pakistan immediately proposed that they be handed over through designated border posts, consistent with Pakistan’s long-standing position. Any claim to the contrary is false and misleading.”

 

 

The Afghan spokesperson’s claim comes a day after the foreign office in Islamabad said Kabul’s negotiating team had acknowledged the presence of anti-Pakistan militants on its soil.

Its spokesperson, Tahir Hussain Andrabi, noted that Afghan authorities had given various justifications for not taking action against these militants.

“The presence of terrorist elements on Afghan soil reinforces Pakistan’s security concerns," he added.

The two countries have agreed to an extended cease-fire with a monitoring and verification mechanism developed with the help of the mediating countries.

The next round of talks between them is scheduled to be held in Istanbul on Nov. 6.


From sponsor to enemy: What’s behind latest conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan?

Updated 3 min 21 sec ago
Follow

From sponsor to enemy: What’s behind latest conflict between Pakistan and Afghanistan?

  • Once close to Afghan Taliban, Islamabad now accuses them of harboring anti-Pakistan militants, which Kabul denies
  • Afghan ⁠Taliban say Pakistan harbors fighters from its enemy, the Daesh group, a charge Islamabad denies

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan has been ‌the Afghan Taliban’s closest friend for decades. It was Islamabad that helped give birth to the Taliban in the early 1990s – as a way to give Pakistan “strategic depth” in its rivalry with India. What’s gone wrong?

Pakistan carried out air strikes on Afghanistan’s major cities overnight, officials in ​Islamabad and Kabul said on Friday, escalating months of border clashes between the Islamic neighbors. The air and ground strikes, which hit Taliban military posts, headquarters and ammunition depots in multiple sectors along the border, came after Afghanistan launched an attack on Pakistani border forces, the officials said.

Both sides reported heavy losses in the fighting, which Pakistan’s defense minister said amounted to an “open war.”

Tensions have been heating up since Pakistan launched air strikes on militant targets in Afghanistan last weekend.

Earlier, border clashes between the two countries killed dozens of soldiers in October until negotiations facilitated by Turkiye, Qatar and Saudi Arabia ceased the hostilities and a fragile ceasefire was put in place.

The escalating conflict is a long way from Islamabad’s historic support for the ‌Taliban. The key ‌questions:

WHY ARE THE NEIGHBOURS NOW AT ODDS?

Pakistan welcomed the return to power ​of ‌the ⁠Taliban in 2021, ​with ⁠then-Prime Minister Imran Khan saying that Afghans had “broken the shackles of slavery.”

But Islamabad soon found that the Taliban were not as cooperative as it had hoped. Islamabad says that the leadership of militant group Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and many of its fighters are based in Afghanistan, and that armed insurgents seeking independence for the southwestern Pakistani province of Balochistan also use Afghanistan as a safe haven.

Militancy has increased every year since 2022 with attacks by the TTP and Baloch insurgents growing, according to Armed Conflict Location & Event Data, a global monitoring organization.

Kabul for its part has repeatedly denied allowing militants to use Afghan territory to launch attacks in Pakistan.

The Afghan ⁠Taliban say Pakistan harbors fighters from its enemy, the Daesh group, a charge Islamabad denies.

Islamabad ‌says the ceasefire did not hold long due to continued militant attacks in ‌Pakistan from Afghanistan, and there have been repeated clashes and border closures ​since then that have disrupted trade and movement along the ‌rugged frontier.

WHAT SPARKED THE LATEST CLASHES?

The day before last weekend’s strikes, Pakistani security sources said they had “irrefutable evidence” that militants ‌in Afghanistan were behind a recent wave of attacks and suicide bombings which targeted Pakistani military and police.

The sources listed seven planned or successful attacks by militants since late 2024 that they said were connected to Afghanistan. One attack last week that killed 11 security personnel and two civilians in Bajaur district was undertaken by an Afghan national, according to Pakistani security sources. This attack was claimed by the TTP.

WHO ‌ARE THE PAKISTANI TALIBAN?

The TTP was formed in 2007 by several militant outfits active in northwest Pakistan. It is commonly known as the Pakistani Taliban. The TTP has attacked ⁠markets, mosques, airports, military bases, police ⁠stations and also gained territory — mostly along the border with Afghanistan, but also deep inside Pakistan, including the Swat Valley. The group was behind the 2012 attack on then schoolgirl Malala Yousafzai, who received the Nobel Peace Prize two years later.

The TTP also fought alongside the Afghan Taliban against US-led forces in Afghanistan and hosted Afghan fighters in Pakistan. Pakistan has launched military operations against the TTP on its own soil with limited success, although an offensive that ended in 2016 drastically reduced attacks till a few years ago.

WHAT MIGHT HAPPEN NEXT?

Pakistan is likely to intensify its military campaign, analysts say, while Kabul’s retaliation could come in the way of raids on border posts and more cross-border guerrilla attacks to target security forces.

On paper, there is a wide mismatch between the military capabilities of two sides. At 172,000, the Taliban have less than a third of Pakistan’s personnel.

The Taliban do possess at least six aircraft and 23 helicopters but their condition is unknown and ​they have no fighter jets or effective air force.

Pakistan’s ​armed forces include more than 600,000 active personnel, have more than 6,000 armored fighting vehicles and more than 400 combat aircraft, according to 2025 data from the International Institute for Strategic Studies. The country is also nuclear armed.