New documentary shows life in Gaza for AFP journalists

In the film, AFP journalist Mohammed Abed recalls several Western media outlets asking him to prove that a child had died, after pro-Israel lobby groups claimed that a photo he had taken of a father embracing his dead child in a shroud was actually that of a doll. (AFP/File)
Short Url
Updated 08 October 2025
Follow

New documentary shows life in Gaza for AFP journalists

  • Helen Lam Trong’s documentary “Inside Gaza” traces the lives of 7 journalists who covered the beginning of the Gaza conflict

PARIS: A new documentary tells the story of AFP journalists who were trapped in the Gaza Strip at the beginning of the Israeli offensive, witnessing the destruction of their own reality through a lens.
Independent journalist Helen Lam Trong’s documentary “Inside Gaza” will be screened at the Bayeux prize for war reporters award ceremony on Thursday in the presence of six of the seven permanent AFP journalists who covered the beginning of the Gaza conflict, before being broadcast on French-German TV channel Arte on December 2.
It traces their daily lives after October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacks in Israel led to the deaths of more than 1,200 people, according to an AFP tally based on official Israeli figures.
Then came the Israeli offensive, which has killed more than 67,000 people, according to figures from the Hamas-run health ministry — figures the United Nations considers reliable.
Day after day, the journalists had no choice but to document the unimaginable suffering of their own people.
“I wanted to explain what this profession is, which is primarily carried out in the field,” Trong, who co-produced the documentary with AFP’s documentary production unit Factstory, told AFP.
“Inside Gaza” almost exclusively relies on AFP images, mostly taken by the journalists who testify in it.

Attempts to discredit

Reporting in Gaza means being surrounded by children who are injured or in shock, and dead bodies wrapped in shrouds or buried under the rubble.
There is no let-up, as Israel has forbidden foreign journalists from entering the Palestinian territory.
“They are seasoned journalists in their fifties, and they know how to maintain their rigour under conditions of extreme urgency and discomfort,” said Trong, who conducted lengthy interviews with them after they left Gaza in early 2024.
But attempts to discredit these journalists are frequent.
AFP journalist Mohammed Abed recalls several Western media outlets asking him to prove that a child had died, after pro-Israel lobby groups claimed that a photo he had taken of a father embracing his dead child in a shroud was actually that of a doll.
“We have rarely seen such questioning of information disseminated by experienced journalists,” said Trong. “Palestinian journalists have faced the ultimate level of distrust from the media.”

Journalists a target

What is broadcast is “far, far from reality,” the director said, describing a careful curation process and a decision to remove the most disturbing footage from the film — a difficult task given the extent of Gaza’s destruction.
AFP’s seven journalists and their families were evacuated between February and April 2024 and now reside in Doha, Cairo and London, struggling with post-traumatic stress disorder.
The news agency is now working with a dozen freelancers in Gaza.
“The purpose of the film is to provoke reflection on what journalists do” as the profession faces global threats — particularly in Gaza, where the press is constantly targeted, said film producer and Factstory’s documentary unit head Yann Ollivier.
“I hope that those who claim there are no journalists in Gaza will be compelled, after watching this film, to acknowledge that there are indeed journalists there, and that they adhere to the ethics of factual journalism,” he told AFP.
Around 200 journalists have been killed in the Gaza Strip since the war began, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists and Reporters Without Borders.


BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim

Updated 14 November 2025
Follow

BBC apologizes to Trump over speech edit but rejects defamation claim

  • Trump team demanded compensation, apology
  • Broadcaster says it has no plans to rebroadcast documentary

LONDON: The British Broadcasting Corporation sent a personal apology to US President Donald Trump on Thursday but said there was no legal basis for him to sue the public broadcaster over a documentary his lawyers called defamatory.
The documentary, which aired on the BBC’s “Panorama” news program just before the US presidential election in 2024, spliced together three parts of Trump’s speech on January 6, 2021, when his supporters stormed the Capitol. The edit created the impression he had called for violence.
“While the BBC sincerely regrets the manner in which the video clip was edited, we strongly disagree there is a basis for a defamation claim,” the broadcaster said in a statement.
Lawyers for the US president threatened on Sunday to sue the BBC for damages of up to $1 billion unless it withdrew the documentary, apologized to the president and compensated him for “financial and reputational harm.”

No plans to rebroadcast
By asserting that Trump’s defamation case lacks merit, the BBC effectively signaled that it believes his claim for financial damages is equally untenable. But the broadcaster did not directly address Trump’s financial demand.
In its statement, the BBC said Chair Samir Shah on Thursday “sent a personal letter to the White House making clear that he and the corporation were sorry for the edit.” Shah earlier in the week apologized to a British parliamentary oversight committee and said the edit was “an error of judgment.”
British culture minister Lisa Nandy said on Friday it was right that the BBC had apologized to Trump.
“They’ve rightly accepted that they didn’t meet the highest standards and that’s the basis on which the chairman of the board has offered this apology to the President of the United States,” she told Times Radio. In its statement on Thursday, the BBC added that it has no plans to rebroadcast the documentary on any of its platforms.
Earlier on Thursday, the BBC said it was looking into fresh allegations, published in The Telegraph newspaper, over the editing by another of its programs, “Newsnight,” of the same speech.
The BBC has been thrown into its biggest crisis in decades after two senior executives resigned amid allegations of bias, including about the edit of Trump’s speech. The claims came to light because of a leaked report by a BBC standards official.
Founded in 1922 and funded largely by a license fee paid by TV-watching Britons, the BBC is without a permanent leader as the government weighs how it should be funded in the future.
It is a vital instrument of Britain’s “soft power” globally. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said on Wednesday that he believed in a “strong and independent” BBC.