‘Gaza’s biggest chance for peace lies in cross-regional cooperation,’ UNGA President Annalena Baerbock tells Arab News

Short Url
Updated 08 October 2025
Follow

‘Gaza’s biggest chance for peace lies in cross-regional cooperation,’ UNGA President Annalena Baerbock tells Arab News

  • Marking second anniversary of Oct. 7 attack, Baerbock backs Trump’s Gaza peace plan, praises Saudi-French efforts to achieve the two-state solution
  • Former German foreign minister urges reform to keep UN “relevant and effective” amid growing crises, from Gaza and Sudan to AI and climate change

NEW YORK CITY: In an era defined by compounding crises — from devastating wars in Gaza and Sudan to global demands for UN reform — few leaders embody the intersection of national commitment and international responsibility as Annalena Baerbock.

Since transitioning from German foreign minister to president of the UN General Assembly in June, Baerbock’s journey has placed her at the epicenter of world diplomacy at a time when the very structure of global cooperation is being questioned.

Speaking to Arab News shortly after the intensive High-Level Week of the 80th session of the UN General Assembly, Baerbock reflected on her firsthand encounters with human tragedy, the urgent necessity of compromise and the obstacles facing the UN as it navigates perhaps its most turbulent chapter since its founding.

Indeed, as Baerbock put it, “there was hardly any topic over this High-Level Week where all the 193 member states agreed.”




Annalena Baerbock with UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres. (UN Photo)

This week marks the second anniversary of the Oct. 7, 2023, Hamas-led attack on Israel, which killed about 1,200 people and saw 250 taken hostage. Israel’s military retaliation in Gaza has since killed 67,000 Palestinians, according to Palestinian health officials, although the true figure is likely far higher.

Baerbock, who was serving as Germany’s foreign minister at the time of the Hamas attack, recalled visiting the affected areas. She described a heart-wrenching meeting with a father whose daughters had been kidnapped.

“I was thinking the whole time, ‘if these were my girls’,” Baerbock told Arab News, recalling the father’s anguish as he watched video footage of his daughters being loaded into trucks by militants headed for Gaza.

“All these horrors, realizing what humans can do to other humans, was an incredible, traumatic watershed moment.”

She added: “The same counts today for seeing innocent Palestinian children walking through the rubble of what was their home, without their parents, left searching for food, drinking rainwater — because they have nothing left.”

Quoting an Israeli mother, she said: “‘It doesn’t bring back my child if a Palestinian mother loses hers in Israeli airstrikes.’ This war must end.”

Marking the solemn anniversary, Baerbock called for immediate peace. “This decades-long conflict between Palestinians and Israelis can never be overcome by endless war — neither by terrorism, nor by permanent occupation,” she said.

“Israeli people can only live in lasting peace if Palestinians can live in dignity in their own state. And Palestinians can only live in their own state in dignity if Israelis’ right of existence is guaranteed in the region.”

The second anniversary of the attack comes as indirect talks continue in Sharm El-Sheikh, where Egyptian and Qatari officials are shuttling between delegations from Israel and Hamas. The goal is to reach a final agreement on a US-backed plan to end the Gaza war.




An injured man holds an injured child after surviving an Israeli bombing in Khan Yunis. (AFP/File)

US President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan proposes an immediate end to fighting and the release of 48 hostages — of whom only 20 are thought to be alive — in exchange for hundreds of detained Palestinians.

It stipulates that once both sides agree, “full aid will be immediately sent into the Gaza Strip.” The plan also states that Hamas would have no role in governing Gaza and leaves open the prospect of an eventual Palestinian state.

Baerbock called it “a sign of hope” that, after more than 700 days of suffering, the world’s major powers are signaling that the war must end.

She said Trump’s plan builds on momentum created by the New York Declaration and the two-state summit co-chaired by Saudi Arabia and France during High-Level Week. “This initiative unites Arab countries, Europe, and the US in calling for hostages’ release, humanitarian access and a ceasefire,” she said.

Highlighting Saudi Arabia’s role, Baerbock described the “cross-regional cooperation” between key Arab and Western states as essential for reviving peace efforts. Drawing on her diplomatic experience, she noted how preparatory meetings in Riyadh and Munich laid essential groundwork.

