Pakistan hails May conflict as ‘textbook deterrence,’ slams India’s cricket politics

Pakistan’s Information Minister Attaullah Tarar speaks during an event at the Institute of Regional Studies in Islamabad on September 16, 2025. (PTV News)
Short Url
Updated 16 September 2025
Follow

Pakistan hails May conflict as ‘textbook deterrence,’ slams India’s cricket politics

  • Information minister says Pakistan acting as “balancer” in South Asia, charges India with hegemonic ambitions
  • Clashes in May that marked deadliest cross-border fighting since 2019 have spilled over into cricket during Asia Cup

KARACHI: Information Minister Attaullah Tarar on Monday described May’s brief but intense war with India as “textbook deterrence,” saying Pakistan’s military response had reinforced its role as a stabilizing force in South Asia.

India and Pakistan fought a four-day war in May 2025 following an attack on civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir that New Delhi blamed on Islamabad. Pakistan has denied involvement. The violence spiraled into the deadliest cross-border hostilities since 2019, with missile, drone and artillery exchanges killing more than 70 people before both sides agreed to a US-brokered ceasefire.

In Islamabad’s telling, it shot down at least six Indian planes during the fighting and forced New Delhi to agree to a ceasefire, which it says proved Islamabad could impose costs high enough to prevent further escalation. 

“This false notion of rising India and assuming this role of a bully in South Asia was very effectively countered by Pakistan during the four-day war,” Tarar said as he addressed an event organized by a think tank in Islamabad. 

“The whole world witnessed that when an aggressor resorted to unprovoked, unjustified aggression, the whole Pakistani nation came together and our response compelled the enemy not only to retreat but to request for a ceasefire so that, ladies and gentlemen, was textbook deterrence.”

He added that Pakistan would continue to play its role in maintaining and supporting peace in the region and “act not only as a deterrent but also as a balancer in this region.”

CRICKET TIES

The minister also linked the conflict to more recent friction between the two neighbors on the cricket pitch.

Their teams faced off at the Asia Cup in Dubai last Sunday, after which Pakistan lodged a protest with the International Cricket Council (ICC) as India’s players walked off without the customary handshake at the end of the game. 

“Now they’re trying to politicize the sport of cricket, that is just a failed attempt in saving oneself from embarrassment because we proved our military dominance,” Tarar said. “Now they’re bringing politics to the sports grounds.”

His comments came as Pakistan has pressed the ICC to remove the match referee after alleging bias in the handling of the India clash, underscoring how political and security tensions frequently spill over into sport between the two neighbors.

The two countries also remain locked in disputes over the contested Kashmir region that they both claim in full but rule in part, as well as water resources and cross-border militancy.


Islamabad hits back after Indian minister blames Pakistan army for ‘ideological hostility’

Updated 10 sec ago
Follow

Islamabad hits back after Indian minister blames Pakistan army for ‘ideological hostility’

  • Jaishankar tells a public forum most of India’s problems with Islamabad stem from Pakistan’s military establishment
  • Pakistan condemns the remarks, accusing India of waging a propaganda drive to deflect from its destabilizing actions

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan accused India on Sunday of running a propaganda campaign to malign its state institutions, a day after Indian External Affairs Minister Subrahmanyam Jaishankar attributed what he described as Pakistan’s “ideological hostility” toward New Delhi to the country’s powerful army.

Addressing a public forum in New Delhi, Jaishankar said most of India’s problems with Pakistan stemmed from its military establishment, which he argued had cultivated and sustained an entrenched animosity toward India.

His remarks came months after a brief but intense military confrontation between the nuclear-armed neighbors, during which both sides exchanged artillery and missile fire and deployed drones and fighter jets.

Responding to the comments, Pakistan’s Foreign Office spokesperson Tahir Andrabi called them “highly inflammatory, baseless and irresponsible.”

“Pakistan is a responsible state and its all institutions, including armed forces, are a pillar of national security, dedicated to safeguarding the sovereignty and territorial integrity of the country,” Andrabi said in a statement. “The May 2025 conflict vividly demonstrated Pakistan armed forces’ professionalism as well as their resolve to defend the motherland and the people of Pakistan against any Indian aggression in a befitting, effective yet responsible manner.”

“The attempts by Indian leadership to defame Pakistan’s state institutions and its leadership are a part of a propaganda campaign designed to distract attention from India’s destabilising actions in the region and beyond as well as state-sponsored terrorism in Pakistan,” he said, adding that such “incendiary rhetoric” showed the extent of India’s disregard for regional peace and stability.

Andrabi said that rather than making “misleading remarks about the armed forces of Pakistan,” India should confront the “fascist and revisionist Hindutva ideology that has unleashed a reign of mob justice, lynchings, arbitrary detentions and demolition of properties and places of worship.”

He warned that the Indian state and its leadership had become hostage to “this terror in the name of religion.”

India and Pakistan have fought three wars since independence in 1947. They have also engaged in countless border skirmishes and major military standoffs, including the 1999 Kargil conflict.

The four-day conflict in May 2025 ended with a US-brokered ceasefire, after Washington said both sides had expressed willingness to pursue dialogue.

Pakistan said it was ready to discuss all outstanding issues, but India declined talks.

 

-End