Countries will reject ‘peace enforcing’ in Gaza: Jordan’s king

US President Donald Trump shakes hands King Abdullah II of Jordan outside the West Wing of the White House, following their Oval Office meeting, in Washington, DC, on February 11, 2025. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 27 October 2025
Follow

Countries will reject ‘peace enforcing’ in Gaza: Jordan’s king

  • Mandate of security forces should be peacekeeping, not ‘running on patrol with weapons’
  • Queen Rania: ‘Trump was the first president in a long time to actually apply pressure on Israel’

LONDON: Countries will reject “peace enforcing” in Gaza under the plan drawn up by US President Donald Trump, Jordan’s King Abdullah II has told the BBC.

The plan calls for Arab and other states to send personnel to “train and provide support to vetted Palestinian police forces in Gaza, and (who) will consult with Jordan and Egypt who have extensive experience in this field.”

The king said his country and Egypt would be prepared to train Palestinian security forces, but a scenario involving foreign troops upholding order in Gaza would be unacceptable.

“What is the mandate of security forces inside of Gaza? And we hope that it is peacekeeping, because if it’s peace enforcing, nobody will want to touch that,” he added.

“Peacekeeping is that you’re sitting there supporting the local police force, the Palestinians, which Jordan and Egypt are willing to train in large numbers, but that takes time.

“If we’re running around Gaza on patrol with weapons, that’s not a situation that any country would like to get involved in.”

The king said sending Jordanian troops to Gaza would be challenging because his country is “too close politically” to the situation.

Half of his subjects claim Palestinian descent, and 2.3 million Palestinian refugees reside in Jordan.

Fears abound among many members of the international community that peacekeepers could be caught up in renewed hostilities between Israel and Hamas. 

“If we don’t solve this problem, if we don’t find a future for Israelis and Palestinians and a relationship between the Arab and Muslim world and Israel, we’re doomed,” the king said.

In a separate interview with the BBC, Jordan’s Queen Rania condemned the failure of the international community to end the war sooner.

“You know what it’s like to be a parent over the last two years? To watch your children suffering, starving, shaking in terror, and to be powerless to do anything about it, and to know that the whole world is watching and not to do anything about it,” said the queen, who is of Palestinian heritage.

“That nightmare, it’s the nightmare of any parent, but that nightmare has been the daily reality for Palestinians for the last two years.”

She praised the Trump administration for breaking through the impasse, saying: “To his credit, Trump was the first president in a long time to actually apply pressure on Israel.

“Beforehand, when they crossed lines, the US president would just maybe just say a few words of rebuke, or they just get a slap on the wrist.

“President Trump actually got (Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin) Netanyahu to actually agree to a ceasefire. And I hope that he continues to be engaged in this process.”

She added: “I truly believe that Palestinians and Israelis can exist side by side. In the current atmosphere, there’s too much animosity, too much anger and grief and hatred and cynicism between the two peoples to actually forge a peace on their own.

“I’m not being naive here. But I think, with the push of the international community, that is the only way.

“So many times during the past two years, hope had felt elusive. Choosing hope was not easy … It’s hard, it’s heavy. But it’s the only path that doesn’t deny Palestinians or betray their struggle or our humanity.”


US and Iran slide towards conflict as military buildup eclipses nuclear talks

Updated 28 min 13 sec ago
Follow

US and Iran slide towards conflict as military buildup eclipses nuclear talks

  • Washington building up one of its biggest military deployments in the region since the invasion of Iraq in 2003
  • Iran is expected to submit a written proposal in the coming days, a US official says

Iran and the United States are sliding rapidly towards military conflict as hopes fade for a diplomatic solution to their standoff over Tehran’s nuclear program, officials on both sides and diplomats across the Gulf and Europe say.

Iran’s Gulf neighbors and its enemy Israel now consider a conflict to be more likely than a settlement, these sources say, with Washington building up one of its biggest military deployments in the region since the invasion of Iraq in 2003.

Israel’s government believes Tehran and Washington are at an impasse and is making preparations for possible joint military action with the United States, though no decision has been made yet on whether to carry out such an operation, said a source familiar with the planning.

It would be the second time the US and Israel have attacked Iran in less than a year, following US and Israeli airstrikes against military and nuclear facilities last June.

Regional officials say oil-producing Gulf countries are preparing for a possible military confrontation that they fear could spin out of control and destabilize the Middle East.

Two Israeli officials told Reuters they believe the gaps between Washington and Tehran are unbridgeable and that the chances of a near‑term military escalation are high.

Some regional officials say Tehran is dangerously miscalculating by holding out for concessions, with US President Donald Trump boxed in by his own military buildup - unable to scale it back without losing face if there is no firm commitment from Iran to abandon its nuclear weapons ambitions.

“Both sides are sticking to their guns,” said Alan Eyre, a former US diplomat and Iran specialist, adding that nothing meaningful can emerge “unless the US and Iran walk back from their red lines - which I don’t think they will.”

“What Trump can’t do is assemble all this military, and then come back with a ‘so‑so’ deal and pull out the military. I think he thinks he’ll lose face,” he said. “If he attacks, it’s going to get ugly quickly.”

Two rounds of Iran-US talks have stalled on core issues, from uranium enrichment to missiles and sanctions relief.

When Omani mediators delivered an envelope from the US side containing missile‑related proposals, Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi refused even to open it and returned it, a source familiar with the talks said.

After talks in Geneva on Tuesday, Araghchi said the sides had agreed on “guiding principles,” but the White House said there was still distance between them.

Iran is expected to submit a written proposal in the coming days, a US official said, and Araghchi said on Friday he expected to have a draft counterproposal ready within days.

But Trump, who has sent aircraft carriers, warships and jets to the Middle East, warned Iran on Thursday it must make a deal over its nuclear program or “really bad things” will happen.

He appeared to set a deadline of 10 to 15 days, drawing a threat from Tehran to retaliate against US bases in the region if attacked. The rising tensions have pushed up oil prices.

US officials say Trump has yet to make up his mind about using military force although he acknowledged on Friday that he could order a limited strike to try to force Iran into a deal.

“I guess I can say I am considering that,” he told reporters.

The possible timing of an attack is unclear. US Secretary of State Marco Rubio is due to meet Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on February 28 to discuss Iran. A senior US official said it would be mid-March before all US forces were in place.