“Nowadays, the biggest chance for peace lies in cross-regional cooperation — making it clear that it’s in everyone’s interest to bring conflicts to an end. This cooperation between Saudi Arabia and France, in the name of many other countries, was, in my view, a crucial step.

“But it didn’t come out of the blue. In my previous role, I remember all the night meetings I had with key Arab countries and a few European foreign ministers. We met in Riyadh, we met in Munich, in closed rooms, to prepare for these peace plan steps.”

The plan and the New York Declaration exceed calls for a ceasefire. They demand Hamas disarm, an Israeli military withdrawal from Gaza, the creation of a civilian Palestinian administration devoid of Hamas and security guarantees — including a possible stabilization force to prevent future violence, a force Baerbock herself proposed as foreign minister.




Naima Abu Ful with her 2-year-old malnourished child, Yazan, at their home in the Shati refugee camp in Gaza City. (AP/File)

Baerbock stepped into her new role at a time when the UN faces an existential crisis. Geopolitical tensions have paralyzed the Security Council, budget cuts have triggered a financial crisis and global threats — from climate change and artificial intelligence to multiple wars — challenge the UN’s viability in upholding peace and security.

Reflecting on the 80th General Assembly session, Baerbock described the UN as “at a crossroads.

“The UN is more relevant than ever, but it must reform to stay effective,” she said.

Almost 190 member states and more than 120 heads of state took part in High-Level Week, reinforcing the UN’s continued centrality in addressing global crises.

“Together with the secretary-general, we very openly told world leaders: This is their UN. This is our UN. You cannot blame the UN for failing and then not contribute to peacekeeping missions. You cannot blame the UN for failing and then violate the UN Charter.”

Despite initial skepticism, Baerbock noted a shift among leaders who embraced the assembly’s “Better Together” motto and committed to engaging with the reform process. She insisted that “no country in the world would be better off without the UN.”

She stressed that reform begins with self-examination and constructive proposals to streamline the UN’s work and focus its resources, especially toward peace and security.

“It’s easy to say ‘reform’ and not look at yourself — at what you can contribute. So, the task for member states now is to come up with proposals on how to reduce the workload and redirect our resources more efficiently — especially toward peace and security.”




Reflecting on the 80th General Assembly session, Baerbock described the UN as “at a crossroads. (UN Photo)

She said sustainable development is inseparable from lasting peace. “If people live in poverty, it’s a trigger for new crises. And the same goes for the climate crisis — it’s the biggest security threat of our century. If we don’t fight it together, it will only accelerate further conflict.”

High-Level Week also saw the first Syrian leader attend the General Assembly in almost 60 years. President Ahmad Al-Sharaa’s participation was widely described as historic for Syria, which had been internationally isolated for years. In his address, he pledged a “new Syria,” free of its “wretched past,” and committed to national rebuilding and reform.

As foreign minister, Baerbock was among the first European ministers to visit Damascus after Bashar Assad’s fall. Meeting twice with the Syrian president and with representatives from Syria’s diverse ethnic groups, she was convinced that “only the inclusion of all ethnic groups — Kurds, Druze, Alawites, Shiites and again, women and men — could enable this pathway of hope.”

Despite security warnings, she preferred direct engagement, inspired by the resilience of Syrian refugees and the harsh realities of places like Sednaya prison.

“It is the currency of diplomacy to meet face to face. That’s why I was there — also as a female foreign minister, the first from a European country — to speak directly with the new government about whether the international community can trust the promises that this will be a Syria for all ethnic groups.”

She added: “I felt we as an international community owe it to the millions of Syrians. I’ve met so many Syrian refugees, especially in Germany, knowing what they’ve been through — and then standing in the prison of Sednaya, again seeing what people can do to other human beings.”

Syria, she believes, exemplifies the UN’s essential role. “While many countries abandoned Syrians, it was the UN, it was UNRWA, that stayed on the ground, providing education for thousands of children, even though 40 percent of schools were destroyed.”




