Afghanistan rejects Trump’s plan to regain Bagram air base

An Afghan National Army (ANA) soldier stands guard at Bagram Air Base, north of Kabul, on July 2, 2021. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 19 September 2025
Follow

Afghanistan rejects Trump’s plan to regain Bagram air base

  • Bagram was the largest US base in Afghanistan during 20-year occupation
  • Base holds strategic value for US to counter influence of China, experts say

KABUL: The Taliban have rejected the return of the US military to Afghanistan after President Donald Trump claimed that Washington sought to regain control of a key air base abandoned during the 2021 withdrawal.

Bagram Air Base, some 50 km north of Kabul, was built by the Soviet Union in the 1950s. Following the US invasion of Afghanistan in 2001, it was taken over by Americans and served as their largest base and center during the two-decade occupation.

Trump made the unexpected announcement of his administration’s efforts to reclaim the base during his UK visit, at a joint press conference with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on Thursday.

He said his administration had been working to “get it back,” as it was an important foothold due to its proximity to China.

“We gave it to them for nothing,” he said. “One of the reasons we want the base is, as you know, it’s an hour away from where China makes its nuclear weapons.”

The Afghan government responded almost immediately by dismissing the possibility of reestablishing a US military presence in the country.

The full withdrawal of all US and NATO troops from Afghanistan was agreed during US–Taliban negotiations in Doha, which took place in 2018–2020, under Trump’s first administration.

“Afghans have never accepted a military presence in history, and this possibility was also completely rejected during the Doha talks and agreement. However, the door is open for other forms of engagement,” Zakir Jalaly, an official at the Afghan Foreign Ministry, said in a post on X.

“Afghanistan and the United States need to engage with each other and can have economic and political relations based on mutual respect and shared interests — without the US having any military presence in any part of Afghanistan.”

The US has not formally recognized the new Afghan government after the Taliban took control of the country following the American and NATO withdrawal.

Talks between the two sides have so far been limited to hostage negotiations, including discussions last week between authorities in Kabul and a US delegation led by Adam Boehler, the Trump administration’s special envoy for hostage response.

In March, Trump said that the US should have stayed at Bagram “not because of Afghanistan but because of China,” adding that the facility was “now under China’s influence,” which the Taliban denied.

“Bagram Airbase holds significant strategic value for the US in countering the influence of China, Russia, and Iran — three major competitors in the region. Granting the US control over the base would enhance its capacity to monitor Chinese military activity, carry out limited strikes, conduct covert operations, and gather vital intelligence,” Abdul Saboor Mubariz, board member of the Center for Strategic and Regional Studies in Kabul, told Arab News.

While rejecting the US plan may further strain Kabul’s relations with Washington, cause further sanctions and delay prospects for international recognition, Mubariz did not expect the Taliban to allow renewed American military presence.

“As long as the existing government remains in power, such cooperation appears improbable unless there is a substantial shift in policy,” he said.

At the same time, the air base’s relevance has grown for the US in the wake of China’s military technology advancement and closer alliances with Russia, North Korea and member countries of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, according to Alef Khan Atif, political science lecturer at Dawat University in Kabul.

“Securing access to Bagram would enhance US influence across Central and South Asia, as well as the Middle East. It would provide a critical foothold for intelligence operations and military oversight in these regions, strengthening America’s strategic reach,” he said.

“Given Bagram’s proximity to major geopolitical rivals such as China, Russia, and Iran, maintaining a presence at the base is essential for the US to reinforce its global standing and regional dominance.”


Greek coast guard search for 15 after migrant boat found adrift

Updated 09 December 2025
Follow

Greek coast guard search for 15 after migrant boat found adrift

  • The two survivors reported that the vessel had become unstable due to bad weather and there was no means of getting shelter, food or water

ATHENS: Greek coast guard were on Monday searching for 15 people who fell into the water from a migrant boat that was found drifting off the coast of Crete with 17 bodies on board.
The 17 fatalities, all of them men, were discovered on Saturday on the craft, which was taking on water and partially deflated, some 26 nautical miles (48 kilometers) southwest of the island.
Post-mortem examinations were being carried out to determine how they died but Greek public television channel ERT suggested they may have suffered from hypothermia or dehydration.
A Greek coast guard spokeswoman told AFP that two survivors reported that “15 people fell in the water” after the motor cut out on Thursday, then the vessel drifted for two days.
At the time, Crete and much of the rest of Greece was battered by heavy rain and storms.
The two survivors reported that the vessel had become unstable due to bad weather and there was no means of getting shelter, food or water.
The vessel had 34 people on board and had left the Libyan port of Tobruk on Wednesday, the Greek port authorities said. Most of those who died came from Sudan and Egypt.
It was initially spotted by a Turkish-flagged cargo ship on Saturday, triggering a search that included ships and aircraft from the Greek coast guard and the European Union border agency Frontex.
Migrants have been trying to reach Crete from Libya for the last year, as a way of entering the European Union. But the Mediterranean crossing is perilous.
In Brussels, the EU’s 27 members on Monday backed a significant tightening of immigration policy, including the concept of returning failed asylum-seekers to “return hubs” outside the bloc.
The UN refugee agency said more than 16,770 asylum seekers in the EU have arrived on Crete since the start of the year — more than any other island in the Aegean Sea.
Greece’s conservative government has also toughened its migration policy, suspending asylum claims for three months, particularly those coming to Crete from Libya.