Syrian President Ahmed Al-Sharaa delivered a speech at the United Nations General Assembly in September. (AFP)

Baerbock acknowledged that Syria’s way forward is fragile but crucial: A constitutional process, inclusive governance, trust-building and selective lifting of sanctions.

“Nobody knows if Syria’s future will be a free one for all. But if we don’t try everything to make it so, we are responsible for the misery.”

She warned that foreign interference remains the greatest threat. “External actors are still trying to hinder this process. Interference isn’t just a violation of sovereignty — it’s the biggest threat to a peaceful, inclusive future for Syria.”

Turning to Sudan, Baerbock described the humanitarian situation as “just beyond words.” She highlighted that the extent of suffering — widespread hunger and sexual violence against women and girls — exceeds many other conflicts.

“The battle between two competing armies, and two competing generals, goes literally over the bodies of women and girls being raped over and over again,” she said.

She criticized the “negative engagement” of foreign powers prolonging the conflict through arms deliveries and political interference, thereby obstructing the UN’s peace-building role.

Her transition from German foreign minister to General Assembly president, Baerbock said, was not simply swift but uniquely valuable given her background in Middle East diplomacy.

“Without having been part of such intensive discussions and negotiations, I wouldn’t have been able to lead on such a complex and non-consensual topic,” she reflected on the two-state summit.




A displaced child, whose family fled violence by two rival Sudanese generals, stands in the courtyard of the University of Al-Jazira in Al-Hasahisa, Khartoum. (AFP/File)

“It helped that I knew the French president and (Saudi Foreign Minister) Prince Faisal (bin Farhan) personally. Again, it’s about trust.”

For Baerbock, the assembly president’s job is to defend and rally support behind the UN Charter — not through neutrality, but with commitment. Yet, she acknowledges, consensus is harder to achieve today.

“Consensus is defined differently now. The ability to put yourself in others’ shoes — not just push your opinion — is the most important skill.”

Her record as a negotiator is now seen as key to her ability to marshal support for reforms. Analysts say her experience prepares her to rally former peers toward renewed multilateral cooperation.

“We didn’t come up with the idea ourselves,” she said of former ministers taking up the presidency. “It’s based on the good example of our predecessors. Years of face-to-face negotiation builds the trust you need to tackle difficult issues.

“You can handle tough topics better if you’ve been through nights of negotiation and know each other on a personal level. Not just knowing heads of government, but having their phone number. Texting them before they speak: ‘Remember to bring an example of why the UN matters to your region.’ Or texting them after they leave New York: ‘Remember to bring your reform proposal when you come back.’ You can send it with a smiley. But they know I mean it.”




Baerbock transitioned from German foreign minister to president of the UN General Assembly in June. (UN Photo)

Looking ahead, Baerbock will spearhead the process of selecting the next UN secretary-general, a responsibility she approaches with urgency and optimism.

Many member states, she says, support the nomination of a woman — not just for symbolism, but to reinforce the UN’s credibility on gender equity. She also notes a growing call for the General Assembly to play a greater role in selection, particularly as the Security Council remains deadlocked.

She highlighted the need for transparency, outlining that coordination with the Security Council — including current president Russia — has already begun.

“There’s a strong call for a very transparent process,” she said, reinforcing the importance of accountability and the engagement of member states.

 


Ahead of strikes, Trump was told Iran attack is high risk, high reward

Updated 6 sec ago
Follow

Ahead of strikes, Trump was told Iran attack is high risk, high reward

  • Experts caution that the unfolding conflict could take dangerous turns and the first official said ‌the Pentagon’s planning did not appear to guarantee the outcome of any conflict

WASHINGTON: Ahead of the US attack on Iran, President Donald Trump received briefings that not only delivered blunt assessments about the risk of major US casualties but also touted the prospect of a geopolitical shift in the Middle East in favor of US interests, ​a US official told Reuters. The launch of what the Pentagon called Operation Epic Fury on Saturday plunged the Middle East into a new and unpredictable conflict. The US and Israeli militaries struck sites across Iran, triggering retaliatory Iranian attacks against Israel and nearby Gulf Arab countries.
The official, who spoke on condition of anonymity, said the briefers described the operation to the president as a high-risk, high-reward scenario that could present a once-in-a-generation opportunity for change in the region.

HIGHLIGHTS

• Trump briefings included risks, opportunities in Middle East 

• Diplomatic efforts with Iran fail to avert ‌military confrontation 

• Iran vows retaliation, targets US and Israeli interests

Trump himself appeared to echo that sentiment when he acknowledged the stakes at the onset of the operation, saying “the lives of courageous American heroes may be lost.”
“But we’re doing this not for now, we’re doing this for the future, and it is a noble mission,” Trump said in a video address announcing the start of major combat operations.
“For 47 years, the Iranian regime has chanted death to America and waged an unending campaign of ‌bloodshed and mass murder ... We’re ‌not gonna put up with it any longer.”
The briefings from Trump’s national security team help explain ​how ‌the ⁠president decided ​to ⁠pursue arguably the riskiest US military operation since the invasion of Iraq in 2003.
Ahead of the strikes, Trump received multiple briefings from officials, including CIA Director John Ratcliffe, US General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth.
On Thursday, Admiral Brad Cooper, who leads US forces in the Middle East as the head of Central Command, flew to Washington to join discussions in the White House Situation Room.
A second US official said that before the strikes, the White House had been briefed on risks associated with operations against Iran, including retaliatory strikes on multiple US bases in the region by Iranian missiles that could overwhelm defenses, as well as Iranian proxies attacking US troops in Iraq and Syria.
The official said that despite the massive military ⁠buildup by the United States, there were limits to the air defense systems that had been rushed into ‌the region.
Experts caution that the unfolding conflict could take dangerous turns and the first official said ‌the Pentagon’s planning did not appear to guarantee the outcome of any conflict.
Trump called on Iranians ​to topple the government but that is easier said than done, said ‌Nicole Grajewski with the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.
“The Iranian opposition is pretty fragmented. It’s unclear what the population is willing to do in ‌terms of rising up,” Grajewski said.
Both US officials requested anonymity due to the sensitivity of the internal discussions.
The White House did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The Pentagon declined to comment.

TRUMP’S SWEEPING GOALS

In the weeks leading up to the attack, Trump ordered a major military buildup in the Middle East. Reuters reported military planning to carry out a sustained campaign against Iran, if that is what the president chose. Plans included targeting individual officials, officials said.
An Israeli official said Iran’s Supreme Leader Ayatollah ‌Ali Khamenei and President Masoud Pezeshkian were both targeted but the result of the strikes was unclear. Speaking on Saturday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said there were many signs indicating that Khamenei “is no longer” and ⁠called on Iranians to “take to the streets ⁠to finish the job.”
Trump made clear on Saturday that his objectives in Iran were sweeping, saying he would end the threat posed by Tehran to the United States and give Iranians a chance to topple their rulers. To accomplish this, he outlined plans to lay waste to much of Iran’s military as well as deny it the ability to build a nuclear weapon. Iran denies seeking a nuclear weapon.
“We are going to destroy their missiles and raze their missile industry to the ground... We’re going to annihilate their navy,” he said. “We’re going to ensure that the region’s terrorist proxies can no longer destabilize the region or the world and attack our forces.”
Trump’s decision demonstrates an increasing risk appetite, far greater than when he ordered US special operations forces into Venezuela last month to seize that country’s president in an audacious raid.
The unfolding campaign against Iran is also riskier than when Trump ordered US forces to bomb Iran’s nuclear sites in June.
Iran’s Revolutionary Guards threatened all US bases and interests in the region and said Iran’s retaliation would continue until “the enemy is decisively defeated.”
Experts warn that Iran has many options for retaliation, including missile strikes but also drones and cyber warfare.
Daniel Shapiro, a former senior ​Pentagon official for Middle East issues, said that despite the US ​and Israeli strikes, Tehran would still be capable of causing some pain.
“Iran has many more ballistic missiles that can reach US bases than the US has interceptors ... some Iranian weapons will get through,” said Shapiro, also a former US ambassador to Israel. “(The strikes are) a major gamble.”